Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T18:58:50.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Base Assumptions: The Complex Electoral Geography of Stateside US Military Installations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2025

Danielle L. Lupton Open the ORCID record for Danielle L. Lupton [Opens in a new window]  and
Jeremy M. Teigen
Danielle L. Lupton
Affiliation:
Colgate University, USA
Jeremy M. Teigen
Affiliation:
Ramapo College of New Jersey, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the 2020 presidential election, the Trump campaign incorrectly claimed that a lower-than-expected proportion of Republican votes among populations living on and near military bases signaled evidence of voter fraud. These claims rested on assumptions that military bases and their surrounding communities are strongholds for political conservativism––a belief held by scholars, pundits, and politicians alike. While the logic behind these arguments is appealing, it fails to consider the complexities surrounding military service and institutions, political geography, partisan preferences, and voting behavior. We directly test the notion that communities close to military bases will be and vote more Republican. Using three different but related empirical strategies that rely on a large dataset spanning 16 years, we find evidence contradicting the conventional wisdom. No consistent pattern across military installations exists. While some lean Republican, others lean Democratic, and the vast majority exhibit no party pattern at all. Our results carry implications for American civil–military relations and the maintenance of American democracy.

Information

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abascal, Maria, and Centeno, Miguel. 2017. “Who Gives, Who Takes? ‘Real America’ and Contributions to the Nation-State.” American Behavioral Scientist 61 (8): 832–60.10.1177/0002764217720966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Scott. n.d. “Congressional District Data Codebook.” Atlanta: Georgia State University. https://drive.google.com/file/d/14jaRKEVAGY3opM_1r_5bfIdjNu1HsC01/view.Google Scholar
Ambrosius, Joshua. 2016. “Blue City…Red City? A Comparison of Competing Theories of Core County Outcomes in U.S. Presidential Elections, 2000–2012.” Journal of Urban Affairs 38 (2): 169–95.10.1111/juaf.12184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankshain, Jessica, Cohn, Lindsay, and Lupton, Danielle. 2025. “I’m from the Government and I’m Here to Help: Public Perceptions of the Use of Coercive State Power.” American Political Science Review 119 (1): 384–401.10.1017/S0003055424000339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinni, Dante, and Gimpel, James. 2010. Our Patchwork Nation: The Surprising Truth About the “Real” America. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cooperative Election Study. “Common Content, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 Cross Sections.” Dataverse.harvard.edu.Google Scholar
Elinson, Zusha, and Randazzo, Sara. 2020. “Nevada Election Results: The 3,000 Challenged Votes.” Wall Street Journal, November 8. www.wsj.com/articles/nevada-election-results-the-3-000-challenged-votes-11604863720.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott. 2008. “The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 95–106.10.1017/S0003055408080027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott. 2009. “Evaluating Claims of Social Connection to International Conflict Casualties.” International Interactions 35 (3): 352–64.10.1080/03050620903084893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Jungyun, and DeFronzo, James. 2014. “Military Tradition, the Human Costs of War and the 2008 Election.” Armed Forces & Society 40 (4): 724–41.10.1177/0095327X12470805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William. 2014. “Is There a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 108 (4): 754–71.10.1017/S0003055414000380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Bruce, Magleby, David, Nelson, Candice, Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark, and Wolfinger, Raymond. 1986. “The Partisan Affinities of Independent ‘Leaners.’” British Journal of Political Science 16 (2): 155–85.10.1017/S0007123400003872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1996. “Why Context Should Not Count.” Political Geography 15 (2): 159–64.10.1016/0962-6298(95)00079-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, James, and Pedraza, Francisco. 2015. “Ties That Bind: Revisiting Context, Identity, and Attitudes.” Research & Politics 2 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard, Brown, Thad, and Sears, David. 1978. “Self-Interest and Civilians’ Attitudes Toward the Vietnam War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42 (4): 464–82.10.1086/268474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, Danielle, and Margulies, Max. 2020. “Trump’s Election Fraud Allegations Suggest Military Voters Uniformly Supported Him. It’s Not So.” The Washington Post Monkey Cage, November 18. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/18/trumps-election-fraud-allegations-suggest-that-military-voters-uniformly-supported-him-its-not-so.Google Scholar
Lupton, Danielle L., and Teigen, Jeremy M.. 2025. “Replication Data for ‘Base Assumptions: The Complex Electoral Geography of Stateside US Military Installations.’” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.7910/DVN/E45XY5.Google Scholar
Lyons, Jeffrey. 2011. “Where You Live and Who You Know: Political Environments, Social Pressures, and Partisan Stability.” American Politics Research 39 (6): 963–92.10.1177/1532673X11408233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Jeffrey. 2017. “The Family and Partisan Socialization in Red and Blue America.” Political Psychology 38 (2): 297–312.10.1111/pops.12336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motyl, Matt, Iyer, Ravi, Oishi, Shigehiro, Trawalter, Sophie, and Nosek, Brian. 2014. “How Ideological Migration Geographically Segregates Groups.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 51:1–14.10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Michael. 2023. Dangerous Instruments: Political Polarization and US Civil–Military Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Naveed. 2024. “Democrats, Remember: Veterans and Military Families Are Not a Monolithic Voting Bloc.” The Hill, April 14. https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4592283-democrats-remember-veterans-and-military-families-are-not-a-monolithic-voting-bloc.Google Scholar
Teigen, Jeremy, Shaw, Daron, and McKee, Seth. 2017. “Density, Race, and Vote Choice in the 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections.” Research & Politics 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017702989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist . 2021. “Military Bases Swung Hard Away from Republicans in 2020.” www.economist.com/united-states/2021/10/14/military-bases-swung-hard-away-from-republicans-in-2020.Google Scholar
Theys, Marissa, Krueger, James, and Pedraza, Francisco. 2020. “Identity Fusion and the Use of Force: A Group-Psychological Explanation for Support of Military Interventions.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (2): 381–95.10.1177/1065912919831786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lupton and Teigen supplementary material

Lupton and Teigen supplementary material
Download Lupton and Teigen supplementary material(File)
File 45.5 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Lupton and Teigen Dataset

Dataset

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/E45XY5
Link