Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T18:37:37.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schleiermacher's Hermeneutic and Its Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Richard L. Corliss
Richard L. Corliss
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, St Cloud State University, St Cloud, Minnesota 56301
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The critics of Schleiermacher's hermeneutic are legion and its defenders few – due, to a great extent, to the popularity of Gadamer's Truth and Method and its attack on Schleiermacher. I believe that the critics of Schleiermacher have not understood him very well and the failure of his hermeneutics to gain very much respect lies, at least partially, to a lack of understanding of what he had to say. Besides, if we look at contemporary scholars who focus on the study of language and how it functions we will find that they often have views very much like those found in Schleiermacher's discussion of hermeneutics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 363 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aquinas, Thomas (1945). The Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Vol. I. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brümmer, Vincent (1991). Philosophy, Theology and the Reading of Texts. Religious Studies XXVII, 451–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corliss, Richard L. (1981). ‘What Determines a Pragmatic Implication?’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy, XIX, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1985). Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad Publishing Company. [Originally published as Wahrheit und Methode by J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 1960.]Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and Conversation’. In Donald, Davidson and Gilbert, Harmon (Eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: Dickenson Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Hyers, Conrad (1984). The Meaning of Creation: Genesis and Modern Science. Atlanta: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Richard E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (1977). Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts, ed. and intro. by Heinz, Kimmerle (Duke, James and Forstman, Jack, trans.). Missoula: Scholars Press. (Pubished originally in 1959).Google Scholar
Searle, John (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar