Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T03:26:50.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analytic Narratives Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Extract

We welcome the animated debate raised by Analytic Narrativesconcerning social scientific methods and the scope of rational choice. Advocatesof mathematical and rational models have long claimed they have much to tell usabout situations where behavior can be quantified or where the situation understudy recurs many times. However, it was thought impermissible for rationalchoice theories (and rational choice) to venture into the analysis of bigevents. Political scientists like Gary King, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba(1994) implicitly conceded the issue by concentrating on the problem of caseselection when the number of cases is small but greater than one.We believeunique events are too important to leave aside, and we use rational choice,particularly game theory, as a means to study unique events.

Information

Type
Symposium on Robert H. Bates, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-LaurentRosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast's AnalyticNarratives
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

a1

Bates (1997) and Levi (1997) have already published their book-lengthmanuscripts. Weingast and Greif are working on theirs. Rosenthal’sarticle here was distinct from the work in the manuscript he has beencompleting.

References

Bates, R. H. (1997) Open Economy Politics: The Political Economy of the World Coffee Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geary, J. W. (1991) We Need Men: The Union Draft in the Civil War. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
King, G. R. Keohane, and Verba, S. (1994) Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, M. (1997) Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar