Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T07:24:24.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

All of the Birds Are Laughing: An Ecofeminist Interpretation of Female Pastoral in Kate Bush’s A Sky of Honey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2025

Jenny Ann Cubin*
Affiliation:
Independent scholar based in Cumbria, UK

Abstract

This article offers an ecofeminist interpretation of female pastoral expression in Kate Bush’s song cycle A Sky of Honey (2005). By identifying points of overlap between the re-visionary strategies of female pastoral and the ecofeminist ethics of care, I examine how A Sky of Honey’s sound world interrogates and restructures the primacy of dualist thinking common in pastoral convention. Exploring the creative background of A Sky of Honey, including the accompanying artwork, I first establish points of convergence with and divergence from pastoral tradition. I then analyse musical motifs to trace the development of character voices, before considering how the interactions of human voice and birdsong articulate a pastoral space that dissolves dualist structures in favour of collaboration. Reflecting on how this space demonstrates an ecofeminist ethics of care, I frame A Sky of Honey as an expression of female pastoral that reconfigures pastoral mythologies to envision an alternate vision of empathy and relationality.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, C.J., and Gruen, L. (eds.) 2022a. Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth, 2nd edition (New York, Bloomsbury Academic)Google Scholar
Adams, C.J., and Gruen, L. 2022b. ‘Ecofeminist footings’, in Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth, 2nd edition, ed. Adams, C.J. and Gruen, L. (New York, Bloomsbury Academic), pp. 143Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a Feminist Life (Durham and London, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Alpers, P. 1996. What Is Pastoral? (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)10.7208/chicago/9780226015231.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J., Elliott, R, and Longstaff, G. 2023. ‘“Standing in your cardigan”: evocative objects, ordinary intensities, and queer sociality in the Swiftian pop song’, in Disrupted Knowledge: Scholarship in a Time of Change, ed. Sikka, T., Longstaff, G. and Walls, S. (Leiden, The Netherlands, Brill), pp. 259–79. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004536418_015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, D. 2023. ‘Natureculture, lifedeath’, in Staying Together: NatureCulture in a Changing World, ed. Mondal, K. (Lanham, Lexington Books), pp. 3140Google Scholar
Bush, K. 1980. ‘Them Bats and Doves’, Kate Bush Club Newsletter, September. http://gaffa.org/garden/kate8.html (accessed 11 March 2024)Google Scholar
Bush, K. 2005. Aerial (London, Faber Music)Google Scholar
Bush, K. 2018. How to Be Invisible (London, Faber and Faber)Google Scholar
Caldecott, L., and Leland, S. (eds.) 1983. Reclaim the Earth: Women Speak Out for Life on Earth (London, The Women’s Press)Google Scholar
Casselot, M. 2016. ‘Ecofeminist Echoes in New Materialism?’, PhænEx, 11/1, pp. 7396. https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v11i1.4394Google Scholar
Cichocki, P., and Kilarksi, M. 2010. ‘On “Eskimo words for snow”: the life cycle of a linguistic misconception’, Historiographia Linguistica, 373, pp. 341–7710.1075/hl.37.3.03cicCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corman, L. 2016. ‘The ventriloquist’s burden: animal advocacy and the problem of speaking for others’, in Animal Subjects 2.0, ed. Castricano, J. and Corman, L. (Canada, Wilfrid Laurier University Press), pp. 47351210.51644/9781771122115-020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, J. 2022. ‘Caring to dialogue: feminism and the treatment of animals’, in Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth, 2nd edition, ed. Adams, C.J. and Gruen, L. (New York, Bloomsbury Academic), pp. 4767Google Scholar
Donovan, J., and Adams, C.J. (eds.) 2007. The Feminist Care in Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader (New York, Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Dorais, L. 2014. The Language of the Inuit: Syntax, Semantic, and Society in the Arctic (Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
Dorais, L. 2020. Words of the Inuit: A Semantic Stroll through a Northern Culture (Winnipeg, MB, University of Manitoba Press)10.1515/9780887558641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, J., and Bush, K. 2014. ‘A demon in the drift: Kate Bush interviewed’, The Quietus, 21 March. https://thequietus.com/interviews/kate-bush-interview-2/ (accessed 21 November 2024)Google Scholar
Doyle, T. 2022. 50 Visions of Kate Bush (London, Nine Eight Books)Google Scholar
Edwards, M., and Olson, R. 2000. ‘Indus civilization’, National Geographic, June, p. 108Google Scholar
Feisst, S. 2016. ‘Negotiating nature and music through technology: ecological reflections in the works of Maggi Payne and Laurie Speigel’, in Current Directions in Ecomusicology: Music, Culture, Nature, ed. Allen, A.S. and Dawe, K. (New York, Routledge), pp. 245–57Google Scholar
Fraiman, S. 2022. ‘Pussy panic versus like animals: tracking gender in animal studies’, in Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other animals and the Earth, 2nd edition, eds. Adams, C.J. and Gruen, L. (New York, Bloomsbury Academic), pp. 283312Google Scholar
Gaard, G. (ed.) 1993. Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature (Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press)Google Scholar
Gaard, G. 2010. ‘New directions for ecofeminism: toward a more feminist ecocriticism’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 17/4, pp. 643–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isq108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaard, G. 2011. ‘Ecofeminism revisited: rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism’, Feminist Formations, 23/2, pp. 2653. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2011.0017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaard, G. 2017. Critical Ecofeminism (London, Lexington Books)Google Scholar
Gaard, G. 2019. ‘Posthumanism, ecofeminism, and inter-species relations’, in Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment, ed. MacGregor, S. (New York and London, Routledge), pp. 115–29Google Scholar
Gardner, A. 2017. ‘PJ Harvey and remembering England’, in Mad Dogs and Englishness: Popular Music and English Identities, ed. Brooks, L., Donnelly, M., and Mills, R. (New York, Bloomsbury Academic), pp. 668210.5040/9781501311284.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrard, G. 2004. Ecocriticism (London, Routledge)10.4324/9780203644843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, T. 1999. Pastoral (London, Routledge)10.4324/9780203003961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, L. 2021. Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals (New York, Lantern Publishing & Media)Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2004. The Haraway Reader (New York and London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Harper, A.B. (ed.) 2010. Sistah Vegan: Black Female Vegans Speak on Food, Identity, Health, and Society (New York, Lantern Books)Google Scholar
Harrison, E.J. 1991. Female Pastoral: Women Writers Re-Visioning the American South (Knoxville, TN, The University of Tennessee Press)Google Scholar
Hassler-Forest, D. 2017. ‘The politics of world building: heteroglossia in Janelle Monáe’s Afrofuturist WondaLand’, in World Building. Transmedia, Fans, Industries, ed. Boni, M. (Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam Press), pp. 377–92Google Scholar
Kemmerer, L. (ed.) 2011. Sister Species: Women, Animals and Social Justice (Chicago, IL, University of Illinois Press)Google Scholar
King, R. 2019. The Lark Ascending: The Music of the British Landscape (London, Faber and Faber)Google Scholar
Kings, A.E. 2017. ‘Intersectionality and the changing face of ecofeminism’, Ethics and the Environment, 22/1, pp. 6387.10.2979/ethicsenviro.22.1.04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, A. 1975. The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience and History in American Life and Letters (Chapel Hill, NC, The University of North Carolina Press)Google Scholar
Kolodny, A. 1984. The Land before Her: Fantasy and Experience of the American Frontiers, 1630–1860 (Chapel Hill, NC, The University of North Carolina Press)Google Scholar
Krupnik, I., and Müller-Wille, L. 2010. ‘Franz Boas and Inuktitut terminology for ice and snow: from the emergence of the field to the “Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax”’, in SIKU: Knowing Our Ice. Documenting Inuit Sea Ice Knowledge, ed. Krupnik, I., Aporta, C., Gearheard, S., Laidler, G., and Kielsen Holm, L. (Dordrecht, Springer), pp. 377400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8587-0_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, S. (ed.) 2019. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment (New York and London, Routledge)Google Scholar
MacGregor, S. 2022. ‘Making matter great again? Ecofeminism, new materialism and the everyday turn in environmental politics’, in Trajectories in Environmental Politics, ed. Hayes, G., Jinnah, S., Kashwan, P., Konisky, D.M., MacGregor, S., Meyer, J.M., and Zito, A.R. (London, Routledge), pp. 38.5710.4324/9781003213321-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallory, C. 2010. ‘What is ecofeminist political philosophy? Gender, nature and the political’, Environmental Ethics, 32/3, pp. 305–2210.5840/enviroethics201032333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, F. 2019. ‘The dilemma of dualism’, in Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment, ed. MacGregor, S. (London and New York, Routledge), pp. 5470Google Scholar
Merchant, C. 2005. Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
Merchant, C. 2016. Autonomous Nature: Problems of Prediction and Control from Ancient Times to the Scientific Revolution (London and New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Merchant, C. 2020. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, 40th Anniversary edition (New York, HarperOne)Google Scholar
Merrick, H. 2019. ‘Naturecultures and feminist materialism’, in Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment, ed. MacGregor, S. (London New York, Routledge), pp. 101–14Google Scholar
Moy, R. 2007. Kate Bush and Hounds of Love (Hampshire, Ashgate)Google Scholar
Mundy, R. 2018. Animal Musicalities: Birds, Beasts, and Evolutionary Listening (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Negus, K. 2012. ‘Narrative, interpretation, and the popular song’, The Musical Quarterly, 95/2–3, pp. 368–9510.1093/musqtl/gds021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, D. 2007. ‘Narrative theory as an analytical tool in the study of popular music texts’, Music & Letters, 88/2, pp. 29731510.1093/ml/gcm006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, L. 2002. She Bop II: The Definitive History of Women in Rock, Pop and Sound (London and New York, Continuum)Google Scholar
Phillips, M., and Rumens, N. (eds.) 2016. Contemporary Perspectives on Ecofeminism (London and New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature (London and New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. 2001. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason (London and New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. 2006. ‘The concept of a cultural landscape: nature, culture and agency in the land’, Ethics and the Environment, 11/2, pp. 115–5010.2979/ETE.2006.11.2.115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, V. 2009. ‘Nature in the active voice’, Australian Humanities Review, 46. https://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2009/05/01/nature-in-the-active-voice/ (accessed March 4, 2024)Google Scholar
Reynolds, S., and Press, J. 1995. The Sex Revolts: Gender, Rebellion and Rock ‘n’ Roll (London, Serpent’s Tail)Google Scholar
Rich, A. 1972. ‘When we dead awaken: writing as re-vision’, College English, 34/1, pp. 183010.58680/ce197218299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saylor, E. 2017. English Pastoral Music: From Arcadia to Utopia, 1900–1955 (Chicago, IL, University of Illinois Press)10.5406/illinois/9780252041099.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiva, V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India (London, Zed Books)Google Scholar
Stevens, L., Tait, P., and Varney, D. (eds.) 2018. Feminist Ecologies: Changing Environments in the Anthropocene (London, Palgrave Macmillan)10.1007/978-3-319-64385-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størvold, T. 2025. ‘Confronting Climate Change in Popular Music Texts: Nostalgia, Apocalypse, Utopia’, in The Intellect Handbook of Popular Music Methodologies, ed. Dines, M., Smith, G.D. and Rambarran, S. (London, Intellect), pp. 582–97.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. 2017. ‘Birdsong has inspired humans for centuries: is it music?’, The Conversation, July. https://theconversation.com/birdsong-has-inspired-humans-for-centuries-is-it-music-79000 (accessed 3 April 2024)Google Scholar
Taylor, H. 2020. ‘How musical are animals? Taking stock of zoömusicology’s prospects’, Music Research Annual: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Key Issues in Music Studies, 1, pp. 135Google Scholar
Thomson, G. 2015. Under the Ivy: The Life & Music of Kate Bush, 2nd edition (London, Omnibus Press)Google Scholar
Thrift, N. 2008. ‘Space: the fundamental stuff of geography’, in Key Concepts in Geography, 2nd edition, ed. Clifford, N.J., Holloway, S.L., Rice, S.P., and Valentine, G. (London, SAGE Publications), pp. 8596Google Scholar
Von Glahn, D. 2013. Music and the Skillful Listener: American Women Compose the Natural World (Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN, Indiana University Press)10.2979/5885.0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. 2016. The Country and the City (London, Penguin)Google Scholar
Withers, D.M. 2010. Adventures in Kate Bush and Theory (Bristol, HammerOn Press)Google Scholar
Wolfe, P. 2020. Women in the Studio: Creativity, Control and Gender in Popular Music Sound Production (New York, Routledge)Google Scholar
Young, R. 2010. Electric Eden: Unearthing Britain’s Visionary Music (London, Faber and Faber)Google Scholar