Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T05:52:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strikes as Sequences of Interaction

The American Strike Wave of 1886

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Michael Biggs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theories of strikes—or any kind of conflict—are theories of interaction. Marxists envisage class conflict as a dialectical struggle between proletariat and bourgeoisie. Neoclassical economists imagine strikes as an unintended consequence of bargaining between rational actors.The tumult of class conflict is far removed from the quiet of rational bargaining, yet these theories are alike in this respect: strikes ensue from dyadic interaction. Adding political authorities to the dyad of workers and employers extends interaction to three sets of actors.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , Fall 2002 , pp. 583 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, Andrew (1995) “Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas.” Annual Review of Sociology 21: 93–113.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew, and Hrycak, Alexandra (1990) “Measuring resemblance in sequence data: An optimal matching analysis of musicians' careers.” American Journal of Sociology 96 (1): 144–85.Google Scholar
Allen, Ruth A. (1942) The Great Southwest Strike. University of Texas Publication No. 4214. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Johnson, George E. (1969) “Bargaining theory, trade unions, and industrial strike activity.” American Economic Review 59 (1): 35–49.Google Scholar
Avrich, Paul (1984) The Haymarket Tragedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, Michael (2001) Positive Feedback in Collective Mobilization: The American Strike Wave of 1886. University of Oxford Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No. 40. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Joseph R. (1903) The Story of a Labor Agitator. New York: The Outlook Co. Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., and Zorick, Ethan R. (1997) “Capabilities, perception, and escalation.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 15–27.Google Scholar
Camerer, Colin, and Thaler, Richard H. (1995) “Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2)209–19.Google Scholar
Card, David, and Olson, Craig A. (1995) “Bargaining power, strike durations, and wage outcomes: An analysis of strikes in the 1880s.” Journal of Labor Economics 13 (1): 32–61.Google Scholar
Chicago Department of Health (1885) Report of the Department of Health, City of Chicago for the Year 1885. Chicago: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Clegg, H. A., Fox, Alan, and Thompson, A. F. (1964) A History of British Trade Unions since 1889. Vol.1, 1889–1910. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Conell, Carol, and Cohn, Samuel (1995) “Learning from other people's actions: Environmental variation and diffusion in French coal mining strikes, 1890–1935.” American Journal of Sociology 101 (2): 366–403.Google Scholar
Cousineau, Jean-Michel, and Lacroix, Robert (1986) “Imperfect information and strikes: An analysis of the Canadian experience, 1967–82.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (3): 377–87.Google Scholar
Currie, Janet, and Ferrie, Joseph (2000) “The law and labor strife in the United States, 1881–1894.” Journal of Economic History 60 (1): 42–66.Google Scholar
David, Henry (1936) The History of the Haymarket Affair: A Study in the American Social-Revolutionary and Labor Movements. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. K. (1981) Strikes in the United States, 1881–1974. New York: St Martin's.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. K. (1989) “Strikes and politics in the United States, 1900–1919,” in Haimson, Leopold H. and Tilly, Charles (eds.) Strikes, Wars, and Revolutions in an International Perspective: Strike Waves in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 247–58.Google Scholar
Fantasia, Rick (1988) Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions of the United States and Canada (FOTLU) (1884) Report of the Fourth Annual Session in Chicago, Illinois, October 7, 8, 9, and 10, 1884. Chicago: FOTLU.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Raquel, and Glazer, Jacob (1991) “Striking for a bargain between two completely informed agents.” American Economic Review 81 (1): 240–52.Google Scholar
Fink, Leon (1983) Workingmen's Democracy: The Knights of Labor and American Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fink, Leon (1988) “The new labor history and the powers of historical pessimism: Consensus, hegemony, and the case of the Knights of Labor.” Journal of American History 75 (1) 115–36.Google Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto (1989) “One hundred years of strike statistics: Methodological and theoretical issues in quantitative strike research.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42 (3): 348–62.Google Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto (1995) The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Postwar Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frickey, Edwin (1947) Production in the United States, 1860–1914. Harvard Economic Studies, vol.82. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Gerald (1988) “Strike success and union ideology: The United States and France, 1880–1914.” Journal of Economic History 48 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Friedman, Gerald (1998) State-Making and Labor Movements: France and the United States, 1876–1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Schwartz, Anna J. (1982) Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their Relation to Income, Prices, and Interest Rates, 1867–1975. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galenson, Walter (1983) The United Brotherhood of Carpenters: The First Hundred Years. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry J. (1993) “Narrative, event-structure analysis, and causal interpretation in historical sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (5): 1094–1133.Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry J., Wallace, Michael E., and Rubin, Beth A. (1986) “Capitalist resistance to the organization of labor before the New Deal: Why? How? Success?” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 147–67.Google Scholar
Grodinsky, Julius (1957) Jay Gould: His Business Career, 1867–1892. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1963 [1932]) The Theory of Wages. 2d ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Illinois Bureau of Labor Statistics (IBLS) (1886) Fourth Biennial Report. Springfield: H. W. Rokker.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Bruce E. (1982) “The determinants of strikes in the United States, 1900–1977.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35 (4): 473–90.Google Scholar
Kealey, Gregory S., and Palmer, Bryan D. (1982) Dreaming of What Might Be: The Knights of Labor in Ontario, 1880–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennan, John, and Wilson, Robert B. (1993) “Bargaining with private information.” Journal of Economic Literature 31 (1): 45–104.Google Scholar
Klein, Maury (1987) Union Pacific: The Birth of a Railroad. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Knights of Labor, General Assembly (1974–75 [1887]) “Proceedings of the General Assembly of the Knights of Labor,” in Papers of Terence Vincent Powderly, 1864–1924, and Hayes, John William, 1880-1921, the Knights of Labor. Glen Rock, NJ: Microfilming Corp. of America.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J. (1993) “From repressive intervention to integrative prevention: The U.S. state's legal management of labor militancy, 1881–1978.” Social Forces 71 (3): 569–602.Google Scholar
McMurry, Donald L. (1953) “Labor policies of the General Managers' Association of Chicago, 1886–1894.” Journal of Economic History 13 (2): 160–78.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David (1980) “Strikes in nineteenth-century America.” Social Science History 4 (1): 81–104.Google Scholar
Nelson, Bruce C. (1988) Beyond the Martyrs: A Social History of Chicago's Anarchists, 1878–1900. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ozanne, Robert (1967) A Century of Labor-Management Relations at McCormick and International Harvester. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, Frank (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Albert R. (1969 [1886]) “Autobiography of Albert R. Parsons,” in Foner, Philip S. (ed.) The Autobiographies of the Haymarket Martyrs. New York: Pathfinder: 27–57.Google Scholar
Perrot, Michelle (1987) Workers on Strike: France, 1871–1890, Leamington Spa, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. (1977) Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Powderly, Terence V. (1886) Secret Circular, March 13, in Missouri Bureau of Labor Statistics and Inspection, The Official History of the Great Strike of 1886 on the Southwestern Railway System. Jefferson City, MO: Tribune Printing Co.: 69–75.Google Scholar
Rees, Albert (1952) “Industrial conflict and business fluctuations.” Journal of Political Economy 60 (5): 371–82.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, Joshua L. (1998) “Strikebreaking and the labor market in the United States, 1881–1894.” Journal of Economic History 58 (1): 183–205.Google Scholar
Ross, Stephen J. (1986) “The politicization of the working class: Production, ideology, culture and politics in late nineteenth century Cincinnati.” Social History 11 (2): 171–95.Google Scholar
Schneirov, Richard (1998) Labor and Urban Politics: Class Conflict and the Origins of Modern Liberalism in Chicago, 1864–97. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward, and Tilly, Charles (1974) Strikes in France, 1830–1968. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skeels, Jack W. (1982) “The economic and organizational basis of early United States strikes, 1900-1948.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35(4): 491–503.Google Scholar
Snyder, David (1975) “Institutional setting and industrial conflict: Comparative analyses of France, Italy, and the United States.” American Sociological Review 40 (3): 259–78.Google Scholar
Snyder, David (1977) “Early North American strikes: A reinterpretation.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 30 (3): 325–41.Google Scholar
Stromquist, Shelton (1987) A Generation of Boomers: The Pattern of Railroad Labor Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1996) “States and social movements: The political structuring of social movements,” in McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 41–61.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1989) “Introduction” to part 4, in Haimson, Leopold H. and Tilly, Charles (eds.) Strikes, Wars, and Revolutions in an International Perspective: Strike Waves in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 433–48.Google Scholar
Toharia, Luis (1979) “The division of labor and the historical development of the internal labor market: A case study of the McCormick Works of Chicago, 1848–1902.” Ph.D. diss., MIT.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1887) Third Annual Report: Strikes and Lockouts. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1906) Twenty-first Annual Report: Strikes and Lockouts. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Senate (1885) Testimony by Peter J. McGuire before United States Congress, Senate Committee on Education and Labor. Report of the Committee of the Senate upon the Relations between Labor and Capital and Testimony Taken by the Committee,1: 315–61. 48th Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Voss, Kim (1993) The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Louise Carroll (1987) Chicago's Pride: The Stockyards, Packingtown, and Environs in the Nineteenth Century. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978 [1922]) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar