Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-25T17:50:27.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gendered Debate: Do Men and Women Communicate Differently in the House of Commons?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2020

Lotte Hargrave Open the ORCID record for Lotte Hargrave [Opens in a new window]  and
Tone Langengen
Lotte Hargrave
Affiliation:
University College London
Tone Langengen
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has long been claimed in the gender and politics literature that male and female legislators have different communication styles. The evidence for this claim has come mostly from interviews with legislators as the key informants on gendered differences. We contribute to this literature in two ways: First, we empirically examine speeches by Members of Parliament to establish whether gendered differences are observable in parliamentary debates. Second, we advance existing measurement approaches by testing for multiple dimensions of communication style, providing a more systematic approach to studying gendered speech behavior. Communication style is examined through a content analysis of almost 200 speeches in three parliamentary sessions of the British House of Commons. We find compelling evidence for differences in communication style: women evidence arguments with personal experience, discuss policies in a concrete way, and are less adversarial than men. Our findings have important implications for how political communication styles might improve public engagement with politicians, offer a different focus to the discussion, and improve democratic legitimacy.

Keywords

genderpolitical communicationlegislative studiesparliamentary behaviorrepresentationpolitical behavior

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 580 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We thank Jack Blumenau, Jennifer Hudson, Rune Karlsen, Rebecca McKee, Meg Russell, Orlanda Siow, and Katerina Tertytchnaya for helpful conversations and insightful comments on, in some cases, numerous drafts of this article. We also thank attendees of two useful working group seminars held at University College London for their thoughtful comments and feedback, as well as the editors and three anonymous reviewers of Politics & Gender for their constructive comments.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Kristin J., and Leaper, Campbell. 1998. “Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How.” Sex Roles 39 (4): 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Müller, Jochen. 2014. “Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-Making in the Swedish Riksdag.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (3): 504–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behaviour: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2005. “Gendering Parliamentary Questions.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (1): 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Diane D., and Stanley, Jeanie R.. 1991. “Personal Relationships and Legislative Power: Male and Female Perceptions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4): 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, Jane, and Robson, Deborah C.. 1995. “A ‘Feminine Style’ in Women's Political Discourse: An Exploratory Essay.” Communication Quarterly 43 (3): 353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenau, Jack. 2019. “The Effects of Female Leadership on Women's Voice in Political Debate.” British Journal of Political Science. Published online September 25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000334.Google Scholar
Blumenau, Jack, and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2020. “Measuring the Persuasive Power of Political Arguments.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Bochel, Catherine, and Briggs, Jacqui. 2000. “Do Women Make A Difference?” Politics 20 (2): 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, Sharon, and Palmieri, Sonia. 1999. “Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, Ana. 2009. “Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004a. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004b. New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2016. The Good Parliament. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Webb, Paul. 2012. Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2017. Has Democracy Failed Women? London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Bryce J., Hayes, Matthew, and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2019. “Pitch Perfect: Vocal Pitch and the Emotional Intensity of Congressional Speech.” American Political Science Review 113 (4): 941–62.Google Scholar
Dow, Bonnie J., and Tonn, Mari Boor. 1993. “‘Feminine Style’ and Political Judgment in the Rhetoric of Ann Richards.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (3): 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Lawrence, Regina G., Rose, Melody, and Weber, Christopher R.. 2013. “Traits versus Issues: How Female Candidates Shape Coverage of Senate and Gubernatorial Races.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3): 715–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freiberg, Arie, and Carson, W. G.. 2010. “The Limits to Evidence-Based Policy: Evidence, Emotion and Criminal Justice.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 69 (2): 152–64.Google Scholar
Gomard, Kirsten, and Krogstad, Anne. 2001. Instead of the Ideal Debate: Doing Politics and Doing Gender in Nordic Political Campaign Discourse. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, Annette, and Murachver, Tamar. 2007. “Gender Preferential Responses to Speech.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (3): 274–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society, Hansard. 2014. Tuned In or Turned Off? Public Attitudes to Prime Minister's Questions. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar
Institute for Government. 2018. Parliamentary Monitor 2018. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/parliamentary-monitor-2018 (accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2020. “Women in National Parliaments.” http://archive.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm (accessed March 8, 2020).Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Karvonen, Lauri, Djupsund, Göran, and Carlson, Tom. 1995. “Political Language.” In Women in Nordic Politics: Closing the Gap, eds. Karvonen, L and Selle, P. Farnham: Ashgate, 343–82.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona. 2011. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and O'Brien, Diana Z.. 2012. “All the President's Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., Theriault, Sean M., and Guthrie, Samantha. 2018. “Nice Girls? Sex, Collegiality, and Bipartisan Cooperation in the US Congress.” Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1268–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, Laura R. Winsky. 1998. “Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse.” Journal of Politics 60 (2): 440–61.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Goedert, Nicholas. 2013. “Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women's Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Suzanne. 1997. “Welcome to ‘Blair's Babes’ but the Struggle Goes On.” The Independent, May 9. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/welcome-to-blairs-babes-but-the-struggle-goes-on-1260491.html (accessed March 17, 2020).Google Scholar
Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2011. “Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates.” Parliamentary Affairs 64 (3): 448–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Russell, Meg, and Gover, Daniel. 2017. Legislation at Westminster: Parliamentary Actors and Influence in the Making of British Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse & Society 11 (3): 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sones, Boni, Moran, Margaret, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Women in Parliament: The New Suffragettes. London: Politico's.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelander, Kerstin. 1986. Politikersprak i Konsperspektiv [Language of politicians, male and female]. Malmo: Liber Forlag.Google Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue. 2001. “Do Women Leaders Make a Difference? Substance, Style, and Perceptions.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 149–65.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Don D. 1997. “Ruling with the Heart: Emotion-Based Public Policy.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6: 55–88.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don H.. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hargrave and Langengen supplementary material

Appendices A-C

Download Hargrave and Langengen supplementary material(File)
File 36.7 KB