Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
We welcome the animated debate raised by Analytic Narrativesconcerning social scientific methods and the scope of rational choice. Advocatesof mathematical and rational models have long claimed they have much to tell usabout situations where behavior can be quantified or where the situation understudy recurs many times. However, it was thought impermissible for rationalchoice theories (and rational choice) to venture into the analysis of bigevents. Political scientists like Gary King, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba(1994) implicitly conceded the issue by concentrating on the problem of caseselection when the number of cases is small but greater than one.We believeunique events are too important to leave aside, and we use rational choice,particularly game theory, as a means to study unique events.
Bates (1997) and Levi (1997) have already published their book-lengthmanuscripts. Weingast and Greif are working on theirs. Rosenthal’sarticle here was distinct from the work in the manuscript he has beencompleting.