Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-6cxwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T05:07:05.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's “Species”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Elliott Sober
Elliott Sober*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin—Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 334 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

This paper is a descendent of one I read at the 1982 Eastern APA symposium on species, commenting on an ancestor of Philip Kitcher's present paper. I thank Philip Kitcher for stimulating discussion, which helped create the selection pressure that guided the evolution of the ancestral paper into the present descendent. I also am grateful to the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin, Madison for financial support in the form of a Romnes Faculty Fellowship.

References

Allen, G. (1975), Life Sciences in the Twentieth Century. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, P. (1965), “What Numbers Cannot Be”, Philosophical Review 74: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. (1972), “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism”, in T. J. M. Schopf (ed.). Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. (1974), “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem”, Systematic Zoology 23: 536–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C. (1979), “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205: 581–98. Reprinted in Sober (1983a).Google Scholar
Hambourger, R. (1977), “A Difficulty with the Frege-Russell Definition of Number”, Journal of Philosophy 74: 409–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1970), “Contemporary Systematic Philosophies”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 19–54. Reprinted in Sober (1983a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1976), “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25: 174–91. Reprinted in Sober (1983a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1978), “A Matter of Individuality”, Philosophy of Science 45: 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1983), “Filling Some Epistemological Gaps: New Patterns of Inference in Evolutionary Theory”, in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.). PSA 1982, Volume 2, pp. 292–313 East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1984), “Species”, Philosophy of Science 51: 308–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963), Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1969), “Ontological Relativity”, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 36–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1980), “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science 47: 350–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1983a), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. Cambridge: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1983b), “Darwin on Natural Selection: A Philosophical Perspective”, in D. Kohn (ed.). The Darwinian Heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1983c), “The Modern Synthesis: Its Scope and Limits”, in P. D. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.). PSA 1982, Volume 2, pp. 314–21 East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. (1980), Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, P. (1981), “Paleontological Documentation of Speciation in Cenozoic Molluscs from Turkana Basin”, Nature 293: 437–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar