Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T13:04:55.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fodder quality analysis of Hippophae salicifolia D. Don (Seabuckthorn) in the Western Himalayas of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2025

Sumit Nangla*
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement and Genetic Resources, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan, HP, India
HP Sankhyan
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement and Genetic Resources, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan, HP, India
Neerja Rana
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Sciences, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan, HP, India
Shradha Ahluwalia
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, PB, India
Shikha Thakur
Affiliation:
Department of Tree Improvement and Genetic Resources, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan, HP, India
Vinaykumar Rachappanavar
Affiliation:
MS Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Shoolini University, Solan, HP, India
Shubham Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni, Solan, HP, India
*
Corresponding author: Sumit Nangla; Email: smtnangla@gmail.com

Abstract

This study examines fodder quality traits of Hippophae salicifolia D. Don (Seabuckthorn) populations across the Western Himalayas of India, emphasizing their significance in domestication and sustainable utilization of indigenous fodder tree. In Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand regions, foliage of H. salicifolia serves as essential winter forage for livestock and is incorporated into local tea formulations. Fifty female genotypes were selected for evaluation from ten distinct geographical locations. Analysis of variance highlighted significant variability among the populations, with Badya population demonstrating the highest leaf fresh weight. In contrast, the Kardang population exhibited optimal values of leaf dry weight and total ash content. Sansha population was characterized by the highest leaf dry matter, crude protein and nitrogen levels, whereas the Jankichatti population showed the highest crude fibre content, and Sissu had the highest nitrogen-free extract value. Significant positive correlations were identified between leaf fresh weight and leaf dry weight (0.613), and between dry matter content and crude protein (0.458), indicating the potential to enhance these traits in breeding programs aimed at improving fodder quality. Accessions were grouped into two primary clusters, and leaf dry matter was the dominant factor influencing fodder quality variability, explaining 85.272% of the total variance. These findings will inform targeted breeding strategies and agricultural practices intended to augment the nutritional profile of this vital fodder resource. Moreover, the study underscores the potential of H. salicifolia as both a livestock forage and a viable component of agroforestry systems, contributing to sustainable agricultural practices in the Western Himalayas.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

AOAC (1995) Official methods of Analysis of AOAC International. In Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Vol. 1, 26th Edn. Washington DC: AOAC International, pp. 4.1–4.20.Google Scholar
Babu, C, Iyanar, K and Kalamani, A (2017) Tree fodder production and management technology. Forestry Technologies-A Complete Value Chain Approach, 343.Google Scholar
Barrett, SCH and Kohn, JR (1991) Genetic evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants. Implications for conservation. In Falk, DA and Holsinger, EK (Eds.), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford: Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandel, SRS (1984) In Handbook of Agricultural Statistics. Kanpur: Achal Prakashan Mandir, 565.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Jiang, X, Zhao, S, Liang, H, Zhang, X, Xu, X, Cao, Y and Li, X (2022) The effects of fixation methods on the composition and activity of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) leaf tea. Journal of Food Quality 3, 110. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3909958Google Scholar
Department of Economic and Statistics, Government of Himachal Pradesh Shimla (2023) Statistical abstract of Himachal Pradesh 2022-23. https://himachalservices.nic.in/economics/pdf/Abstract%202022-23.pdf (accessed 17 June 2020).Google Scholar
Department of Economic and Statistics, Government of Himachal Pradesh Shimla (2024) Statistical abstract of Himachal Pradesh 2023-24. https://himachalservices.nic.in/economics/pdf/Statistical%20Abstract-2023-24__Data%20Visualization.pdf (accessed 3 July 2025).Google Scholar
Divakara, BN and Das, R (2011) Variability and divergence in Pongamia pinnata for further use in tree improvement. Journal of Forestry Research, 22 (2): 193200.Google Scholar
Hammer, O, Harper, D and Ryan, P (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, 19.Google Scholar
Jodha, NS, Banskota, M and Pratap, T (1992) Sustainable Mountain Agriculture Perspectives and Issues Vol. I. Oxford IBH Publishing Co. Ltd, New Delhi, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khosla, PK, Seghal, RN, Sharma, V, Bhatt, AK and Singh, V (1994) Genetic resources of Sea Buckthorn in Himachal Pradesh. Report of Sea Buckthorn Task Force, 18.Google Scholar
Mathew, D, Parimelazhagan, T, Gomez, S and Ahmed, Z (2007) Characterization of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae spp.) genetic resources in India using morphological descriptors. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter=Bulletin de Ressources Phytogénétiques=Noticiario de Recursos Fitogenéticos, 149, 2226.Google Scholar
Nangla, S, Sankhyan, HP and Dutt, B (2022b) Correlation analysis between morphological and fodder characteristics of seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia D Don) populations in Himachal Pradesh. International Journal of Farm Sciences 12(3), 110114. https://doi.org/10.5958/2250-0499.2022.00084.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nangla, S, Sankhyan, HP and Rana, N (2022a) Fodder quality analysis of Hippophae salicifolia D. Don (Seabuckthorn) populations in Himachal Pradesh. The Pharma Innovation Journal 11(6S), 22292234.Google Scholar
Panse, VG and Sukhatme, PV (1967) In Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. New Delhi: ICAR, 610.Google Scholar
Poonam, TIK, Sharma, JP and Singh, NB (2014) Correlation studies on morphometric and fodder quality traits in Bauhinia Variegata. Indian Forester 140(3), 279283.Google Scholar
Pratap, T (1994) High value crops and activities. In Banskota, M and Karki, A (eds), Sustainable Development of fragile Mountain Areas of Asia. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICIMOD, pp. 111134.Google Scholar
PSCNotes (2024) Soil types in Uttarakhand. https://uttarakhand.pscnotes.com/blog/2024/12/24/soil-types-in-uttarakhand/ (accessed 5 July 2025).Google Scholar
Sankaram, A (1966) In A Laboratory Manual for Agricultural Chemistry. Madras: Asia Pub. House, pp. 252263.Google Scholar
Sharma, VK, Dwivedi, SK, Awasthi, OP and Verma, MK (2014) Variation in nutrient composition of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) leaves collected from different locations of Ladakh. Indian Journal of Horticulture 71, 421423.Google Scholar
Sheikh, GG and Majeed Gand Ajaz, AG (2011) Nutritional evaluation of some tree leaves, feeds and fodders of Ladakh. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 28, 427431.Google Scholar
Singh, DN, Shukla, PK, Bhattacharyya, A, Sirohi, R, Singh, Y, Kumar, A and Mamta, (2016) Seabuckthorn: A novel feed opportunity for livestock and poultry health, production & welfare. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology 4, 1317. https://doi.org/10.21088/jafst.2321.1628.4116.3Google Scholar
Singh, R, Bemal, M and Sudesh, R (2004) Chemical composition of some fodder tree leaves used for animal feeding in Chamba District of H.P. Range Management and Agroforestry 25, 177179.Google Scholar
Singh, V (2022) Global distribution of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae Sp.) resources and their utilization. In Sharma, PC (ed.), The Seabuckthorn Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham, pp. 345368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11276-8_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, U and Bartish, IV (2003) Taxonomic synopsis of Hippophae (Elaeagnaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 22, 369374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, DS, Sharma, HR and Moorti, TV (1988) Tribal development in Himachal Pradesh. Agricultural Economics Publicationl 45, 294.Google Scholar
Udensi, OU and Edu, NE (2015) Evaluation and identification of genetic variation pattern in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] accessions using multivariate analyses. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 11, 149158.10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WeatherAPI (2025) Uttarkashi August weather averages Uttarakhand, India https://www.weatherapi.com/history/august/q/uttarkashi-1135872 (accessed 5 July 2025).Google Scholar
Yadav, VK, Sharma, SK, Rao, VK, Yadav, R and Radhakrishna, A (2014) Assessment of morphological and biochemical diversity in Seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia D. Don) populations of Indian central Himalaya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 86, 351357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nangla et al. supplementary material 1

Nangla et al. supplementary material
Download Nangla et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 79.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nangla et al. supplementary material 2

Nangla et al. supplementary material
Download Nangla et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 239.4 KB