Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T15:14:13.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why not believe in an evil God? Pragmatic encroachment and some implications for philosophy of religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

ANASTASIA PHILIPPA SCRUTTON
ANASTASIA PHILIPPA SCRUTTON*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK e-mail: t.scrutton@leeds.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pointing to broad symmetries between the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, and all-good, and the idea that God is omniscient, omnipotent, but all-evil, the evil-God challenge raises the question of why theists should prefer one over the other. I respond to this challenge by drawing on a recent theory in epistemology, pragmatic encroachment, which asserts that practical considerations can alter the epistemic status of beliefs. I then explore some of the implications of my argument for how we do philosophy of religion, arguing that practical and contextual as well as alethic considerations are properly central to the discipline.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 345 - 360
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abu-Raiya, Hisham, & Pargament, Kenneth (2012) ‘On the links between religion and health: what has empirical research taught us?’, in Cobb, M., Puchalski, C. M., and Rumbold, B. (eds) Oxford Textbook of Spirituality in Healthcare (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 333–340.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. (1993) Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Cahn, Stephen (1976) ‘Cacodaemony’, Analysis, 37, 69–73.Google Scholar
Clifford, William K. (1877) The Ethics of Beliefs, Reprinted in Lectures and Essays II (1879) (London: MacMillan Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Dein, Simon (2006) ‘Religion, spirituality and depression: implications for research and treatment’, Primary Care and Community Psychiatry, 11, 67–72.Google Scholar
Derose, Keith (1992) ‘Contextualism and knowledge attributions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52, 913–929.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Trent, & Rysiew, Patrick (2011) ‘Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions’, Synthese, 181, 395–403.Google Scholar
Fantl, Jeremy, & Mcgrath, Matthew (2007) ‘On Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75, 558–588.Google Scholar
Fantl, Jeremy, & Mcgrath, Matthew (2009a) ‘Advice for fallibilists: put knowledge to work’, Philosophical Studies, 142, 55–66.Google Scholar
Fantl, Jeremy, & Mcgrath, Matthew (2009b) Knowledge in an Uncertain World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, K. W. M., & Jackson, M. (1997) ‘Spiritual experience and psychopathology’, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 4, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, John, & Stanley, Jason (2008) ‘Knowledge and Action’, Journal of Philosophy, 105, 571–590.Google Scholar
Heriot-Maitland, Charles, Knight, Matthew, & Peters, Emmanuelle (2012) ‘A qualitative comparison of psychotic-like phenomena in clinical and non-clinical populations’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hick, John (1992) ‘The rationality of religious beliefs’, in Geivett, Douglas & Sweetman, Brendan (eds) Contemporary Perspectives on Religious Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 304–319.Google Scholar
Jackson, Lana, Hayward, Mark, & Cooke, Anne (2010) ‘Developing positive relationships with voices: a preliminary grounded theory’, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57, 487–495.Google Scholar
James, William (1896) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (New York NY: Longmans, Green, and Co.).Google Scholar
Koenig, Harold, King, Dana, & Carson, Verna B. (2012) Handbook of Religion and Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Law, Stephen (2010) ‘The evil-god challenge’, Religious Studies, 46, 353–373.Google Scholar
Loewenthal, Kate. 2007. Religion, Culture and Mental Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madden, Edward, & Hare, Peter (1968) Evil and the Concept of God (Springfield IL: C. Thomas).Google Scholar
New, Christopher (1993) ‘Antitheism’, Ratio, 6, 36–43.Google Scholar
Pargament, Kenneth, Koenig, Harold, & Perez, Lisa (2000) ‘The many methods of religious coping: development and initial validation of the RCOPE’, Journal of clinical psychology, 56, 519–543.Google Scholar
Pargament, K., Feuille, M., & Burdzy, D. (2011) ‘The Brief RCOPE: Current psychometric status of a short measure of religious coping’, Religions, 2, 51–76.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1967) God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Platvoet, Jan (2001) ‘Chasing off God: spirit possession in a sharing society’, in Harvey, Graham & MacLeod, Mary Ralls (eds) Indigenous Religious Musics (Aldershot: Ashgate), 122–135.Google Scholar
Rizzieri, Aaron (2011) ‘Pragmatic encroachment, high stakes, and religious knowledge’, International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 70, 217–229.Google Scholar
Rizzieri, Aaron (2013) Pragmatic Encroachment, Religious Belief, and Practice (New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Scrutton, Anastasia (forthcoming) ‘Can being told you're ill make you ill? A discussion of religion, psychiatry, and out of the ordinary experiences’, Think: Philosophy for Everyone.Google Scholar
Stein, Edward (1990) ‘God, the demon, and the status of theodicies’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 27, 163–167.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy (2005) ‘Contextualism, subject-sensitive invariantism, and knowledge of knowledge’, Philosophical Quarterly, 55, 213–235.Google Scholar
Wonder. 2006. Counselling from Hell, <http://www.bipolar.about.com/cs/choosepdoc/a/9910_counshell.htm> (accessed 2 July 2015).+(accessed+2+July+2015).>Google Scholar