Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T06:41:04.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Just Weight! The Case for Dynamic Party IdentificationWeighting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

Alan I. Abramowitz
Affiliation:
Emory University

Extract

Weighting survey data based on social background characteristics suchas age, education, gender, and race is a standard practice in publicopinion polling. By adjusting the composition of their samples toconform to known demographic characteristics of the population,pollsters greatly increase the accuracy of their results. However,with the exception of the Zogby Poll, most major pollingorganizations, including the Gallup Poll, have strongly opposedweighting their data based on party identification. This oppositionis understandable. Party identification is not a fixedcharacteristic of the electorate. It is a political attitude thatcan vary over time. As a result, most pollsters believe that thereis no way of accurately determining the underlying distribution ofparty identification in the population for weighting purposes.

Information

Type
FEATURES
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Green, Donald, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar