Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T19:11:07.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collaboration in Commissioned Research: Benefits and Challenges of Scholar–Practitioner Partnerships in Conflict Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Drew Mikhael Open the ORCID record for Drew Mikhael [Opens in a new window]  and
Julie Norman Open the ORCID record for Julie Norman [Opens in a new window]
Drew Mikhael
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast
Julie Norman
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Quantitative and Qualitative Collaborative Methodologies
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 554 - 557
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Asiamah, Gildfred, Awal, Mohammed S., and MacLean, Lauren M.. 2021. “Collaboration for Designing, Conceptualizing and (Possibly) Decolonizing Research in African Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleck, Jaimie, Dendere, Chipo, and Sangaré, Boukary. 2018. “Making North–South Research Collaborations Work.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 554–58.Google Scholar
Cyr, Jennifer. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology from a Skeptical but Nonetheless Sympathetic Point of View.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Pamina, and Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodologies: Why, How, and for Whom?” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology with Indigenous Communities: A Framework for Addressing Power Inequalities.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, Vince. 1999. “Tracking the Truth or Selling One’s Soul? Reflections on the Ethics of a Piece of Commissioned Research.” British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3): 275–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver. 2021. “Balancing Rigor and Relationships in Collaborative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelitch, Kristin. 2018. “Whose Research Is It? Political Scientists Discuss Whether, How, and Why We Should Involve the Communities We Study.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 543–45.Google Scholar
Pugh, Michael. 2004. “Peacekeeping and Critical Theory.” International Peacekeeping 11 (1): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Marina, and Hostettler, Ueli. 2015. “Conducting Commissioned Research in Neoliberal Academia: The Conditions Evaluations Impose on Research Practice.” Current Sociology 63 (4): 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar