Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-bvlk6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T02:49:00.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Screening-Off and the Units of Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Elliott Sober
Elliott Sober*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, Madison
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, 5173 Helen C. White Hall, 600 North Park Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Brandon ([1982] 1984, 1990) has argued that Salmon's (1971) concept of screening-off can be used to characterize (i) the idea that natural selection acts directly on an organism's phenotype, only indirectly on its genotype, and (ii) the biological problem of the levels of selection. Brandon also suggests (iii) that screening-off events in a causal chain are better explanations than the events they screen off. This paper critically evaluates Brandon's proposals.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 142 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

My thanks to Ellery Eells for his comments on an earlier draft and to the anonymous referee of this journal for useful suggestions.

References

Brandon, R. ([1982] 1984), “The Levels of Selection”. Reprinted in R. Brandon and R. Burian (eds.), Genes, Organisms, and Populations. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 133–141. (Originally published in P. Asquith and T. Nickles [eds.], PSA 1, East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 315–323.)Google Scholar
Brandon, R. (1990), Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eells, E. (1991), Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. (1984), “Caring Groups and Selfish Genes”. Reprinted in E. Sober, Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 119–124.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. and Dunn, L. (1960), “The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse”, Genetics 45: 705–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. ([1961] 1988), “Cause and Effect in Biology”. Reprinted in Towards A New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 24–37. (Originally published in Science 134: 1501–1506.)Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963), Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. (1987), “Competing Units of Selection?: A Case of Symbiosis”, Philosophy of Science 54: 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughgarten, J. (1979), Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1971), Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. With contributions by R. C. Jeffrey and J. G. Greeno. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1981), “Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection”, in Giere, R. and Asquith, P. (eds.), PSA 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 93–121.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1980), The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1980), “Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy”, in Nickles, T. (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 213–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E.; Levine, A.; Sober, E. (1992), “Causal Primacy”, in Reconstructing Marxism: Essays in Evolution and the Theory of History. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar