Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T03:14:12.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heroic age geology in Victoria Land, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Robert J. Tingey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the heroic age of Antarctic exploration—the first 15 or so years of this century (Hayes 1932)—scientific investigations took second place, at least in the public eye, to geographical exploration and its offshoot, the race to the South Pole. Nevertheless important geological discoveries were made and the basic framework of Antarctic geology was mapped out. This article describes briefly the geological work and the geologists of the expeditions that explored Victoria Land between 1900 and 1912, with a note on the significance of the geological specimens found with the bodies of Scott, Wilson and Bowers in 1912.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 21 , Issue 134 , May 1983 , pp. 451 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arber, E. A. 1907. Report on the plant-remains from the Beacon Sandstone. In: Ferrar, H. T. Report on the field geology of the region explored during the ‘Discovery’ Antarctic Expedition, 1901—04. National Antarctic Expedition 1901–04, Natural History, I, Geology (Field geology: petrography) London, British Museum.Google Scholar
Bayly, P. G. W. and Stillwell, F. L. 1923. The Adélie Land meteorite. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–14, Scientific Reports, Series A, 4 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Benson, W. N.and others. 1916. Contributions to the palaeontology and petrology of south Victoria Land. British Antarctic Expedition 1907–09. Reports on the scientific investigations, Geology, II, London, William Heinemann.Google Scholar
British Museum 1964. British Antarctic (‘Terra Nova’) Expedition, 1910, Natural History Reports, Geology. London. British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
, C.R.M. 1913. Review of Scon's Last Expedition arranged by Leonard Huxley. Geographical Journal, 43: 16–18.Google Scholar
David, T. W. E., Smeeth, W. F., and Schofield, J. A. 1895. Notes on Antarctic rocks collected by MrBorchgrevink, C. E.. The Royal Society of New South Wales Journal, 29: 1–32.Google Scholar
David, T. W. E. and Priestley, R. E. 1914. Glaciology, physiography, stratigraphy and tectonic geology of South Victoria Land (with short notes on palaeontology by Taylor, T. Griffith and ProfessorGoddard, E. J.). British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–09, Reports on the scientific investigations, Geology, I. London, William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Du Toit, A. L. 1937. Our wandering continents. Edinburgh, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. N. 1928. The occurrence of Glossopteris in the Beacon Sandstone of Ferrar Glacier, South Victoria Land. Geological Magazine, 65: 323–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. R. G. R. 1914. South with Scott. London, Collins.Google Scholar
Ferrar, H. T. 1907. Report on the field geology of the region explored during the ‘Discovery’ Antarctic Expedition, 1901–04. National Antarctic Expedition 1901–04, Natural History, I, Geology (Field geology: petrography). London, British Museum.Google Scholar
Ferrar, H. T. 1914. Note on the Geology of the Antarctic Regions. Cairo Scientific Journal, 91 (3): 76–82.Google Scholar
Garwood, E.J. and Gregory, J. W. 1898. Contributions to the glacial geology of Spitsbergen. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal, 54: 197–225.Google Scholar
Gould, L. M. 1935. Structure of the Queen Maud Mountains, Antarctica. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 46: 973–84.Google Scholar
Gregory, C. J. 1977. J. W. Gregory, scientist, explorer, teacher—a sketch. Chelmsford, UK, Simmons.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1901a. The work of the National Antarctic Expedition. Nature, 63 (1643): 609–12.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1901b. The National Antarctic Expedition. Nature, 64 (1651): 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1906. The work of the National Antarctic Expedition. Nature, 73 (1891): 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. G. 1928. Antarctica. London, The Richards Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. G. 1932. The conquest of the South Pole—Antarctic exploration, I906–1931. London, Thornton Butterworth.Google Scholar
Huntford, R. 1979. Scott and Amundsen. London, Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Huxley, L. E. 1914. Scott's last expedition. London, Smith, Elder.Google Scholar
Mawson, D. 1915. The home of the blizzard. London, Heinemann.Google Scholar
Mill, H. R. 1930. The record of the Royal Geographical Society, 1830–1930. London, Royal Geographical Society.Google Scholar
Nature. 1901a. The National Antarctic Expedition. Nature, 64 (1646): 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nature. 1901b. The Antarctic expedition. Nature, 64 (1649): 131–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nature. 1903. The British Antarctic Expedition. Nature, 67 (1744): 516–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, R. E. 1916. Antarctic adventure—Scott's northern party. London, Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Priestley, R. E. 1923. Physiography (Robertson Bay and Terra Nova Bay regions). British (Terra Nova) Antarctic Expedition, 1910–13. London, Harrison and Sons.Google Scholar
Prior, G. T. 1898. Petrographical notes on the rock specimens collected in the Antarctic regions during the voyage of H.M.S. Erebus and Terror under Sir James Clark Ross in 1839–43. Mineralogical Magazine, 12 (55): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, G. T. 1902. Report on the rock-specimens collected by the Southern Cross Antarctic Expedition. In: Lankester, E. Ray, and BELL, Jeffrey, eds. Report on the collections of natural history made in the Antarctic regions during the voyage of the ‘Southern Cross’. London, The British Museum (Natural History): 321–32.Google Scholar
Schetelig, J. 1912. Provisional remarks on the examination of the geological specimens brought by Roald Amundsen's South Polar expedition from the Antarctic continent (South Victoria Land and King Edward VII Land). Appendix III. In: Amundsen, R.The South Pole, 2: 395–98.Google Scholar
Scott, R. F. 1905. The voyage of the Discovery, London, Smith Elder.Google Scholar
Scott, R. F. 1910. Plans of the British Antarctic Expedition. Geographical Journal, 36: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C. 1914. Antarctic fossil plants. British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition, 1910, Natural history report, geology, 1 (1): 1–49. London, British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Shackleton, , Sir E. H. 1910. The heart of the Antarctic, London, William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 1933. Hartley Travers Ferrar. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal, 89: lxxxix–xci.Google Scholar
Stillwell, F. L. 1918. The metamorphic rocks of Adélie Land. Section 1. Australasian Antarctic Expedition, 1911–1914. Scientific Reports. Series A, 3 (1).Google Scholar
Taylor, T. G. 1916. With Scott—the silver lining, London, Smith Elder.Google Scholar
Teall, J. J. H. 1896. Notes on specimens from Possession Island and Cape Adare, collected by Captain Jensen. Appendix II. In: Bull, H. J.The cruise of the ‘Antarctic’ to the South Polar regions, London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Truswell, E. M. 1982. Palynology of sea floor samples collected by the 1911–14 Australasian Antarctic Expedition: implications for the geology of coastal East Antarctica. Geological Society of Australia. Journal, 29: 343–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrell, G. W. 1933. Obituary: Gregory, J. W.. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal, 89: xci–xciv.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1921. Fish remains from the Upper Old Red Sandstone of Granite Harbour, Antarctica. British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition, 1910, Natural history report, geology, 1 (2): 51–62. London, British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Young, W. 1980. On the debunking of Captain Scott—a critique against myths, errors, and distortions. Encounter, 54 (5): 8–19.Google Scholar