Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T18:52:53.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Do You Desire? What Do You Fear? Theorize it!Teaching Political Theory through Utopian Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

Khristina Haddad
Affiliation:
Moravian College

Extract

Undergraduate students should not just study political theory. Theyshould theorize. Writing-intensive political theory courses can helpthem do so sooner. By preparing an original political vision, autopia or a dystopia, throughout the course of the semester,students read and compare the texts of the course against their ownemerging texts and move into more critical and systematic politicalanalysis. As a political theorist, my focus is not so much onutopias or dystopias as a subject of study per se,but on tapping into the creative freedom, critical distance, andhard-hitting insights of these traditions while teaching writing. Itake seriously Berlin's above-stated concern for the “place and modeof operation” conveyed to the student through the process oflearning to write. Visionary writing accelerates students'appreciation of the complexity of another's theory, but also oftheir own standpoint and capacity for agency and judgment.Khristina Haddad is assistant professor,department of political science, Moravian College. She teaches awriting-intensive course on visionary political writing and isaffiliated with German Studies and Women's Studies. Her researchinterests include politics of time and temporality, HannahArendt, political action, fear, feminist theory, women'sstudies, and, in particular, the politics of women'shealth.I am greatly indebtedto friends and colleagues who helped me along at various stagesincluding (in alphabetical order) Robert Humanick, Eleanor Linn,Bob Mayer, Karla Morales, Laurie Naranch, Gary Olson, MiguelinaOrtiz, Martha Reid, Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott, Lyman TowerSargent, Joel Wingard, and Elizabeth Wingrove. Thanks go also toall those whose dedicated work inspires student writers andteachers of writing at the Gayle Morris Sweetland Writing Centerat the University of Michigan, to helpful commentators at theSociety for Utopian Studies' Annual Meeting in Toronto, to twoanonymous reviewers at PS, and to three groupsof students who shared their visions with me.

Information

Type
THE TEACHER
Copyright
© 2005 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, James. 1996. “Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories.” In Composition in Four Keys: Inquiring into the Field, eds. Mark Wiley, Barbara Gleason, and Louise Weatherbee Phelps. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David. 1980. “Interdisciplinary Writing.” College English, 41 (March): 780.Google Scholar
Hjortshoj, Keith. 2001. Transition to College Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea. 1999. The New St. Martin's Handbook. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1985. The Prince. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Donald. 2003. “Teaching Writing as a Process Not a Product.” In Cross-Talk in Comp Theory—A Reader, ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1992. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Trans. Donald Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar