Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-54gsr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-30T05:28:46.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Michael Lynch
Michael Lynch
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There can be no doubt about the moral and epistemological significance of what Shapin (1988) calls the “physical place” of the scientific laboratory. The physical place is defined by the locales, barriers, ports of entry, and lines of sight that bound the laboratory and separate it from other urban and architectural environments. Shapin's discussion of the emergence of the scientific laboratory in seventeenth-century England provides a convincing demonstration that credible knowledge is situated at an intersection between physical locales and social distinctions. In this paper I take up Shapin's theme of the “siting of knowledge production,” but I give it a different treatment – one based on ethnomethodological studies of work (Garfinkel 1986; Garfinkel et al. 1981; Garfinkel et al. 1989; Livingston 1986; Liberman 1985; Lynch 1985a; Lynch et al. 1983; Bjelic and Lynch forthcoming; Morrison 1990; MacBeth 1989). Without denying all that can be witnessed in the spectacle of the scientist at the bench and of the architectural habitat of the bench, I argue that the “place” of scientific work is defined by locally organized topical contextures. The paper describes two examples of such spatial orders – “opticism” and “digitality” – associated with distinct complexes of equipment and practice. These topical spaces might initially be viewed as “ideal” or “symbolic” spaces, but I argue that they are no less material (and no less social) than the “physical setting” of the laboratory; indeed, they are the physical setting.

Information

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 1991 , pp. 51 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alpers, Svetlana. 1983. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Amann, Klaus, and Knorr-Cetina, K.. 1988. “The Fixation of Visual Evidence.” Human Studies 11(2–3):133–69. Reprinted in Lynch and Woolgar 1990, 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis. [1620] 1960. The New Organon and Related Writings, edited by Anderson, F. H.. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Barnes, S. B. 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, translated by Howard, Richard. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bastide, Françoise. 1990. “The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis,” translated by Myers, G.. In Lynch and Woolgar 1990, 187–230.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1969. Illuminations. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Bjelic, Dusan, and Lynch, Michael. Forthcoming. “The Work of a [Scientific] Demonstration: Respecifying Newton's and Goethe's Theories of Prismatic Color.” To appear in Not Everything Is in the Text, Yet There Is Nothing but the Text, edited by Watson, G. and Seiler, R.. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by Law, J., 196–223. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff. 1983. Rethinking Cognitive Theory. London and New York: Macmillan, St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Jeff. 1989. Mind in Action. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Edge, David, and Mulkay, Michael. 1976. Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel. 1975. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge, translated by Smith, A. M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1984. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1987. How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1989. “The Trading Zone: Coordination Between Experiment and Theory in the Modern Laboratory.” Paper presented at the International Workshop on the Place of Knowledge, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, 15–18 May 1989.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, ed. 1986. Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, Lynch, Michael, and Livingston, Eric. 1981. “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11:131–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, Livingston, E., Lynch, M., MacBeth, D., and Robillard, A. B.. 1989. “Respecifying the Natural Sciences as Discovering Sciences of Practical Action, I and II: Doing So Ethnographically by Administering a Schedule of Contingencies in Discussions with Laboratory Scientists and by Hanging around Their Laboratories.” Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Gerson, E., and Star, S. L.. 1988. “Representations and Re-representations in Scientific Work.” Unpublished paper, Tremont Research Institute, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London and Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. “Where the Action Is.” In his Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, 149–270. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. 1960. Art and Illusion. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gooding, David. 1986. “How Do Scientists Reach Agreement about Novel Observations?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17.Google Scholar
Gooding, David. 1988. “Mapping Experiment as a Learning Process.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of ScienceAmsterdam.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1964. The Field of Consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1987. Appearance and Reality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, Patrick A. 1983. Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janesick, J., and Blouke, B.. 1987. “Sky on a Chip: The Fabulous CCD.” Sky and Telescope 74(3):238–42.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1986. “Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands.” Knowledge and Society 6:1–40.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France, translated by Sheridan, Alan and Law, John. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Drawing Things Together.” In Representation in Scientific Practice, edited by Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S., 19–68. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. [1979] 1986. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage. Revised and reprinted by Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1989. “The Politics of Vision: Optics, Painting and Ideology in Germany, 1845–1880.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Ideology in the Life Sciences, Harvard-Fidia Lecture and Conference Series,Harvard University,April.Google Scholar
Liberman, Ken. 1985. Understanding Interaction in Central Australia: An Ethnomethodological Study of Australian Aboriginal People. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Livingston, Eric. 1986. The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1985a. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 1985b. “Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility.” Social Studies of Science 15:37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael, and Edgerton, Samuel Y.. 1988. “Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing.” In Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, edited by Fyfe, G. and Law, J., 184–220. Sociological Review Monograph 35. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, Livingston, Eric, and Garfinkel, Harold. 1983. “Temporal Order in Laboratory Work.” In Science Observed, edited by Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M., 205–80. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, and Woolgar, Steve, eds. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacBeth, Douglas. 1989. “The Floor as an Occasioned Object of Secondary Instruction, and as an Ordinary Organizational Thing.” Paper presented at the Eighty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association,San Francisco,August.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Smith, Colin. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Morrison, K. L. 1990. “Some Researchable Recurrences in Disciplinary-Specific Inquiry.” In The Interactional Order: New Directions in the Study of Social Order, edited by Helm, D. T., Anderson, W. T., Meehan, A. J., and Rawls, A. W., 141–57. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Newhall, Beaumont. 1964. The History of Photography. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1988. “Big Science as a Form of Life.” In The Restructuring of the Physical Sciences in Europe and the United States, 1945–1960, edited by de Maria, M. and Grilli, M.. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 1976. “The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760–1840.” History of Science 14:149–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “Notes on Methodology.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J., 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. “On Multiple Realities.” In The Problem of Social Reality, vol. 1 of Collected Papers, edited by Natanson, Maurice, 207–59. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.” Isis 79:373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1979. Talk's Body: A Mediation Between Two Keyboards. Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, Paul. 1988. “Representation and the Realist-Constructivist Controversy.” Human Studies 11(2–3): 117–32. Reprinted in Lynch and Woolgar 1990, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve. 1988. “Time and Documents in Researcher Interaction: Some Ways of Making Out What Is Happening in Experimental Science.” Human Studies 11(2–3):171–200. Reprinted in Lynch and Woolgar 1990, 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Andrew T. 1985. “What Color Is the Solar System?” Sky and Telescope, May: 399.Google Scholar
Yoxen, Edward. 1987. “Seeing with Sound: A Study of the Development of Medical Images.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J., 281–303. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar