Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T03:39:47.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desperately Seeking Standards: The Court's FrustratingAttempts to Limit Political Gerrymandering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

Charles Backstrom ,
Samuel Krislov  and
Leonard Robins
Charles Backstrom
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Samuel Krislov
Affiliation:
American University
Leonard Robins
Affiliation:
Roosevelt University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By far the most significant form of gerrymandering is partisangerrymandering. It is painfully ubiquitous and yet can be covert,hidden in plain view. More importantly the advent of the computerand the growing polarization of the electorate have enhanced itsimportance. Already the House of Representatives has becomevirtually safe for most incumbents and in recent electionsexperienced less turnover than the Senate, which has far fewermembers and only one-third of its members up for reelection.

Information

Type
SPECIAL TO PS
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 409 - 415
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Backstrom, Charles, Leonard Robins, and Scott Eller. 1978. “Issues in Gerrymandering.” University of Minnesota Lakeview 62: 1134–59.Google Scholar
Backstrom, Charles, Leonard Robins, and Scott Eller. 1987. “Partisan Gerrymandering in the Post-Bandemer Era.” Constitutional Commentary 4: 285–318.Google Scholar
Baker, Gordan. 2005. “ Davis v. Bandemer.” In The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court, ed. Kermit Hall. New York: Oxford University Press, 252.Google Scholar
Baker v. Carr (1962) 369 U.S. 186 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, Michael. 2001. The Almanac of American Politics. Washington, D.C.: The National Journal.Google Scholar
Bush v. Gore (2000) 531 U.S. 98.Google Scholar
Davis v. Bandemer (1986) 478 U.S. 109.Google Scholar
Eggen, Dan. 2006. “Politics Alleged in Voting Cases,” Washington Post, Jan. 23, 2006, A1.Google Scholar
U.S. v. Carolene Products (1938) 304, U.S. 144, footnote four.Google Scholar
Henderson v. Perry (2005) _________ F. Supp. 2d _________Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pamela Karlan. 2004. “Where to Draw the Line: Judicial Review of Political Gerrymanders.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153: 541.Google Scholar
Karcher v. Daggett (1983) 462 U.S. 625.Google Scholar
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry (2006) __________________ U.S. ________________.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2001. “One Person One Vote: A Mantra in Need of Two Meaning.” North Carolina Law Review 80: 1259–78.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 2001. Breaking the Deadlock. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw v. Reno (1993) 509 U.S. 630.Google Scholar