Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T10:09:41.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement of Conformity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

E. T. Katzoff
E. T. Katzoff*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Allport's J-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior and its attendant treatment of appropriate data are criticized on the following points: (1) narrowness of application; (2) flexibility of interpretation of results; (3) arbitrary selection of a criterion of conformity; (4) lack of a means by which the extent of conformity in one situation can be compared with that in another; (5) inequality of “telic” units. As an alternative treatment of such data, the method of higher moments is suggested and rationalized. Data from Allport and Solomon are reworked by this method and results compared.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1942 , pp. 31 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 1942 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Italics mine.

References

Allport, F. H. TheJ-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior. J. soc. Psychol., 1934, 5, 141–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, F. H. Rule and custom as individual variation of behavior distribution along a continuum of conformity. Amer. J. Sociol., 1939, 44, 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, F. H., and Solomon, R. S. Lengths of conversation; A conformity situation analyzed by the telic continuum andJ-curve hypothesis. J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1939, 34, 419–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, M., and Solomon, R. S. TheJ-curve hypothesis—Certain aspects clarified. Sociometry, 1938, 1, 277–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudycha, G. J. An examination of theJ-curve hypothesis based on punctuality distribution. Sociometry, 1937, 1, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1936.Google Scholar
Pearson, K., and Lee, A. On the law of inheritance of man. Biometrika, 1903, 2, 351–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, R. S. An index of conformity based on theJ-curve hypothesis. Sociometry, 1939, 2, 63–63.Google Scholar