Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T06:41:00.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTEXT-SPECIFIC AGILE PROCESS DESIGN TO SUPPORT THE PLANNING OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Part of: Design Organisation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Baschin ,
T. Huth  and
T. Vietor
J. Baschin*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
T. Huth
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
T. Vietor
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
*
*j.baschin@tu-braunschweig.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Modern products are often developed in local distributed teams involving various engineering domains. As a result, product development processes are characterized by a high degree of complexity and individuality. However, the project context is often not integrated into the project planning, which can lead to uncertainties in the processes. In addition, reflection does not take place adequately in process execution. Therefore, this paper presents a concept for agile process design that enables reducing uncertainties based on context-specific reflections and adapting the processes.

Keywords

agile process engineeringreflectionprocess modellingprocess analysisprocess improvement

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 491 - 500
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, A. et al. (2019), “A systematic approach to situation-adequate mechatronic system development by ASD - Agile Systems Design”, Proceedings of the CIRP Design 2019/29th CIRP Design Conference, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal, May 8-10, 2019, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 1015–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baschin, J., Inkermann, D. and Vietor, T. (2019), “Agile Process Engineering to support Collaborative Design”, Proceedings of the CIRP Design 2019/29th CIRP Design Conference, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal, May 8-10, 2019, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 1035–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavendiek, A.-K. et al. (2018), “Collaborative Design: Linking methods, communication tools and competencies to processes”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018/15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21-24, 2018, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J., Kugeler, M. and Rosemann, M. (2012), Prozessmanagement - Ein Leitfaden zur prozessorientierten Organisationsgestaltung, Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446445819Google Scholar
Browning, T.R., Fricke, E. and Negele, H. (2006), “Key concepts in modeling product development processes”, Published online in Systems Engineering - The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering, February, 2006, Wiley Periodicals, pp. 104–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, C. and Gooch, S. (2004), Managing Engineering Design, Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollauer, C. and Lindemann, U. (2017), “Design Process Tailoring: A Review and Perspective on the Literature”, Proceedings of ICoRD 2017/6th International Conference on Research into Design, January 9-11, 2017, Guwahati, India, Springer, Cham, pp. 609–618.Google Scholar
Hüsselmann, C., Dönges, S. and Karpf, S. (2019), Zielgerichtete Adaption des Projektmanagements, Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Friedberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Huth, T., Inkermann, D. and Vietor, T. (2018), “Model-based Process Engineering - An approach to integrated product system and process modelling”, Paper presented at EMEASEC 2018/TdSE 2018, November 5-7, 2018, Berlin.Google Scholar
Inkermann, D. (2019), “Towards Model-based Process Engineering”, Proceedings of the ICED 2019/22nd International Conference on Engineering Design, Delft, August 5-8, 2019, Netherlands, The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3741–3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komus, et al. (2019), Status Quo (Scaled) Agile 2019/2020, Hochschule Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. (2009), Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte, Springer, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, U. (2016), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Hanser, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446445819Google Scholar
Lindemann, U. and Reichwald, R. (1998), Integriertes Änderungsmanagement, Springer, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meißner, M. et al. (2005), “Eine adaptive Produktentwicklungsmethodik als Beitrag zur Prozessgestaltung in der Produktentwicklung”, Proceedings of the Symposium “Design for X”/16th Symposium “Design for X”, October 13-14, 2005, Neukirchen, Germany, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
Negele, H., Fricke, E. and Igenbergs, E. (1997), “ZOPH - A Systematic Approach to the Modeling of Product”, Proceedings of the INCOSE 1997/7th International Symposium, August 3-7, 1997, Los Angeles, USA, Wiley Online Library, pp. 266–273.Google Scholar
Reymen, I.M.M.J. and Hammer, D.K. (2002), “Structured reflection for improving design processes”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2002/7th International Design Conference, May 14-17, 2002, Dubrovnik, Croatia, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 887–892.Google Scholar
Riesener, M. et al. (2019), “Methodology for the Design of Agile Product Development Networks”, Proceedings of the CIRP Design 2019/29th CIRP Design Conference, May 8-10, 2019, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 1029–1034.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1983), The reflective practitioner: How professionals thin in action, Maurice Temple Smith, London.Google Scholar
Seegrün, A. (2019), Reflective process engineering and method application in collaborative design, [Master Thesis], Technische Universität Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Snowden, D.J. and Boone, M.E. (2007), “A Leaders Framework for Decision Making”, Published in Harvard business review, December, 2007, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
Vietor, T., Hermann, C. and Spengler, T.S. (2015), Synergetische Produktentwicklung - Unternehmensübergreifend erfolgreich zusammenarbeiten. Ergebnisse des Verbundprojekts SynProd, Shaker, Aachen.Google Scholar
Weixelbaum, I. (2016), Mit Teamreflexion zum Teamerfolg - Analyse, Modellierung und gezielte Förderung kollektiver Reflexionsprozesse. University of Bamberg Press, Bamberg.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, M., Dühr, K. and Albers, A. (2019), “A context-model for adapting design processes and methods”, Proceedings of the CIRP Design 2019/29th CIRP Design Conference, May 8-10, 2019, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2017), “Process Models in design and development”, Published in Research in Engineering Design, Volume 29, July, 2017, Springer, pp. 161–202.Google Scholar