No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Robert E. Dalton
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Information
- Type
- Judicial Enforcement of Treaties: Self-Execution and Related Doctrines
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006
References
1 Vazquez, Carlos Manuel, The Four Doctrines of Self-Executing Treaties, 89 AJIL 695, 722-23 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 265 U.S. 332 (1924).
3 The 1999 Convention is the latest of a series of such treaties beginning with the Warsaw Convention of 1929. Cases under that convention and its progeny have substantially contributed to the development of the rules of treaty interpretation by U.S. courts.
4 580 F.2d 1055 (D.C. Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 436 U.S. 907 (1978).
5 33 UST 39, TIAS 10030.
6 Coplin v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 115, 123, rev’d, 761 F.2d 688 (Fed. Cir. 1985), aff’d, 479 U.S. 27 (1986).
7 Breard v. Greene, 523 U.S. 371 (1998).
8 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 103 (1801).
9 229 U.S. 447, 463 (1913).
10 J. N. Rodgers, International Law and United States Law 90 (1999).
11 T.I.A.S. 11098, 2120 UNTS 109.
12 S. Exec. Rep. 99-27, 3 (1986).
13 Id.