Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-x9fsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-26T23:52:17.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer Program for Analysing Interstratified Structures by Fourier Transform Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

E. Vila  and
A. Ruiz-Amil
E. Vila
Affiliation:
Institute de Química Inorgánica “Elhuyar”, C.S.I.C., c/Serrano 113, 28006-Madrid, Spain.
A. Ruiz-Amil
Affiliation:
Institute de Química Inorgánica “Elhuyar”, C.S.I.C., c/Serrano 113, 28006-Madrid, Spain.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A computer program for analysing two-component interstratified structures by two different Fourier transform methods is described. The first method consists of the calculation of the X-ray diffraction intensity function, and in the second one (direct method) the distribution function of interlayer distances is calculated. The programs have been written in compiled GWBASIC for an Olivetti M-24 microcomputer (MS-DOS operating system), and they may also be run on any IBM compatible personal computer. As an example, this program is applied for the analysis of a chlorite-smectite interstratified mineral.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 7 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, L.T., Hendricks, S.B. & Nelson, R.A. (1939). Soil Sci. 48, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, J.W. (1934). Am. Mineral. 19, 557–575.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S.B. & Teller, E. (1942). J. Chem. Phys. 10, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (1974). Vol. IV. Birmingham: Kynoch Press.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. (1953). Nature (London) 171, 616.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. (1956). Koll-ZS 149, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. (1958). Koll-ZS 156, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. & Ruiz-Amil, A. (1959). Koll-ZS 162, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C. & Ruiz-Amil, A., (1975) Soil Compon., ed. Gieseking, J.E., 2, 265–334. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D.M.C., Ruiz-Amil, A. & Brown, G. (1961). X-ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay minerals, ed. Brown, G., 393–445. London: Mineralogical Society.Google Scholar
Méring, J. (1949), Acta Crystallogr. 2, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méring, J. (1950), Trans. Int. Congr. Soil Sci., Amsterdam, 4th, 4, 21–26.Google Scholar
Nagelschmidt, G. (1944). Mineral. Mag. 27, 59–61.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. (1967). Am. Mineral. 52, 661–672.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. (1980). Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification, ed. Brindley, G.W. & Brown, G., 249–302. London: Mineralogical Society.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Amil, A., Vila, E. & Aragón de la Cruz, F. (1987). In preparation.Google Scholar