Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T22:29:48.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther’s Our Genes - Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther, Our Genes: A Philosophical Perspective on Human Evolutionary Genomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2022), 394 pp. $90 (hardcover), $37 (paperback).

Review products

Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther, Our Genes: A Philosophical Perspective on Human Evolutionary Genomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2022), 394 pp. $90 (hardcover), $37 (paperback).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2025

Marina DiMarco*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
Miriam Miyagi*
Affiliation:
Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce.Hypatia 19, no. 1 (2004): 124.10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Elizabeth Grace, Amanda Jane Audesse, Julia Adela Palacios, Dean Michael Bobo, Ashley Elizabeth Webb, Ramachandran, Sohini, and Mariah Henn, Brenna. 2018. “No Evidence for Recent Selection at FOXP2 among Diverse Human Populations.” Cell 174 (6): 1424–35.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bokulich, Alisa, and Parker, Wendy. 2021. “Data Models, Representation and Adequacy-for-Purpose.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (31): 126.10.1007/s13194-020-00345-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Matthew J. 2020. Science and Moral Imagination. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctv18b5d19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Jedidiah, Henn, Brenna M., Al-Hindi, Dana R., and Sohini Ramachandran. 2022. “Counter the Weaponization of Genetics Research by Extremists.” Nature 610 (7932): 444–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03252-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coop, Graham, Eisen, Michael B., Nielsen, Rasmus, Przeworski, Molly, and Rosenberg, Noah. 2014. “Letters: ‘A Troublesome Inheritance.’The New York Times Book Review August 8. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/10/books/review/letters-a-troublesome-inheritance.html.Google Scholar
Havstad, Joyce C. 2022. “Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3): 295320. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2020. “Through the Fractured Looking Glass.” Philosophy of Science 87 (5): 771–92. https://doi.org/10.1086/710787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potochnik, Angela. 2017. Idealization and the Aims of Science. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226507194.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuest, Joanna. 2023. Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo201362155.html.10.7208/chicago/9780226827520.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar