Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-pzzxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T18:52:17.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Faith, works and talents entwined: Driving forces behind John Nevile’s contributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

GC Harcourt ,
Peter Kriesler  and
John Langmore
GC Harcourt
Affiliation:
The University of New South Wales, Australia
Peter Kriesler*
Affiliation:
The University of New South Wales, Australia
John Langmore
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia
*
Peter Kriesler, Associate, Industrial Relations Research Centre, Australian School of Business, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: p.kriesler@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we consider the mainsprings of John Nevile’s many contributions to economics. John has repeatedly argued that because ‘economic actions, institutions and policies affect people’, they have an ethical dimension (Hawtrey and Nevile, 1986: 1), and he has stressed the importance of understanding the value judgements on which economics rests. His policy suggestions are aimed at improving social justice and the well-being of the most vulnerable. Apart from his deep knowledge of economic theory, his Christian faith provides an important foundation for his analysis, particularly of policy.

Keywords

B21B40E60Economic biographyeconomic methodologyeconomic policyeconomic welfareethics

Information

Type
Symposium Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 228 - 237
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chipman, J (1987) Compensation principle. In:Eatwell, J, Milgate, M, Newman, P (eds) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1. London: Macmillan and New York: The Stockton Press, pp. 524–531.Google Scholar
Harcourt, GC (2001) 50 Years a Keynesian and Other Essays. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, RF (1939) An essay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal 49(193): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, RF (1948) Towards a Dynamic Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hawtrey, EM, Nevile, JW (1986) A Christian perspective on the Accord. Paper presented at the 15th Conference of Economists, Monash, VIC, Australia, August. Available at: http://christian-economists.org.uk/jour_4_1.pdf Google Scholar
Kriesler, P, Nevile, J (2002) IS-LM and macroeconomics after Keynes. In:Arestis, P, Desai, M, Dow, S (eds) Money, Macroeconomics and Keynes: Essays in Honour of Victoria Chick, vol. 1. London: Routledge, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
Lodewijks, J (1994) A conversation with John Nevile. In: Rao, B, Bhaskara, B (eds) Essays in Economics: In Honour of Professor J.W. Nevile, Presented to Him on His Retirement. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Centre for Applied Economic Research, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (1962) A simple econometric model of the Australian economy. Australian Economic Papers 1(1): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevile, JW (1970) Fiscal Policy in Australia: Theory and Practice. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cheshire.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (1975) Fiscal Policy in Australia: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed (revised). Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cheshire.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (1979) The Root of All Evil: Essays on Economics, Ethics and Capitalism. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Council of Churches.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (1983) The role of fiscal policy in the eighties. Economic Record 59(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevile, JW (1994) Economic rationalism: on throwing out the bathwater, but saving the baby. Australian Quarterly 66(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevile, JW (1998) Economic rationalism: social philosophy masquerading as economic science. In: Smyth, P, Cass, B (eds) Contesting the Australian Way: States, Markets and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–179.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (1999) Fiscal policy sixty years after Keynes. In: Kriesler, P (ed.) The Australian Economy. 3rd ed. St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (2000) Can Keynesian policies stimulate growth in output and employment? In: Bell, S (ed.) The Unemployment Crisis in Australia: Which Way Out? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–174.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW (2003) Fiscal policy. In: King, J (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 149–153.Google Scholar
Nevile, JW, Kriesler, P (2011) Why Keynesian policy was more successful in the fifties and sixties than in the last twenty years. Economic and Labour Relations Review 22(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevile, JW, Kriesler, P (2012) Dynamic Keynesian economics: cycling forward with Harrod and Kalecki. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36(6): 405–417.Google Scholar
Sen, A (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sen, A (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Swan, TW (1989) The principle of effective demand – a ‘real life’ model. Economic Record 65(4): 378–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar