Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T09:43:32.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment and prediction of human milk intake in late infancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2025

L. Daniels
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
A.L. Heath
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
R. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
B. Bruckner
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
J. Haszard
Affiliation:
Haszard Biostatistics, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The significance of human milk in an infant’s diet is well-established, yet accurately measuring human milk intake remains challenging. Current methods are either unsuitable for large-scale studies, such as the dose-to-mother stable isotope technique, or rely on set amounts of human milk, regardless of known variability in individual intake(1). There is a paucity of data on how much infants consume, particularly in later infancy (>6 months) when complementary foods have been introduced. This research aimed to estimate human milk intakes and total infant milk intakes (including infant formula) in New Zealand infants aged 7-10 months, explore factors that predict these intakes, and develop and validate equations to predict human milk intake using simple measures. Human milk intake data were obtained using the dose-to-mother stable isotope technique in infants aged 7-10 months and their mothers as part of the First Foods New Zealand study (FFNZ)(2). Predictive equations were developed using questionnaire and anthropometric data (Model 1) and additional dietary data from diet recalls (Model 2)(3). The validity of existing methods to estimate human milk intake (NHANES and ALSPAC studies) was compared against the dose-to-mother results. FFNZ included 625 infants, with 157 mother-infant dyads providing complete data for determining human milk volume. Using the dose-to-mother data, the measured mean (SD) human milk intake was 785 (264) g/day. Older infants had lower human milk and total milk intakes, male infants consumed more total milk. The strongest predictors of human milk intake were infant age, infant body mass index, number of breastfeeds a day, infant formula consumption, and energy from complementary food intake. When the predictive equations were tested, mean (95% CI) differences in predicted versus measured human milk intake (mean, [SD]: 762 [257] mL/day) were 0.0 mL/day (-26, 26) for Model 1 and 0.5 mL/day (-21, 22) for Model 2. In contrast, the NHANES and ALSPAC methods underestimated intake by 197 mL/day (-233, -161) and 175 mL/day (-216, -134), respectively. The predictive equations are presented as the Human Milk Intake Level Calculations (HuMILC) tool, designed for use in large-scale studies to more accurately estimate human milk intakes of infants. The use of objective quantifiable assessment methods enhances our understanding of infant human milk intakes, improving our ability to accurately assess nutritional adequacy in infants.

Information

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Daniels, L, Gibson, RS, Diana, A, Haszard, JJ, et al. (2019) Am J Clin Nutr 9(169), 2227–10Google Scholar
Taylor, RW, Conlon, CA, Beck, KL, von Hurst, PR, et al. (2021) Jmir Res Protoc 10(4), e29048Google Scholar
Haszard, JJ, Heath, ALM, Taylor, RW, Bruckner, B, et al. (2024) Am J Clin Nutr 120(1), 102–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar