Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-64p75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T10:13:12.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Proposed best-practice nutrition-related corporate reporting metrics for Australian food manufacturers, quick-service restaurants and retailers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2025

Jasmine Chan*
Affiliation:
Global Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
Ella Robinson
Affiliation:
Global Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Gary Sacks
Affiliation:
Global Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Jasmine Chan, 220 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia, jasmine.chan@deakin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To propose nutrition-related corporate reporting metrics for Australian packaged food manufacturers, retailers and quick service restaurants, and explore their feasibility of implementation.

Design:

Proposed metrics were developed based on: 1) a review of current corporate reporting frameworks and relevant literature to collate nutrition-related recommendations, metrics and principles of best practice reporting; and 2) adaptation of existing recommendations into reporting metrics. Interviews with representatives from 15 food companies were conducted to understand implementation considerations.

Setting:

Australia

Results:

There are a wide range of existing globally-applicable nutrition-related recommendations and reporting metrics for food companies. Based on nine key principles identified for best practice corporate reporting on nutrition, we devised 41 reporting metrics (including five flagged as priorities) tailored to food companies operating in Australia across five focus areas: ‘corporate strategy and governance’, ‘product formulation’, ‘nutrition labelling and information’, ‘promotion practices’, and ‘product accessibility and affordability’. Company representatives expressed support for the proposed metrics, noting that additional information technology infrastructure and resources would be required for their routine reporting by companies.

Conclusions:

The proposed set of reporting metrics offer evidence-based guidance for disclosure of nutrition-related actions by Australian food companies. The proposed metrics can inform government, public health groups and investors on best practice approaches to monitor corporate nutrition practices, and guide related policy decisions. Widespread implementation of the reporting metrics would be facilitated by integration with mandatory corporate sustainability reporting standards, with routine monitoring and enforcement by government, coupled with fit-for-purpose tools for comparing the healthiness of company product portfolios.

Information

Type
Research paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society