Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-31T13:36:54.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Political Science Really Young?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2005

Ido Oren
Ido Oren
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kim Quaile Hill (PS: Political Science and Politics, July 2004) seeks todebunk five “myths about the physical sciences” that “pose notable hurdles for appreciatingthe social sciences as legitimate scientific enterprise” (467). One of these myths is that“the physical sciences have always been highly successful in explaining their subjectmatter.” Hill complains that political science students are “ignorant of the history ofscience” and therefore they fail to “appreciate the differences between young and maturescientific disciplines…. If students can appreciate that all sciences were once youthful—aspolitical science still is today—they will have a useful perspective by which to understandwhy and how the knowledge base of our discipline is limited” (469).

Information

Type
Departments
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 3
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Flyvbjerg Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill Kim Quaile. 2004. “Myths About the Physical Sciences and Their Implications for Teaching Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (July): 467– 471.Google Scholar
Lowell A. Lawrence. 1910. “The Physiology of Politics.” American Political Science Review 4 (February): 1– 15.Google Scholar
Merriam Charles. 1926. “Progress in Political Research.” American Political Science Review 20 (February): 1– 13.Google Scholar
Munro William Bennett. 1928. “Physics and Politics—An Old Analogy Revised.” American Political Science Review 22 (February): 1– 11.Google Scholar
Taylor Charles. 1977. “Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.” In Understanding and Social Inquiry, eds. Fred Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Thiele Leslie P. 1997. Thinking Politics: Perspectives in Ancient, Modern and Postmodern Political Theory. Chatham House, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar