Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-13T03:02:44.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuité dans la pensée hayekienne Une résistance planifiéecontre l’interventionnisme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Sandye Gloria-Palermo
Sandye Gloria-Palermo*
Affiliation:
Université de Saint-Étienne
Get access

Résumé

En contre-pied des interprétations mettant l’accent sur les ruptures ettransformations successives dans la pensée hayekienne, notre objectif est demettre en évidence un élément central de continuité dans l’analyseéconomique de Hayek. La constance de sa position normativeanti-interventionniste trouve une traduction dans le domaine positif del’analyse économique: l’ensemble des analyses de l’auteur repose surl’existence d’une tendance des forces du marché à se rapprocher d’uneconfiguration d’équilibre. Nous examinons comment cette proposition a étéexprimée sous forme de différentes hypothèses positives au sein de lathéorie des cycles, du débat sur la planification et de la théorie del’évolution culturelle.

Summary

Summary

Contrary to the interpretations that emphasise the ruptures andtransformations in the Hayekian thought, our objective is to stress onecentral element of continuity in the economic analyses of Hayek. Theconstancy of his normative anti-interventionist position finds a translationin the domain of positive economics: all his analyses rests upon theexistence of a tendency of the market process to converge toward anequilibrium position. We examine how this proposition expresses itself intodifferent positive assumptions in the cycle theory, the planning debate andthe theory of cultural evolution.

Keywords

HayekcyclesplanificationinstitutionsB31HayekcyclesplanificationinstitutionsB31

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , 2002 , pp. 313 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Llauteur est maître de conférences à l’Université de Saint-Étienne et rattachée au Creuset, 6 rue Basse des Rives, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2;gloria@univ-st-etienne.fr.

References

Bibliographie

Antonelli, E. (1953), «Le souvenir de Léon Walras: Léon Walras et Carl Menger à travers leur correspondance», Economic Appliquée, 6.Google Scholar
Arena, R. (1994), “Hayek and modem business cycle theory”, in Colonna, M. and Hagemann, H., (éds) (1994), Money and business cycles. The economics of F. A. Hayek, Vol. 1, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Arena, R. (1999), «Hayek et l’équilibre économique: une autre interprétation», Revue d’Economic Politique, 109 (6) nov-dec.Google Scholar
Butos, W.N. (1985), “Hayek and general equilibrium analysis”, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 52.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (1988), “Hayek’s transformation”, History of Political Economy, 20.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (1997), “Hayek and socialism”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXV, dec.Google Scholar
Desai, M. (1994), “Equilibrium, expectations and knowledge”, in Birner, J. et van Zijp, R., (éds) (1994), Hayek, co-ordination and evolution: his legacy in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (1995), Hayek’s political economy: the socio-economics of order, London and New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Fleetwood, S. (1996), “Order without equilibrium: a critical realist interpretation of Hayek’s notion of spontaneous order”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20.Google Scholar
Garrouste, P. (1999), «La firme hayekienne: entre institution et organisation», Revue d’Économie Politique, n° 6, dec.Google Scholar
Gloria-Palermo, S. (1998), “An Austrian dilemma: need and impossibility of a theory of institutions”, Review of Austrian Economics, 11, 1/2.Google Scholar
Gloria-Palermo, S. (1999), The evolution of Austrian economics: from Menger to Lachmann, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1931), Prices and production, London, George Routledge and sons ltd, traduction française, 1975, Prix et production, Paris, Calmann-Levy.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1933), Monetary theory and the trade cycle, Reprint of economic classics, 1966, New York, Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1935a), “The nature and history of the problem”, in Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1935), Collectivist economic planning: critical studies on the possibilities of socialism, London, Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1935b), “The present state of the debate”, in Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1935), Collectivist economic planning: critical studies on the possibilities of socialism, London, Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1937), “Economics and knowledge”, Economica, 4.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1941), The pure theory of capital, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1942), “Scientism and the study of society”, Economica, 9, 35–9, 36.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1944), The road to serfdom, London, Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1945), “The use of knowledge in society”, American Economic Review, 35, 4, réédité in von Hayek, F. A. (éd.) (1949).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1946), “The meaning of competition”, Conférence du 20 mai 1946 à l’Université de Princeton, réédité in Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1949).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1949), Individualism and economic order, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1952), The sensory order: an inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1967), Studies in philosophy, politics, and economics, Chicago, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1973), Law, legislation and liberty: a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy, 1: rules and order, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, traduction française, 1980, Droit, législation et liberté: règles et ordres, Paris, P.U.F.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1974), “The pretence of knowledge”, Nobel memorial lecture, The Nobel Foundation, réédité in Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1978).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1978), New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1978), “Competition as a discovery procedure”, in Hayek, F. A. von (éd.) (1978).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1979), Law, legislation and liberty: a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy, 3: The political order of a free people, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1988), The fatal conceit, London, Routledge, traduction française, 1993, La présomption fatale, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. (1981), The politics and philosophy of economics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
loannides, S. (1992), The market, competition and democracy: a critique of neo-Austrian economics, Brookfield, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1963), Market theory and the price system, Princeton, NJ, Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1988), “The Economic calculation debate: lessons for Austrians”, Review of Austrian Economics, 1.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1999), “Hedgehof or fox? Hayek and the idea of plan-coordination”, séminaire d’ouverture à la conférence en l’honneur du centenaire de la naissance de F. A. Hayek, Alessandria, Italie, mars.Google Scholar
Kurz, H. (1995), “Über “natürliche” und “künstliche” Storungen des all-gemeinen wirtschaftlichen Gleichgewichts: Friedrich August Hayeks monetare überinvestitionstheorie in “Preise und produktion”, publié in Schefold, et al. (éds) Friedrich, A. von Hayeks Preise und produktion, . Vademecum zu einem klassiker der marktkoordination, Dusseldorf, Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L. (1940), “A reconsideration of the Austrian theory of industrial fluctuations”, Economica, 7.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L. (1956), Capital and its structure, London, Bell and Sons ltd.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L. (1986), The market as an economic process, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. (1985), Rivalry and central planning: the socialist calculation debate reconsidered, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, T. (1994), “Realism and Hayek: a case of continuous, transformation”, in Colonna, M. and Hagemann, H., (éds) (1994), Money and business cycles. The economics of F. A. Hayek, 1, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Leroux, A. (1999), «Idéologie et science», in Leroux, A. et Marciano, A., (éds.), Traité de philosophie économique, Paris, Bruxelles, De Boeck Université.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1871), Grundsàtze der volkswirtschaftslehre, english translation, (1950), Principles of economics, Glencoe, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1883), Untersuchungen über die méthode der socialwissenschaf-ten und der politischen oekonomie insbesondere, English translation, (1963), Problems of economics and sociology, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, G. P. (1977), Economics as a coordination problem: the contributions of Friedrich A. Hayek, Kansas City, Sheet Andrews and Mc Meel, Inc.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margarlit, E. (1978), “Invisible hand explanations”, Synthèse, 39, 2.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1986), “Spontaneous market order and social rules: a critical examination of F. A. Hayek’s theory of cultural evolution”, Economics and Philosophy, 2.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1989), “Carl Menger’s evolutionary economics and John R. Commons’ collective action approach to institutions: a comparison”, Review of Political Economy, 1–1.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. (1980), “Economic calculation under socialism: the Austrian contribution”, Economic Inquiry, 18.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. (1994), Austrian economics in America: the migration of a tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899), The theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions, New York, MacMillan.Google Scholar
Wieser, F. von (1889), Der natürliche werth, English translation, (1893), Natural Value, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar