Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T13:21:43.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Evolution within an Advanced-Undergraduate Paleontology Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Roger J. Cuffey
Roger J. Cuffey*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, 412 Deike Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Evolution seems most convincingly presented as a final unit in a comprehensive paleontology course, because the students by then will have learned about the procedures and data necessary to understand the relevant evidence. Transitional fossils, their logical implications, and the mechanisms of evolution should be particularly emphasized. Questions may still remain in some students' minds after presentation of the evidence, and devoting a full day to student questions helps them resolve many issues.

Information

Type
Panel Discussion
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 5: The Evolution-Creation Controversy II: Perspectives on Science, Religion, and Geological Education , October 1999 , pp. 207 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Alberstadt, L. P. 1979. The brachiopod genus Platystrophia. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1066(B):1–20.Google Scholar
Brown, G. D., and Daly, E. J. 1981. Evolutionary trends in Parvohallopora Singh in the Dillsboro Formation (Upper Ordovician) of southeastern Indiana, p. 29–38. In Larwood, G. P. and Nielsen, C. (eds.), Recent and Fossil Bryozoa. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg (Denmark).Google Scholar
Brown, G. D., and Daly, E. J. 1985. Analysis of evolution of structural characters of Parvohallopora Singh from the Dillsboro Formation, Cincinnatian Series, Indiana, p. 51–58. In Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg (Denmark).Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. Freeman, New York, 698 p.Google Scholar
Clark, W. B. 1904. Miocene. Maryland Geological Survey, text vol.: i-543, plate vol.: pl. 10–135.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J. 1967. Bryozoan Tabulipora carbonaria in Wreford Megacyclothem (Lower Permian) of Kansas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article, 43:1–96.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J. 1972, 1984. Paleontologic evidence and organic evolution. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 24(4): 160–161, 166–174, 177. Reprinted, p. 255–281. In Montagu, A. (ed.), Science and Creationism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J. 1993. Precise paleotemperature determination from mollusk and bryozoan paleoecology (Pleistocene, Virginia) – Implications for analyzing geologically recent global change. SEPM Mid-Year Meeting Abstracts with Programs, 1993:41.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J., Davidheiser, C. E., Fonda, S. S., Lutz, A. B., Zimmerman, L. S., and Skerky, B. B. 1985. A mid-Silurian coral-bryozoan reef in central Pennsylvania, and guide to the Lock Haven reef. Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Guidebook, 50:1–19.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J., and Pachut, J. F. 1990. Clinal morphological variation along a depth gradient in the living scleractinian reef coral Favia pallida: Effects on perceived evolutionary tempos in the fossil record. Palaios, 5:580–588.Google Scholar
Davis, R. A., and Cuffey, R. J. (eds.). 1998. Sampling the layer cake that isn't: The stratigraphy and paleontology of the type-Cincinnatian. Ohio Geological Survey Guidebook, 13:1–194.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. L., Rodda, P. U., and Dietrich, J. W. 1964. Evolution of Athleta petrosa stock (Eocene, Gastropoda) of Texas. Bureau of Economic Geology of the University of Texas, Pulication, 6413:1–117.Google Scholar
Gautier, T. G. 1970. Interpretive morphology and taxonomy of bryozoan genus Tabulipora . University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper, 48:1–21.Google Scholar
Geary, D. H. 1995. The importance of gradual change in species-level transitions, p. 67–86. In Erwin, D. H. and Anstey, R. L. (eds.), New Approaches to Speciation in the Fossil Record. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gilmour, E. H. 1962. A new species of Tabulipora from the Permian of Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 36:1019–1020.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1985. Species in the fossil record: concepts, trends, and transitions. Paleobiology, 11:27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, H. 1957. “Spirifer disjunctus”: Its evolution and paleoecology in the Catskill Delta. Yale University Peabody Museum of Natural History, Bulletin, 11:1–75.Google Scholar
Krumbein, W. C., and Sloss, L. L. 1963. Stratigraphy and Sedimentation, 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco, 660 p.Google Scholar
Lubenow, M. L. 1983. “From Fish to Gish”: The Exciting Drama of a Decade of Creation-Evolution Debates. CLP Publishers, San Diego, 293 p.Google Scholar
Mapleton, L. T., and Cuffey, R. J. 1992. Pleistocene estuarine bryozoans and mollusks at the CEBAF site in southeastern Virginia. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 24(3):61.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1972. Nonfenestrate Ectoprocta (Bryozoa) of the Bangor Limestone (Chester) of Alabama. Alabama Geological Survey Bulletin, 98:1–144.Google Scholar
Pachut, J. F., and Cuffey, R. J. 1991. Clinal variation, intraspecific heterochrony, and microevolution in the Permian bryozoan Tabulipora carbonaria. Lethaia, 24:165–185.Google Scholar
Pachut, J. F., Cuffey, R. J., and Anstey, R. L. 1991. The concepts of astogeny and ontogeny in stenolaemate bryozoans, and their illustration in colonies of Tabulipora carbonaria from the Lower Permian of Kansas. Journal of Paleontology, 65:213–233.Google Scholar
Perkins, R. D., Perry, T. G., and Hattin, D. E. 1962. Some bryozoans from the Beil Limestone Member of the Lecompton Limestone (Virgilian) of Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 157(5):1–25.Google Scholar
Perry, T. G., and Gutschick, R. C. 1959. Bryozoans from the Amsden Formation, southwest Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 33:313–322.Google Scholar
Perry, T. G., and Horowitz, A. S. 1963. Bryozoans from the Glen Dean Limestone (Middle Chester) of southern Indiana and Kentucky. Indiana Geological Survey Bulletin, 26:1–51.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology, 3rd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 468 p.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R. 1944. Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley, New York, 837 p.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1971. Oysters, p. 953–1224. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part N, Volume 3. Geological Society of America, Boulder, and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Tang, S., and Cuffey, R. J. 1998. Inconobotopora lichenoporoides, a new genus and species of cystoporate bryozoan from the Silurian of Gotland, and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Paleontology, 72:256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1957. Miocene fossils of Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey Bulletin, 20:1–85.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M. 1966. The Silurian brachiopod Eocoelia hemisphaerica (J. de C. Sowerby) and related species. Palaeontology, 9:523–543.Google Scholar