Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T15:28:24.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Climate Change Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Thom Brooks
Thom Brooks*
Affiliation:
Durham University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Climate change represents one of our greatest public policy challenges. A broad, well-established and international scientific consensus exists that our planet is undergoing climate change. The question is not whether there is climate change, but how best to respond to it. Climate change is a global phenomenon that requires a global effort unlike anything previously attempted. This global challenge is complicated by related and more controversial questions about causal responsibility. Although convincing evidence shows that climate change is a result of human behavior, much less agreement exists on how this should factor into policy.

Information

Type
Symposium: Climate Change Justice
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 9 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brooks, Thom (ed.). 2008. The Global Justice Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom. 2012. “Climate Change and Negative Duties,” Politics 32: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Thom. 2013a. “The Real Challenge of Climate Change,” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1), this issue.Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom. 2013b. “In Defence of Political Theory: Impact, Opportunities, and Potential Threats.” Political Studies Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byravan, Sujatha, and Rajan, Sudhir Chella. 2010. “The Ethical Implications of Sea-Level Rise Due to Climate Change.” Ethics and International Affairs 24: 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, Simon. 2008. “Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change.” In The Global Justice Reader, ed. Brooks, T., 689–713. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2004. “Ethics and Global Climate Change.” Ethics 114 (April): 555–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2013. “The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1), this issue.Google Scholar
Heyward, Clare. 2013. “Situating and Abandoning Geoengineering: A Typology of Five Responses to Dangerous Climate Change.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1), this issue.Google Scholar
Kahn, Matthew E. 2010. Climatopolis: How Our Cities Will Thrive in the Hotter Future. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pachauri, Rajendra K., and Reisinger, Andy, eds. 2008. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2008. “Climate Change Justice.” Georgetown Law Journal 96: 1565–1612.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, David. 2013. “Political Challenges of the Climate-Changed Society.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1), this issue.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2002. One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, J., Cox, P., Haigh, J., Keith, D., Launder, B., Mace, G., MacKerron, G., Pyle, J., Rayner, S., Redgwell, C., and Watson, A.. 2009. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
Vanderheiden, Steve. 2013. “What Justice Theory and Climate Change Politics Can Learn from Each Other.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (1), this issue.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Mathis, and Rees, William E.. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar