Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T20:37:31.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A SCRUM AGILE INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

H. Thiele ,
S. Weber ,
J. Reichwein ,
J. A. Bartolo ,
Y. Tchana ,
L. Jimenez  and
J. C. Borg
H. Thiele*
Affiliation:
Paderborn University, Germany
S. Weber
Affiliation:
Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany
J. Reichwein
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
J. A. Bartolo
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Y. Tchana
Affiliation:
University of Technology of Troyes, France
L. Jimenez
Affiliation:
Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard, France
J. C. Borg
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
*
*henrik.thiele@hni.upb.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With design methodologies, as Integrated Product Development, industry is continuously looking to improve their product development processes. Staying ahead concurrence forces them to deliver new and more complex products in shorter time. When it comes to fast delivery and requirement changes, product development can be inspired by agile methods. Although the application is difficult, the idea to implement these methods for development of products other than software comes out. To ease its implementation, this paper proposes to use IPD as a framework for agile product development.

Keywords

integrated product developmentagilityagile-stage-gate hybriddesign methodsdesign education

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 747 - 756
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahmed-Kristensen, S. and Faria, L. (2018), “Hybrid Agile-Planned product development processes: Preparing the manufacturing sector for industry 4.0”.Google Scholar
Albers, A. (2010), “Five Hypotheses about Engineering Processes and their Consequences”, in: Proceedings of the TMCE 2010. Presented at the TMCE, Ancona, Italy.Google Scholar
Albers, A. et al. (2016), “IPeM-Integrated Product Engineering Model in Context of Product Generation Engineering”, in: Procedia CIRP. Presented at the 26th CIRP Design Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 100–105. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000060192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, M. and Hein, L. (1987), Integrated Product Development, Springer.Google Scholar
Atzberger, A. et al. (2019), “Evolution of the Hype around Agile Hardware Development”, Presented at the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2019.8792637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzberger, A. and Paetzold, K. (2019), “Current Challenges of Agile Hardware Development: What are Still the Pain Points Nowadays?”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1, pp. 2209–2218. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K. (2001), “Manifesto for Agile Software Development”, http://www.agilemanifesto.org/Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T.M. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer-Verlag, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhmer, A.I., Beckmann, A. and Lindemann, U. (2015), Open Innovation Ecosystem - Makerspaces within an Agile Innovation Process 11.Google Scholar
Conforto, E.C. and Amaral, D.C. (2016), “Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 40, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2019), “The drivers of success in new-product development”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 76, pp. 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2016), “Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrids: The Next Stage for Product Development”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 59, pp. 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1117317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2013), Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, 5th ed. Hanser, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I., Hentze, J. and Bruckmann, T. (2018), “V-Models for Interdisciplinary Systems Engineering”, Presented at the 15th International Design Conference, pp. 747–756. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I., Scholle, P. and Pottebaum, J. (2017), “Integrated Process and Data Model for Agile Strategic Planning”, Presented at the 11th International Workshop on Integrated Design Engineering, Magdeburg.Google Scholar
Luedeke, T.F. et al. (2018), “CPM / PDD in the context of Design Thinking and Agile Development of Cyber-Physical Systems [WWW Document]”, DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th - 17th August 2018. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/40906/CPM+%2F+PDD+in+the+context+of+Design+Thinking+and+Agile+Development+of+Cyber-Physical+Systems (accessed 2.12.20).Google Scholar
Montero, J. et al. (2019), “Enhancing the Additive Manufacturing process for spare parts by applying Agile Hardware Development principles”, in: Presented at the 2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT), IEEE, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIMT.2019.8712045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, F. (1985), “Integrerad Produktutveckling – Arbetsmodel”, Produktutveckling, Sveriges Mekanförbundet 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, S. (2004), “Dynamic product development—DPD”, Technovation, Vol. 24, pp. 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00077-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G. et al. (2007), Engineering Design. Springer London, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K.S. (2012), Essential Scrum: A practical guide to the most popular Agile process, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. et al. (2019), Agile Development of Physical Products - An Empirical Study about Potentials, Transition and Applicability, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S. et al. (2017), “Agile development and the constraints of physicality: a network theory-based cause-and-effect analysis”, in: DS 87-4 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 4: Design Methods and Tools, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017, pp. 199–208.Google Scholar
Sommer, A.F. et al. (2015), “Improved Product Development Performance through Agile/Stage-Gate Hybrids: The Next-Generation Stage-Gate Process?”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 58, pp. 34–45. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5801236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vajna, S. (Ed.), (2014), Integrated Design Engineering: ein interdisziplinäres Modell für die ganzheitliche Produktentwicklung, Springer Vieweg, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-41104-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VDI, (2004), Guideline 2206: Design methodology for mechatronic systems.Google Scholar
VDI, (1993), Guideline 2221: Systematic approach to the development and design of technical systems and products.Google Scholar