Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T01:50:54.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models of AGN feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Françcoise Combes
Françcoise Combes*
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, 61 Av. de l'Observatoire F-75 014 Paris, France email: francoise.combes@obspm.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The physical processes responsible of sweeping up the surrounding gas in the host galaxy of an AGN, and able in some circumstances to expel it from the galaxy, are not yet well known. The various mechanisms are briefly reviewed: quasar or radio modes, either momentum-conserving outflows, energy-conserving outflows, or intermediate. They are confronted to observations, to know whether they can explain the M-sigma relation, quench the star formation or whether they can also provide some positive feedback and how the black hole accretion history is related to that of star formation.

Keywords

galaxies: elliptical and lenticularcD - galaxies: evolution - galaxies: formation

Information

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S309: Galaxies in 3D across the Universe , July 2014 , pp. 182 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Aalto, S., Garcia-Burillo, S., Muller, S.et al., 2012, A&A 537, A44Google Scholar
Angles-Alcazar, D., Ozel, F., & Davé, R., 2013, ApJ 770, 5Google Scholar
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C., 2013, ApJ 770, 57Google Scholar
Brueggen, M., Heinz, S., Roediger, E., et al., 2007, MNRAS 380, L67Google Scholar
Canning, R. E. A., Ryon, J. E., Gallagher, J. S., et al., 2014, MNRAS in press, arXiv1406.4800Google Scholar
Cattaneo, A. & Teyssier, R., 2007, MNRAS 376, 1547Google Scholar
Cicone, C., Maiolino, R., Sturm, E., et al., 2014, A&A 562, A21Google Scholar
Combes, F., Garcia-Burillo, S., Casasola, V., et al., 2013, A&A 558, A124Google Scholar
Costa, T., Sijacki, D., & Haehnelt, M. G., 2014, MNRAS in press arXiv1406.2691Google Scholar
Dasyra, K. & Combes, F., 2012, A&A 541, L7Google Scholar
Dubois, Y., Devriendt, J., Slyz, A., & Teyssier, R., 2010, MNRAS 409, 985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Y., Pichon, C., Devriendt, J., et al., 2013, MNRAS 428, 2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, A. C., Stewart, G. C., & Fabian, A. C., 1992, MNRAS 258, 177Google Scholar
Fabian, A. C., 2012, ARAA 50, 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faucher-Giguère, C-A. & Quataert, E., 2012, MNRAS 425, 605Google Scholar
Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., Piconcelli, E., et al., 2010, A&A 518, L155Google Scholar
Gabor, J. & Bournaud, F., 2014, MNRAS 441, 1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspari, M., Melioli, C., Brighenti, F., & D'Ercole, A., 2011, MNRAS 411, 349Google Scholar
Gaspari, M., Brighenti, F., & Temi, P., 2012, MNRAS 424, 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., et al., 2009, ApJ 698, 198Google Scholar
Hopkins, P., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al., 2006, ApJS 163, 1Google Scholar
Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C., 2013, ARAA 51, 511Google Scholar
Krolik, J. H., McKee, C. F., & Tarter, C. B., 1981, ApJ 249, 422Google Scholar
Maiolino, R., Gallerani, S., Neri, R., et al., 2012, MNRAS 425, L66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, B. R., Kazemzadeh, F., Rafferty, D. A., et al., 2009, ApJ 698, 594Google Scholar
Morganti, R., Fogasy, J., Paragi, Z., et al., 2013, Science 341, 1082Google Scholar
Nayakshin, S., 2014, MNRAS 437, 2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proga, D. 2003, ApJ 585, 406Google Scholar
Proga, D. 2005, ApJ 630, L9Google Scholar
Revaz, Y., Combes, F., & Salomé, P., 2007, A&A 477, L33Google Scholar
Salomé, P., Combes, F., Edge, A., et al., 2006, A&A 454, 437Google Scholar
Salomé, P., Combes, F., Revaz, Y., et al., 2008, A&A 484, 317Google Scholar
Schawinski, K., Urry, C. M., Simmons, B. D., et al., 2014, MNRAS 440, 889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J., 2005, MNRAS 364, 1337Google Scholar
Smajic, S., Moser, L., Eckart, A., et al., 2014, A&A in press, arXiv1404.6562Google Scholar
Springel, V., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L., 2005, MNRAS 361, 776Google Scholar
Thacker, R. J., MacMackin, C., Wurster, J., & Hobbs, A., 2014, MNRAS in press, arXiv1407.0685Google Scholar
Tombesi, F., Cappi, M., Reeves, J. N., et al., 2010, A&A 521, A57Google Scholar
Tombesi, F., Tazaki, F., Mushotzky, R. F., et al., 2014, MNRAS in press arXiv1406.7252Google Scholar
Wagner, A. Y. & Bicknell, G. V., 2011, ApJ 728, 29Google Scholar
Wild, V., Heckman, T., & Charlot, S., 2010, MNRAS 405, 933Google Scholar
Zubovas, K. & King, A., 2012, ApJ 745, L34Google Scholar
Zubovas, K. & King, A., 2014, MNRAS 439, 400Google Scholar