Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-nr592 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T08:22:03.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nazarré Merchant and Alan Prince (2023). The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory (Advances in Optimality Theory series). Sheffield: Equinox. Distributed by University of Toronto Press. xii+356 pages.

Review products

Nazarré Merchant and Alan Prince (2023). The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory (Advances in Optimality Theory series). Sheffield: Equinox. Distributed by University of Toronto Press. xii+356 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2025

Jane Chandlee*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, https://ror.org/04fnrxr62 Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Breiss, Canaan & Albright, Adam (2022). Cumulative markedness effects and (non-)linerarity in phonotactics. Glossa 7, 132.Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe (2008). Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence restrictions in Muna and Arabic. NLLT 26, 289337.Google Scholar
Hao, Sophie (2024). Universal generation for Optimality Theory is PSPACE-complete. Computational Linguistics 50, 83117.10.1162/coli_a_00494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey (2010). Learning long-distance phonotactics. LI 41, 623661.Google Scholar
Lamont, Andrew (2021a). Optimality Theory implements complex functions with simple constraints. Phonology 38, 729774.10.1017/S0952675721000361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Andrew (2021b). Optimizing over subsequences generates context-sensitive languages. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 9, 528537.10.1162/tacl_a_00382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Nazarré (2008). Discovering underlying forms: contrast pairs and ranking. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe (1999). Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In Kager, René, van der Hulst, Harry & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.) The prosody–morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 310343.10.1017/CBO9780511627729.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe (2009). Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33, 9991035.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01047.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, Alan (2002a). Arguing optimality. Ms, Rutgers University. ROA #562.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (2002b). Entailed ranking arguments. Ms, Rutgers University. ROA #500.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (2016). One tableau suffices. Ms, Rutgers University. ROA #1250. (First posted on ROA November 2015; current version posted June 2016).Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (2017). What is OT? A concise overview. Ms, Rutgers University. ROA #1271. (First posted on ROA February 2016; current version posted December 2017).Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report 2, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470759400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, Jason (2012). Spherical convexity. Presented to the Rutgers Optimality Research Group, Department of Linguistics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Shih, Stephanie S. (2017). Constraint conjunction in weighted probabilistic grammar. Phonology 34, 243268.10.1017/S0952675717000136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, Juliet (2016). Learnability shapes typology: the case of the midpoint pathology. Lg 92, 753791.Google Scholar