Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T13:25:41.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disgust and political attitudes

Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2020

Michael Bang Petersen ,
Joshua M. Tybur  and
Patrick A. Stewart
Michael Bang Petersen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
Joshua M. Tybur
Affiliation:
VU Amsterdam
Patrick A. Stewart*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Fayetteville
*
Correspondence: Patrick A. Stewart, Department of Political Science, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, 428 Old Main, Fayetteville, AR, 72701-4002. Email: pastewar@uark.edu
Get access

Abstract

We introduce the Politics and the Life Sciences Special Issue on Disgust and Political Attitudes discussing the importance of understanding state and trait disgust, the innovative and transparent process by which registered reports and preregistered studies were chosen and funded, and the manuscripts that make up this special issue. This essay concludes by discussing future research directions in disgust and political attitudes, as well as the benefits of a transparent review process that avoids the “file drawer problem” of unpublished null findings.

Keywords

pre-analysis plans (PAP)preregistrationregistered report (RR)in principle acceptance (IPA)

Information

Type
Perspective
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue: Disgust and Political Attitudes , Fall 2020 , pp. 129 - 134
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). The behavioral immune system shapes partisan preferences in modern democracies: Disgust sensitivity predicts voting for socially conservative parties. Political Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, T. G., Stewart, P. A., & Blanchar, J. C. (2014). Disgust and the politics of sex: Exposure to a disgusting odorant increases politically conservative views on sex and decreases support for gay marriage. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e95572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 1-9.10.1038/s41562-020-0823-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Homan, M. D. (2020). Yikes! Are we disgusted by politicians? Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 135–153.Google Scholar
Billingsley, J., Lieberman, D., & Tybur, J. M. (2018). Sexual disgust trumps pathogen disgust in predicting voter behavior during the 2016 US Presidential Election. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(2), 1474704918764170.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2020). The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 336–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifford, S., & Piston, S. (2017). Explaining public support for counterproductive homelessness policy: The role of disgust. Political Behavior, 39(2), 503–525.10.1007/s11109-016-9366-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Duncan, L. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halstead, I., Lewis, G. J. (2020). Understanding opposition to human gene editing: A role for pathogen disgust sensitivity? Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 154–166.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9(3), 435–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karinen, A. K., Molho, C., Kupfer, T. R., & Tybur, J. M. (2019). Disgust sensitivity and opposition to immigration: Does contact avoidance or resistance to foreign norms explain the relationship? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103817.10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ksiazkiewicz, A., Friesen, A. (2020). Slimy worms or sticky kids: How caregiving tasks and gender identity attenuate disgust response. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 167–186.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Dukes, A., & Weeden, J. (2010). Sex, drugs and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277(1699), 3501–3508.Google ScholarPubMed
MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Güler, E., Balliet, D., & Hofmann, W. (2017). Disgust and anger relate to different aggressive responses to moral violations. Psychological Science, 28(5), 609–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. M. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D., Laustsen, L., Smith, K., & Petersen, M. B. (in press). The psychophysiology of political ideology: Replications, reanalysis and recommendations. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Parsons, S., Kruijt, A. W., & Fox, E. (2019). Psychological science needs a standard practice of reporting the reliability of cognitive-behavioral measurements. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 378–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, N. J., Oosterhoff, B. (2020). Testing the effects of pathogen threat and sexual strategies on political ideology. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 187–199.Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLOS ONE, 6(10), e25552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinkopf, L. (2017). Disgust, empathy, and care of the sick: an evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 149–158.10.1007/s40806-016-0078-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, P. A., Adams, T. G. Jr., & Senior, C. (2020). The effect of trait and state disgust on fear of god and sin. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 51.Google ScholarPubMed
Terrizzi, J. A. Jr., Shook, N. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrizzi, J. A. Jr., Shook, N. J., & Ventis, W. L. (2010). Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 587–592.10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Çınar, Ç., Karinen, A. K., & Perone, P. (2018). Why do people vary in disgust? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1751), 20170204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., Barclay, P., Barlow, F. K., De Barra, M., … & Consedine, N. S. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(44), 12408–12413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Güler, E., & Molho, C. (2015). Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies? Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(6), 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tybur, J. M., Wesseldijk, L. W., & Jern, P. (2020). Genetic and environmental influences on disgust proneness, contamination sensitivity, and their covariance. Clinical Psychological Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620951510.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, F. & Petersen, M. B. (2018). The behavioral immune system is designed to avoid infected individuals, not outgroups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanaman, M. E., Chapman, H. A. (2020). Disgust and disgust-driven moral concerns predict support for restrictions on transgender bathroom access. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 200–214.Google Scholar
Wisneski, D. C., Hanson, B. E., Morgan, G. S. (2020). The roles of disgust and harm perception in political attitude moralization. Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 215–227.Google Scholar