Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T17:02:32.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case Studies and Analytic Transparency in Causal-Oriented Mixed-Methods Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2017

Jeb Barnes  and
Nicholas Weller
Jeb Barnes
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Nicholas Weller
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Symposium: The Road Less Traveled: An Agenda for Mixed-Methods Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 1019 - 1022
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

APSA Committee on Professional Ethics, Rights and Freedoms. 2002. A Guide to Professional Ethics in Political Edition, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available at: http://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/Publications/APSAEthicsGuide2012.pdf Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus. 2016. Causal Case-Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching and Tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 2008. “Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, ed. Box-Steffensmeiser, Janet, Brady, Henry, and Collier, David, 702–21. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew. 2010. “Process Tracing and Causal Inference.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, ed. Brady, Henry and Collier, David, 207–19. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey (eds.). 2015. Process Tracing in the Social Sciences: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry, and Collier, David. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (4): 823–30.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2013. “Going Where the Money Is: Strategies for Taxing Elites in Unequal Democracies.” World Development 47 (July): 42–57.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. “Reflections on Analytic Transparency in Process-Tracing Research.” Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 47–51.Google Scholar
Greene, Jennifer, Caracelli, Valerie, and Graham, Wendy. 1989. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluative Designs.” Educational Evaluation of Policy Analysis 11 (3): 235–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, David J., and Seefeldt, Kristin S.. 2013. “Mixed Methods and Causal Analysis.” In Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, ed. Morgan, Stephen, pp. 91–110. Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Jacobs, Alan. 2015. “Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach.” American Political Science Review 109 (4): 653–73.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido, and Rubin, Donald B.. 2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2010. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research.” World Politics 62 (1): 120–47.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2012. “The Logic of Process Tracing in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods and Research 41 (4): 570–97.Google Scholar
Miguel, Edward, and Kremer, Michael. 2004. “Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities.” Econometrica 72 (1): 159–217.Google Scholar
Nickerson, David W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 49–57.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weller, Nicholas, and Barnes, Jeb. 2014. Finding Pathways. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weller, Nicholas, and Barnes, Jeb. 2016. “Pathway Analysis and the Search for Causal Mechanisms.” Sociological Methods and Research 45 (3): 424–57.Google Scholar