Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T17:21:58.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dropping the debt: a new conundrum in Kant's rational religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2017

STEWART CLEM
STEWART CLEM*
Affiliation:
Department of Theology, University of Notre Dame, 130 Malloy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
*
e-mail: sclem@nd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I argue that Immanuel Kant fails to provide a satisfactory account of ‘moral debt’ in Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. More precisely, he fails to answer the question of why we should assume that a debt exists in the first place. In light of recent scholarship on this area of his thought, I sketch some possible readings of Kant on the nature of moral transformation that suggest how he might account for this debt. I then argue that these accounts fail to justify its existence within Kant's project.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 131 - 145
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Gary (2009) Sin: A History (New Haven CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2011) ‘The devil, the virgin, and the envoy: symbols of moral struggle in Religion, part two, section two’, in Höffe, Otfried (ed.) Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der Bloßen Vernunft (Klassiker Auslegen) (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), 111–129.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2012) ‘On defending Kant at the AAR’, Faith and Philosophy, 29, 144–150.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L. & Jacobs, Nathan (eds) (2008) In Defense of Kant's Religion (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Hare, John (1996) The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900–) Kant's gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Practical Philosophy. Gregor, Mary J. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology, Wood, Allen W. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings, Wood, Allen and di Giovanni, George (eds) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2014) ‘Kant's Jesus’, in Michalson, Gordon (ed.) Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 156–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline (1997) ‘Kant on grace: a reply to his critics’, Religious Studies, 33, 379–400.Google Scholar
Michalson, Gordon (1990) Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Muchnik, Pablo (2009) Kant's Theory of Evil: An Essay on the Dangers of Self-Love and the Aprioricity of History (Lanham MD: Lexington Books).Google Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2012) ‘Kant on the debt of sin’, Faith and Philosophy, 29, 30–52.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip (1986) ‘Christian atonement and Kantian justification’, Faith and Philosophy, 3, 440–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (2010) ‘Conundrums in Kant's rational religion’, in Cuneo, Terence (ed.) Enquiring about God: Selected Essays, I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 56–67.Google Scholar