Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T19:33:07.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DECISION OF CONVENTIONAL/HYBRID LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN STRATEGIES AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE DESIGN PROCESS

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

P. Schmitt  and
K. Gericke
P. Schmitt*
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
K. Gericke
Affiliation:
University of Rostock, Germany
*
*pascal.schmitt@uni-rostock.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lightweight design (LWD) is partly reaching its limits. New technologies must not only be used to make products more functional, but also to make LWD more efficient. Here additive manufacturing (AM) should be named. Potentials of the use in LWD are not yet clear. In this work, existing LWD strategies and their location in the design process are presented. Criteria are worked out which influence the design process and the use of LWD strategies. The use of AM in (hybrid) LWD will be investigated in order to overcome design trade-offs and what influence its use could have on the design process.

Keywords

lightweight designhybrid lightweight designadditive manufacturingdesign process

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1095 - 1104
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ashby, M.F. (2016), Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Vol. 5, ISBN: 9780081005996.Google Scholar
ASTM International (2012), “ASTM International, ‘ASTM F2792 - 12a Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies,’”. https://doi.org/10.1520/F2792-12ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecker, T. and Abdelkafi, N. (2006), “Complexity and variety in mass customization systems: Analysis and recommendations”, Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 7, pp. 908–929. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610680596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruth, M.A., Allwood, J.M. and Moynihan, M.C. (2011), “The technical potential for reducing metal requirements through lightweight product design”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 57, pp. 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M.A., Eliashberg, J. and Ho, T.-H. (1996), “New Product Development: The Performance and Time-to-Market Tradeoff”, Source: Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.2.173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberger, S. et al. (2013), “Recycling, Life-Cycle-Assessment und Rohstoffverfügbarkeit”, in Leichtbau in der Fahrzeugtechnik. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp. 727–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-2110-2_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, A. (2012), Additive Manufacturing, 3D Printing, and the Coming Stock Market Boom, 3rd Edition Elder.com e-book Series.Google Scholar
Ellenrieder, G. et al. (2013), “Die Leichtbaustrategien”, in Leichtbau in der Fahrzeugtechnik. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 43–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-2110-2_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., Kleemann, S. and Vietor, T. (2014), “Smart Production of Hybrid Material Automotive Structures at ForschungsCampus Wolfsburg in the ‘Open Hybrid LabFactory’”, ITHEC 2014 - International Conference and Exhibition on Thermoplastic Composites.Google Scholar
Hackl, H. and Bruckner, J. (2013), “Auswirkungen des Multimaterial-Leichtbaus auf die Fügetechnik”, ATZ - Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift. Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 115 No. 10, pp. 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35148-013-0279-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, A., Kirwan, B. and Kjellén, U. (2007), “Safe by design: where are we now?”, Safety Science, Vol. 45 No. 1-2, pp. 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, F. and Moeller, E. (2011), Handbuch Leichtbau - Methoden, Werkstoffe, Fertigung, Handbuch Leichtbau . Hanser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenow, G. and Meißner, T. (2016), Entwerfen und Gestalten im Maschinenbau : Bauteile - Baugruppen - Maschinen. 4, Fachbuchverlag Leipzig im Carl Hanser Verlag, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummelberger, D. (2018), “Hybride Werkstoffsysteme : Systematische Betrachtung und Bewertung der physikalischen Wirkmechanismen”.Google Scholar
Kaebernick, H., Kara, S. and Sun, M. (2003), “Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements”, in Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, pp. 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00056-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, B. (2009), “Leichtbau-Konstruktion”, Leichtbau-Konstruktion. Vieweg+Teubner. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9965-1Google Scholar
Kussmaul, R. et al. (2019), “Individualized lightweight structures for biomedical applications using additive manufacturing and carbon fiber patched composites”, Design Science, Vol. 5, p. e20. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachmayer, R. and Lippert, R.S. (2017), “Additive Manufacturing Quantifiziert”, Additive Manufacturing Quantifiziert. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54113-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallick, P.K. (2010), Materials, Design and Manufacturing for Lightweight Vehicles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, S., Hao, L. and Zhang, D. (2014), “Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation”, in International Journal of Production Economics, pp. 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nes, N. and Cramer, J. (2006), “Product lifetime optimization: a challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 15-16, pp. 1307–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öchsner, A. (2018), “Leichtbaukonzepte”, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden (essentials ). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20604-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G. et al. (2007), “Engineering design: A systematic approach”, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polacsek, T. et al. (2019), “Design for efficient production, a model-based approach”, in Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2019.8877088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponche, R. et al. (2012), “A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing: A method to obtain a design that meets specifications while optimizing a given additive manufacturing process is presented in this paper”, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2012.679499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, B., Hinz, H. and Roth, D. (2014), “Supporting Lightweight Design Potential Assessment in the Conceptual Phase”, in Proceedings of International Design Conference, Design, pp. 353–362. issn: 18479073.Google Scholar
Puri, W., Meerkamm, H. and Schmidt, W. (2001), “Strategies and rules for lightweight design”, Design Methods for Performance and Sustainability.Google Scholar
Raja, V. (2019), “On the Design of Functionally Integrated Aero-engine Structures Modeling and Evaluation Methods for Architecture and Complexity”.Google Scholar
Schilling, M.A. and Hill, C.W.L. (1998), “Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives”, IEEE Engineering Management Review. IEEE, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 55–68. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1998.1109051Google Scholar
Schumann, S. (2005), “The Paths and Strategies for Increased Magnesium Applications in Vehicles”. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.488-489.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seepersad, C.C. (2014), “Challenges and Opportunities in Design for Additive Manufacturing”, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2013.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tempelman, E. (2013), “Lightweight Materials, Lightweight Design?”, Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099359-1.00018-7Google Scholar
Tu, Y.L. and Xie, S.Q. (2003), Product development cost estimation and optimisation in a global manufacturing environment.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türk, D.-A. et al. (2019), “Design and manufacture of hybrid metal composite structures using functional tooling made by additive manufacturing”, Design Science. Cambridge University Press (CUP), p. 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.16Google Scholar
Türk, D.A. et al. (2018), “Design and manufacturing of high-performance prostheses with additive manufacturing and fiber-reinforced polymers”, Production Engineering. Springer Verlag, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0799-yGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (1995), Product Design and Development, Fifth Edition: About the Authors.Google Scholar
Wagner, C. (n.d.), Funktionsintegration im Rahmen einer fertigungsgetriebenen Produktentwicklung. Available at: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/id/eprint/7528 (Accessed: 9 November 2019).Google Scholar
Yang, S., Tang, Y. and Zhao, Y.F. (2015), “A new part consolidation method to embrace the design freedom of additive manufacturing”, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 20, pp. 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. (2007), “Technical Briefs Study on Structural Lightweight Design of Automotive Front Side Rail Based on Response Surface Method”. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2712223CrossRefGoogle Scholar