Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-2r8x7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T02:42:47.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social media use for nutrition-related information and dietary behaviours: a cross-sectional survey of Australian young adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2025

E. Denniss
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
R. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
G. Abbott
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
S.A. McNaughton
Affiliation:
Health and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Generally, young adults in Australia have poor diet quality, increasing their risk of chronic disease(1). Young adults use social media for nutrition-related information (SMNI), including recipes, product details and dietary advice(2,3). Such social media use may have implications for nutrition knowledge, confusion, and backlash towards nutrition science, which could impact dietary behaviours including diet quality and restrained eating. The purpose of this study was to examine young adults’ use of SMNI, and the association between nutrition-related social media use, diet quality and restrained eating and the role of potential mediators. A cross-sectional survey of young adults (aged 22–29) living in Australia was conducted (n = 200). The exposure variable, use of SMNI, was measured using questions adapted from existing measures investigating sources of health- and nutrition-related information. Outcome measures, diet quality and dietary restraint, and mediator variables nutrition knowledge, confusion, backlash, and social comparison were measured using established measures. Mediation analyses were conducted using path analysis. One hundred and eleven young adults (55.5%) reported using SMNI at least once within the last year and 93 (46.5%) within the last month. Recipes was reported as the main reason for use. Use of SMNI within the last month was positively associated with nutrition knowledge (β = 0.19 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.32]), which was positively associated with diet quality (β = 0.25 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.38]). There was a positive indirect effect between SMNI and diet quality, via nutrition knowledge (Ind = 0.05 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.09]), providing evidence of mediation. Nutrition confusion was positively associated with backlash (β=0.46 [95% CI: 0.34, 0.59]), which was negatively associated with diet quality (β = −0.31 [95% CI: −0.47, −0.15]). Use of SMNI was not significantly associated with restrained eating. Almost half of the young adults in this study reported use of SMNI at least once in the last month and recipes was the most common type of information sought. This finding is consistent with the literature(2,3) and indicates that social media is a popular source of nutrition-related information and recipe content among young adults. SMNI was positively associated with diet quality and was mediated by nutrition knowledge. These findings suggest that social media may be an important tool to distribute high quality nutrition-related information and for nutrition promotion aimed at young adults, however, experimental research is required to investigate causal pathways. The growth and ubiquity of social media and its potential for effective and wide-reaching nutrition promotion highlight social media as a priority area for research in the field of public health nutrition and aligns with the priority area outlined in the Decadal Plan for the Science of Nutrition to harness the reach of social media for nutrition promotion(4).

Information

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Allman-Farinelli, M, Partridge, SR, Roy, R (2016) Curr Obes Rep 5(1), 2329.10.1007/s13679-016-0189-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M, Chivers, P, Farringdon, F (2019) Health Promot J Austr 30(1), 6675.10.1002/hpja.180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, MSC, Molenaar, A, Brennan, L et al. (2022) J Med Internet Res 24(1), e23656.Google Scholar
National Committee for Nutrition (2019) Nourishing Australia: A decadal plan for the science of nutrition https://www.science.org.au/supporting-science/science-policy-and-analysis/decadal-plans-science/nourishing-australia-decadal-plan Google Scholar