Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T12:30:59.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The monoclonal antibody H386F labels microglia in the retinal nerve fiber layer of several mammals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Nina Tumosa  and
James R. Baker
Nina Tumosa
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Missouri, St. Louis
James R. Baker
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Missouri, St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The antibody H386F revealed microglia in the retinae of several species: owl monkey, slow loris, galago, ferret, raccoon, and tree shrew. The shape, size, and density of labeled microglia were identical to those labeled by OX-42 and OX-41, two antibodies specific for microglia, in both galago and owl monkey. The labeled microglia varied little in retinal location. There was remarkably little variability in density, shape, number, and size of the abeled microglia between species. All labeled microglia were evenly distributed across, but restricted to, the nerve liber layer. Possible reasons for this restriction in location are discussed.

Keywords

MicrogliaImmunohistochemistryRetinaPrimatesCarnivores

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , July 1997 , pp. 663 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashwell, K. (1989). Development of microglia in the albino rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 287, 286–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashwell, K., Hollander, H., Streit, W. & Stone, J. (1989). The appearance and distribution of microglia in the developing retina of the rat. Visual Neuroscience 2, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boycott, B.B. & Hopkins, J.M. (1981). Microglia in the retina of monkey and other mammals: Its distinction from other types of glia and horizontal cells. Neuroscience 6, 679–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casagrande, V.A. (1994). A third parallel pathway to primate area V1. Trends in Neuroscience 17, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casagrande, V.A. & Norton, T.T. (1991). Lateral geniculate nucleus: A review of its physiology and function. In The Basis of Visual function Vol. 4, ed. Leventhal, A.G., pp. 41–84. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Chan-Ling, T. (1994). Glial, neuronal and vascular interactions in the mammalian retina. In Progress in Retinal Eye Research, ed. Osborne, N.N. & Chader, G.J., pp. 357–389. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Del Rio-Hortega, P. (1932). Microglia. In Cytology and Cellular Pathology of the Nervous System, Vol. 2, ed. Penfield, W., pp. 482–534. New York: Hoeber, Inc.Google Scholar
Diaz-Araya, C.M., Provis, J.M., Penfold, P.L. & Billson, F.A. (1995). Development of microglial topography in human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 363, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drager, U. (1983). Coexistence of neurofilaments and vimentin in a neurone of adult mouse retina. Nature (London) 303, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D.A., Perry, V.H. & Gordon, S. (1983). Immunohistochemical localization of a macrophage-specific antigen in developing mouse retina: Phagocytosis of dying neurons and differentiation of microglial cells to form a regular array in the plexiform layers. Journal of Cell Biology 97, 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, M.F. & Moore, S.R. (1996). Microglial responses to focal lesions of the rabbit retina: Correlation with neural and macroglial reactions. Glia 16, 325–341.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, C.E., Cunningham, T.J. & Levitt, P. (1991). Differential immunochemical markers reveal the normal distribution of brain macrophages and microglia in the developing rat brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology 314, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penfold, P.L., Madigan, M.C. & Provis, J.M. (1991). Antibodies to human leucocyte antigens indicate subpopulations of microglia in human retina. Visual Neuroscience 7, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, V.H. (1994). Macrophages and the Nervous System. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Provis, J.M., Penfold, P.L., Edwards, A.J. & Van Driel, D. (1995). Human retinal microglia: Expression of immune markers and relationship to the Glia Limitons. Glia 14, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A.P., White, T.M. & Mason, D.W. (1986). Macrophage heterogeneity in the rat as delineated by two monoclonal antibodies MRC OX-41 and MRC OX-42, the latter recognizing complement receptor type 3. Immunology 57, 239–247.Google ScholarPubMed
Sanyal, S. & De Ruiter, A. (1985). Inosine diphosphatase as a histochemical marker for retinal vasculature, with special reference to transformation of microglia. Cell and Tissue Research 241, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnitzer, J. (1989). Enzyme-histochemical demonstration of microglial cells in the adult and postnatal rabbit retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology 282, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnitzer, J. & Scherer, J. (1990). Microglial cell responses in the rabbit retina following transection of the optic nerve. Journal of Comparative Neurology 302, 779–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thanos, S., Mey, J. & Wild, M. (1993). Treatment of the adult retina with microglia-suppressing factors retards axotomy-induced neuronal degradation and enhances axonal regeneration in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Neuroscience 13, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tumosa, N. & Baker, J.R. (1996). Microglia in the nerve fiber layer of the cat retina: Detection of postnatal changes by a new monoclonal antibody. Visual Neuroscience 13, 671–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrabec, F. (1970). Microglia in the monkey and rabbit retina. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology 29, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed