Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T05:34:51.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communities ready for takeoff

Integrating social assets for biofuel site-selection modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Sanne A. M. Rijkhoff ,
Season A. Hoard ,
Michael J. Gaffney  and
Paul M. Smith
Sanne A. M. Rijkhoff*
Affiliation:
Mark O. Hatfield School of Government, Department of Political Science, Portland State University
Season A. Hoard
Affiliation:
School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs & Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University
Michael J. Gaffney
Affiliation:
Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University
Paul M. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Pennsylvania State University
*
Correspondence: Sanne A. M. Rijkhoff, Mark O. Hatfield School of Government, Department of Political Science, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland OR, 97207-0751. Email: sannerijkhoff@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Although much of the social science literature supports the importance of community assets for success in many policy areas, these assets are often overlooked when selecting communities for new infrastructure facilities. Extensive collaboration is crucial for the success of environmental and economic projects, yet it often is not adequately addressed when making siting decisions for new projects. This article develops a social asset framework that includes social, creative, and human capital to inform site-selection decisions. This framework is applied to the Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance project to assess community suitability for biofuel-related developments. This framework is the first to take all necessary community assets into account, providing insight into successful site selection beyond current models. The framework not only serves as a model for future biorefinery projects but also guides tasks that depend on informed location selection for success.

Keywords

Social asset frameworkcommunity capitalsocial capitalsite selectionbio-fuel facilities

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , Spring 2017 , pp. 14 - 26
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Klein v. U.S. Department of Energy, 753 F.3d 576 (2014).Google Scholar
McGlashen, Andy, “As key partners depart, future dims for Michigan cellulosic biofuel plant,” Midwest Energey News , 2013, August 6.Google Scholar
Reid, Andy, “Neighborhoods fighting plans for biofuel plant west of Delray Beach,” Sun Sentinel Times , 2010, September 2.Google Scholar
Stewart, Lance and Lambert, Dayton M., “Spatial heterogeneity of factors determining ethanol production site-selection in the U.S., 2000–2007,” Biomass and Bioenergy , 2010, 35(3): 1273–1285.Google Scholar
Zhang, Fengli, Johnson, Dana M., and Sutherland, John W., “A GIS-based method for identifying the optimal location for a facility to convert forest biomass to biofuel,” Biomass and Bioenergy , 2011, 35(9): 3951–3961.Google Scholar
Tigges, Leann M. and Noble, Molly, “Getting to yes or bailing on no: The site-selection process of ethanol plants in Wisconsin,” Rural Sociology , 2012, 77(4): 547–568.Google Scholar
Portney, Kent E. and Perry, Jeffrey M., “Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in U.S. cities,” Urban Affairs Review , 2010, 46(1): 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Evonne and Buys, Laurie, “The impact of social capital on residential water-affecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community,” Society & Natural Resources , 2008, 21(3): 244–257.Google Scholar
Parisi, Domenico, Taquino, Michael, Grice, Steven Michael, and Gill, Duana A., “Civic responsibility and the environment: Linking local conditions to community environmental activeness,” Society & Natural Resources , 2010, 17(2): 97–112.Google Scholar
Emery, Mary and Flora, Cornelia, “Spiraling up: Mapping community transformation with the Community Capitals Framework,” Journal of Community Development Society , 2006, 37(1): 19–35.Google Scholar
Emery and Flora, 2006.Google Scholar
Reid, 2010.Google Scholar
Emery and Flora, 2006, p. 22.Google Scholar
For detailed examples of built, financial, and natural capital in site-selection research, see Natalie Martinkus, Wenping Shi, Nicholas Lovrich Jr., John Pierce, Paul Smith, and Michael Wolcott, “Integrating bio-geophysical and social assets into biomass-to-biofuel supply chain site decisions,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014, 66: 410–418.Google Scholar
See also, Martinkus, Natalie, Rijkhoff, Sanne A. M., Hoard, Season A., Shi, Wenping, Smith, Paul, Gaffney, Michael, and Wolcott, Michael, “Biorefinery site selection using a stepwise biogeophysical and social analysis approach,” Biomass and Bioenergy , 2017, 97: 139–148.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Coleman, James S., “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology , 1988, 94: S95–S120.Google Scholar
Montgomery, John D. and Inkeles, Alex, Social Capital as a Policy Resource (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science and Business B.V., 2001).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital, an interview with the author,” Journal of Democracy , 1995, 6(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Anil, Goetz, Stephan J., and Freshwater, David, “The production of social capital in US counties,” Journal of Socio-Economics , 2006, 35: 83–101.Google Scholar
Erp, Michael, Gaffney, Michael, Goldman, John, Gray, Kelsey, and Lovrich, Nicholas, WRICOPS — A Decade of Service, 1997–2007: A Brief History, Major Accomplishments, Principal Activities and Prospects for the Future (Pullman: Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University, 2009).Google Scholar
Lovrich, Nicholas P., Gaffney, Michael J., Weber, Edward P., Bireley, R. Michael, Matthews, Dayna R., and Bjork, Bruce, “Inter-agency collaborative approaches to Endangered Species Act compliance and salmon recovery in the Pacific Northwest,” International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behavior , 2005, 8(2): 237–273.Google Scholar
Grott, Catherine, Health Care Reform at the State Level: The Dynamics of Achieving Service Integration at the Local Health Department Level in Montana (Pullman: Washington State University, 1999).Google Scholar
Portney and Perry, 2010.Google Scholar
Miller and Buys, 2008.Google Scholar
Parisi et al., 2010.Google Scholar
Flora, Cornelia B., “Social capital and sustainability: Agriculture and communities in the great plains of the Corn Belt,” Research in Rural Sociology and Development: A Research Annual , 1995, 6: 227–246.Google Scholar
Cramb, Rob A., “Social capital and soil conservation: Evidence from the Philippines,” Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics , 2005, 49(2): 211–226.Google Scholar
Briceno, Tania and Stagl, Sigrid, “the role of social processes for sustainable consumption,” Journal of Cleaner Production , 2006, 14(17): 1541–1551.Google Scholar
Jones, Nikoleta, Sophoulis, Costas M., Iosifides, Theodoros, Botetzagias, Iosif, and Evangelinos, Konstantinos, “The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments,” Environmental Politics , 2009, 18(4): 595–611.Google Scholar
Jones et al., 2009.Google Scholar
Putnam, 1993.Google Scholar
Coleman, 1988.Google Scholar
Montgomery and Inkeles, 2001.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, “The forms of capital,” Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Richardson, John G., ed. (New York: Greenwood Press, 1986), pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
Coleman, 1988.Google Scholar
Montgomery and Inkeles, 2001.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.Google Scholar
Putnam, 1993.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.Google Scholar
Coleman, 1988.Google Scholar
Putnam, 1995.Google Scholar
Montgomery and Inkeles, 2001.Google Scholar
Budd, William and Lovrich, Nicholas Jr., “Cultural sources of variations in US urban sustainability attributes,” Cities , 2008, 25(5): 257–267.Google Scholar
Emery and Flora, 2006.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard, The Rise of the Creative Class (New York: Basic Books, 2002), p. 273.Google Scholar
Florida, 2002.Google Scholar
Florida, 2002.Google Scholar
Budd and Lovrich, 2008.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2014.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2017.Google Scholar
Emery and Flora, 2006.Google Scholar
Pretty, Jules and Ward, Hugh, “Social capital and the environment,” World Development , 2001, 29(2): 209–227.Google Scholar
Pretty and Ward, 2001, p. 209.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2014.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2017.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2014.Google Scholar
Although the datasets are publicly available, we can provide the county scores for all counties within the United States upon request.Google Scholar
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. 2013. “County Health Rankings National Data.” http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/ (accessed April 5, 2014).Google Scholar
Western States Arts Federation. 2010. “The Creative Vitality™ Index: An Overview.” http://www.westaf.org/publications_and_research/cvi (accessed April 5, 2014).Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.Google Scholar
Unfortunately, updated scores for CVI and social capital were not available at the time this manuscript was completed. In order to keep comparisons possible, we decided not to divert too much with the health data.Google Scholar
For a more detailed discussion of the remaining types of capital (natural and built), see Martinkus et al., 2014.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.Google Scholar
A table with all calculated benchmarks for all census regions can be found in the online appendix.Google Scholar
Grott, 1999.Google Scholar
Lovrich et al., 2005.Google Scholar
The tables with all the raw scores of the counties can be found in the online appendix.Google Scholar
Lovrich et al., 2005.Google Scholar
Grott, 1999.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2014.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2017.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2014.Google Scholar
Martinkus et al., 2017.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rijkhoff et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Rijkhoff et al. supplementary material(File)
File 62.1 KB