Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T03:13:35.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Joost Pauwelyn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Joost Pauwelyn
Joost Pauwelyn*
Affiliation:
Duke Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 98 , 2004 , pp. 135 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 See particularly Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law 478-86 (2003)Google Scholar, where I also explain why cases like EC-Hormones and EC—Poultry do not contradict my position, contrary to what Professor Trachtman contends.

2 The Mox Plant case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Judgment, ITLOS, Case No. 10 (Oct. 3, 2001).