Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T18:57:43.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lamont Natural Radiocarbon Measurements V∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Edwin A. Olson  and
W. S. Broecker
Edwin A. Olson
Affiliation:
Lamont Geological Observatory (Columbia University) Palisades, New York
W. S. Broecker
Affiliation:
Lamont Geological Observatory (Columbia University) Palisades, New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article reports the radiocarbon age measurements made at the Lamont Geological Observatory between February 1957 and July 1958. For convenience the sample ages have been classified into the following categories:

  1. Table I Geologic Samples—North American glacial geology

  2. Table II Geologic Samples—Pluvial lake levels

  3. Table III Geologic Samples-Relative sealevel changes

  4. Table IV Geologic Samples-Oceanography

  5. Table V Geologic Samples-Miscellaneous

  6. Table VI Archaeologic Samples

  7. Table VII Check Samples

Within each table are subdivisions according to geographic origin.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 1 , 1959 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Broecker, W. S., and Kulp, J. L., 1957, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Science, v. 126, p. 1324–1334.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., Kulp, J. L., and Tucek, C. S., 1956, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements III: Science, v. 124, p. 154–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broecker, W. S., and Orr, P. C., 1958, Radiocarbon chronology of Lake Lahontan and Lake Bonneville: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 69, p. 1009–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Walton, A., in press, The geochemistry of C14 in the fresh water systems: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. Google Scholar
Bullen, R. P., and Sleight, F. W., in press, The Castle Windy site, Volusia County, Florida: DeLand, Florida, The Bryant Foundation.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D., 1954, An early upper Pleistocene site at the Kalambo Falls on the Northern Rhodesia-Tanganyika border: South African Archaeol. Bull., v. 9, p. 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. D. 1958, Early man in Africa: Sci. Am., v. 199, p. 76–83.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., 1956, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates I: Science, v. 124, p. 664–672.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1958, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 127, p. 1098–1105.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S. Jr., and Flint, R. F., 1957, Postglacial Hypsithermal interval: Science, v. 125, p. 182–184.Google Scholar
Deuel, T., 1957, The Modoc shelter: Illinois State Mus. Rept. Inv. 7 [reprinted (with revisions) from Nat. History, v. 66, no. 8, Oct. 1957].Google Scholar
Dreimanis, Aleksis, 1957, Stratigraphy of the Wisconsin glacial stage along the northwestern shore of Lake Erie: Science, v. 126, p. 166–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreimanis, Aleksis 1958, Wisconsin stratigraphy at Port Talbot on the north shore of Lake Erie, Ontario: Ohio Jour. Sci., v. 58, p. 65–84.Google Scholar
Drew, J. V., and Tedrow, J. C. F., 1957, Pedology of an Arctic brown profile near Pt. Barrow, Alaska: Soil. Sci. Soc. America Proc., v. 21, p. 336–339.Google Scholar
Fairbridge, R. W., 1958, Dating the latest movements of the Quaternary sea level: New York Acad. Sci. Trans., ser. II, v. 20, p. 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M. L., and Winters, H., 1956, Modoc rock shelter: Preliminary report: Illinois State Mus. Rept. Inv. 4.Google Scholar
Fyles, J. G., 1956, Surficial geology of the Horne Lake and Parksville map areas, Vancouver Island, British Columbia: Ph. D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Gadd, N. R., 1955, Pleistocene geology of the Becancour map area, Quebec: Ph. D. dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Gamble, E., 1958, Descriptions and interpretations of some Pleistocene sections in Wayne County, Indiana: Earlham Coll. Sci. Bull. 3.Google Scholar
Gigout, Marcel, 1954, Sur les alluvions récentes des oueds du Maroc océanique: Soc. géol. France Compte rendu Somm., no. 12, p. 266–267.Google Scholar
Goggin, J. M., 1952, Space and time perspective in Northern St. Johns archeology, Florida: Yale Univ. Pub. in Anthropology 47, 147 p.Google Scholar
Goldthwait, R. P., 1958, Wisconsin age forests in Western Ohio, I. Age and glacial events: Ohio Jour. Sci., v. 58, p. 209–219.Google Scholar
Karlstrom, T. N. V., 1952, Multiple glaciation of the upper Cook Inlet area, south-central Alaska [abs.]: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 63, p. 1269.Google Scholar
Karlstrom, T. N. V. in Péwé, T. L., and others, 1953, Multiple glaciation in Alaska—a progress report: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 289, p. 3–5.Google Scholar
Karlstrom, T. N. V. 1955, Late Pleistocene and Recent glacial chronology of south-central Alaska [abs.]: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 66, p. 1581–1582.Google Scholar
Karlstrom, T. N. V. 1957, Tentative correlation of Alaskan glacial sequences, 1956: Science, v. 125, p. 73–74.Google Scholar
Kulp, J. L., Feely, H. W., and Tryon, L. E., 1951, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements, I: Science, v. 114, p. 565–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulp, J. L., Tryon, L. E., Eckelman, W. R., and Snell, W. A., 1952, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements, II: Science, v. 116 p. 409–414.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1951, Radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 114, p. 291–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libby, W. F. 1954, Chicago radiocarbon dates V: Science, v. 120, p. 733–742.Google Scholar
McLearn, F. H., 1926, The Mesozoic and Pleistocene deposits of the lower Missinaibi, Opazatika, and Mattagami Rivers, Ontario: Canada Geol. Survey Summ. Rept., pt. C, p. 16–44 [1927].Google Scholar
Müller, F., in press, Beobachrungen uber Pingos, detailunter suchungen, in Ostgrönland und in der Kanadischen Arktis: Meddelelser om Gr⊘nland.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A., and Broecker, W. S., 1957, Validity of radiocarbon dates in organic samples with ages greater than 25,000 years [abs.]: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 68, p. 1775–1776.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A., and Broecker, W. S. 1958, Sample contamination and reliability of radiocarbon dates: New York Acad. Sci. Trans., ser. II, v. 20, p. 593–604.Google Scholar
Potratz, H. A., Barnes, J. W., and Lang, E. J., 1955, A radiochemical procedure for thorium and its application to the determination of ionium in coral limestone: U. S. Atomic Energy Comm. Rept. LA-1845.Google Scholar
Preston, R. S., Person, Elaine, and Deevey, E. S. Jr., 1955, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements II: Science, v. 122, p. 954–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radbruch, D. H., 1957, Hypothesis regarding the origin of thinolite tufa at Pyramid Lake, Nevada: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 68, p. 1683–1687.Google Scholar
Rafter, T. A., 1955, C14 variations in nature and the effect on radiocarbon dating: New Zealand Jour. Sci. Technology, sec. B, v. 37, p. 20–38.Google Scholar
Rubin, Meyer, and Suess, H. E., 1955, U. S. Geological Survey radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 121, p. 481–488.Google Scholar
Sackett, W. M., 1958, Ionium-uranium ratios in marine deposited calcium carbonates and related materials: Ph. D. dissertation, Washington University of St. Louis.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. L., 1958, Les Isles Marquises: Nat. History, v. 97, p. 262–271.Google Scholar
Steinbeck, J., and Ricketts, E. R., 1941, Sea of Cortez: New York, Viking Press, 598 p.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E., 1954, U. S. Geological Survey radiocarbon dates I: Science, v. 120, p. 467–473.Google Scholar
Suggs, R. C., 1958, Radiocarbon dates from the Manakaway site: Am. Antiquity, v. 23, no. 4, pt. 1, p. 432–433.Google Scholar
Tedrow, J. C. F., and Douglas, L. A., 1958, C14 dating of some Arctic soils: Rutgers Univ. Soils Dept., Mimeographed note.Google Scholar
Tedrow, J. C. F., Drew, J. V., Hill, D. E., and Douglas, L. A., 1958, Major genetic soils of the Arctic slope of Alaska: Jour. Soil Sci., v. 9, p. 33–45.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. S., 1952, Recent shore-line changes along the Pacific coast of Alaska: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 250, p. 523–548.Google Scholar
Vries, Hl. de, and Barendsen, G. W., 1954, Measurements of age by the carbon-14 technique: Nature, v. 174, p. 1138–1141.Google Scholar
Watt, A. K., 1954, Correlation of the Pleistocene geology as seen in the subway with that of the Toronto region Canada: Canada Geol. Assoc. Proc., v. 6, pt. 2, p. 69–81.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F., Krieger, A. O., and Albritton, C. C., 1955, The Midland discovery: Austin, University of Texas Press, 139 p.Google Scholar
Wise, E. N., and Shutler, Dick Jr., 1958, University of Arizona radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 127, p. 72–74.Google Scholar