Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T15:13:21.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption in the Central Division of Fiji

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2024

A. Palu
Affiliation:
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
J. Santos
Affiliation:
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
M. Shahid
Affiliation:
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
D. Coyle
Affiliation:
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
G. Waqa
Affiliation:
Pacific Research Centre for the Prevention of Obesity and Non-communicable Diseases, Fiji National University, Tamavua Campus, P.O Box 737, Suva, Fiji
A. Moala
Affiliation:
Pacific Research Centre for the Prevention of Obesity and Non-communicable Diseases, Fiji National University, Tamavua Campus, P.O Box 737, Suva, Fiji
C. Bell
Affiliation:
Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220 Australia
B.L. McKenzie
Affiliation:
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Availability of ultra-processed foods is likely to be high in the Pacific(1) however, information on consumption is limited. This study aimed to assess consumption levels and dietary sources of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) in a population of adults in the Central Division of Fiji. A random sample of 700 adults was selected from two statistical enumeration areas (one semi-urban, one rural) in Fiji. Participant characteristics were collected, along with a three-pass 24-hour diet recall. Foods consumed were coded based on level of processing, in alignment with the NOVA categorisation system (1 = unprocessed, 2 = minimally processed,3 = processed and 4 = ultra-processed). UPF contribution to total energy, salt, fat, and sugar intake were estimated. Main sources of UPFs were then estimated by food group. 534 adults participated (76% response rate, 50% female). Preliminary results suggest that UPFs contributed 21.5% (%95 CI, 19.5% to 23.4%) of total energy intake. Further, UPFs contributed to 22.8% (%95CI 20.5% to 25.1%) of total salt intake, 24.0% (%95 CI, 21.4% to 26.6%) of fat intake and 18.6% (%95 CI, 16.5% to 20.7%) of sugar intake. UPFs contributed over 20% of total energy intake in this sample of Fijian adults and over 20% of salt, fat, and sugar. Messages and interventions that encourage consumption of minimally processed foods while reducing consumption of UPFs are likely needed to improve the healthiness of diets.

References

Sievert, K, Lawrence, M, Naika, A & Baker, P (2019). Nutrients 1(1328).Google Scholar