Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T07:24:24.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reformulation of children’s breakfast cereals: repeated cross-sectional analysis of products in the UK from 2020 to 2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2025

N.A. Barakat
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
Z. Davies
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
S. Pombo-Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
M. Tan
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
K.M. Hashem
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Excessive calorie, sugar and salt intake in children’s diets is a public health concern(1). The UK government introduced voluntary salt(2) and sugar(3) reduction programmes to improve the nutritional content of key food categories. Breakfast cereals are an important breakfast choice in children’s diet and are frequently marketed using child-appealing packages(4). This study aims to assess the impact of these initiatives on improving breakfast cereals with child-appealing packaging from 2020 to 2023.

We conducted repeated cross-sectional surveys yearly from 2020 to 2023, collecting data on energy, total sugars, fibre, and salt content per 100g from the nutrition information panel of breakfast cereals available in nine major UK retailers and meeting the child-appealing packaging (e.g. cartoons) criteria(5). Statistical analysis, including the Friedman test and χ2 tests, was performed to assess changes in nutritional content over time and compliance with the salt and sugar reduction programmes.

Total number of breakfast cereals surveyed each year were n=119, n=126, n=138, and n=133, respectively, with 80 products consistently surveyed (matched) across all four years. Matched breakfast cereals (n=80) showed statistically significant reductions in median total sugars and salt content in 2023 compared to 2020: median (Interquartile Range) total sugars reduced from 22g/100g (15.6-25.9) in 2020 to 19.9g/100g (15.5-22.6) in 2023 (P<0.001), and median (IQR) salt reduced from 0.50g/100g (0.28-0.70) in 2020 to 0.43g/100g (0.24-0.65) in 2023, (P=0.037). No significant changes were observed in energy or fibre contents, (p>0.05). Despite the modest reductions, 81% of breakfast cereals (n=133) collected in 2023 continued to exceed the recommended sugar reduction guideline (12.3g/100g), while only 6% exceeded the maximum salt target (0.90g/100g). Additionally, around 40% of breakfast cereals cereals in 2023 contained a third (per 30g) of a 4-6-year-old’s maximum daily recommendation of free sugars (19 g/d). There were significant variations in sugar, fibre and salt content between and across different retailers and manufacturers (P<0.05).

Our findings show modest yet ongoing reductions in sugar and salt content since 2020, demonstrating the potential feasibility of reformulating breakfast cereals. However, breakfast cereals with child-appealing packaging continue to be a major source of sugar in children’s diets. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for mandatory and comprehensive sugar reduction policies to effectively reduce children’s sugar consumption. Additionally, regulatory measures should be introduced to ensure companies use child-appealing tactics on their healthiest breakfast cereals to improve children’s food preferences, and diet. These steps are essential, building on the potential impact of the UK voluntary reduction programmes to improve children’s health and help reduce childhood obesity.

Information

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Department of Health and Social Care (2017) Childhood obesity: a plan for action [Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childhood-obesity-a-plan-for-action/childhood-obesity-a-plan-for-action]Google Scholar
Public Health England (PHE) (2017) Salt Reduction Targets for 2017 [Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a75653fe5274a1baf95e3d6/Salt_reduction_targets_for_2017.pdf]Google Scholar
Public Health England (PHE) (2015) Sugar Reduction the Evidence for Action [Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f928c40f0b623026904b7/Sugar_reduction_The_evidence_for_action.pdf]Google Scholar
Cairns, G, Angus, K, Hastings, G, Caraher, M (2013). Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary. Appetite. 2013;62:209–15.Google Scholar
Mulligan, C, Potvin Kent, M, Vergeer, L, Christoforou, AK, L’Abbé, MR (2021). Quantifying Child-Appeal: The Development and Mixed-Methods Validation of a Methodology for Evaluating Child-Appealing Marketing on Product Packaging. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4769. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar