Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-g7ldn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T01:40:14.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forging the Resistive Republic: Social Capital, Institutional Stability, and Civic Virtue in Pluralist Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2024

Adelin-Costin Dumitru Open the ORCID record for Adelin-Costin Dumitru [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Republicans too often take for granted features not easy to bring about in the absence of social capital. Lovett and Pettit (2009) consider that it is through collective political actions that citizens shed light on acts of domination. For Pettit (2012), civic vigilance is the only guarantee that “the government will be forced to remain responsive to popular inputs”. As Kimpell (2023) mentions, one of the weak points of republican theories remains the lack of an account of norm generation. I aim to show how this could occur in a way that does not constitute itself an arbitrary interference of the government in the people’s lives. The kind of generalized reciprocity which is of utmost importance for republicanism often depends on the presence of ties that connect different socio-economic groups within communities and, “where such interactions do not naturally occur, forums for interaction can be intentionally created and designed to encourage development of social capital” (Warner 2001). More specifically, I argue that such forums for interaction could be represented by polycentric systems. Furthermore, I argue that embracing polycentricity constitutes a non-dominating way in which we could promote the “resistive community” (Pettit 2012) required by republicanism. I consider that the empirical results extensively documented in the Institutional Analysis and Development framework are an appropriate starting point for designing novel republican policies and institutions that can function alongside sufficient levels of trust.

Information

Type
Special Section: Democracy
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 23 , Issue 2: Special Section: Climate Politics , June 2025 , pp. 570 - 587
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aligica, Dragos Paul. 2009. “Rethinking Institutional Analysis: Interviews with Vincent and Elinor Ostrom.” Mercatus Center Research Papers. Retrieved June 26, 2024 (https://www.mercatus.org/research/research-papers/rethinking-institutional-analysis-interviews-vincent-and-elinor-ostrom).Google Scholar
Aligica, Dragos Paul. 2014. Institutional Diversity and Political Economy: The Ostroms and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aligica, Dragos Paul. 2019. Public Entrepreneurship, Citizenship, and Self-Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aligica, Dragos Paul, and Tarko, Vlad. 2013. “Co-production, Polycentricity, and Value Heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ Public Choice Institutionalism Revisited.” American Political Science Review 107(4): 726–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Meghan. 2010. “The Tyranny of the Enfranchised Majority? The Accountability of States to their Non-citizen Population.” Res Publica 16(4): 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blomquist, William, and Schroder, Nadine. 2019. “Seeing Polycentrically: Examining Governance Situations Using a Polycentricity Lens.” In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin, 45–64. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, John, and Rahn, Wendy. 1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Lomasky, Loren. 2006. “Against Reviving Republicanism.” Politics, Philosophy& Economics 5(2): 221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Bryan. 2019. “Practising Polycentric Governance.” In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin, 237–255. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Keith, and Gruby, Rebecca. 2019. “Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons.” Policy Studies Journal 47(4): 927–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Karen, and Reidhead, Jacob. 2022. “Social Trust.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, ed. Melenovsky, C.M., 439–450. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Victoria. 2009. “Neo-Republicanism, Freedom as Non-domination, and Citizen Virtue.” Politics, Philosophy& Economics 8(4): 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Michael, Arnold, Gwen, and Tomas, Sergio Villamayor. 2010. “A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management.” Ecology and Society 15(4). Retrieved June 26, 2024 (https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumitru, Adelin-Costin. 2018. “Freedom as Non-Domination, Education and the Common Avowable Interests of Pupils: A Neo-Republican Critique of the Romanian Educational Legislation.” South African Journal of Philosophy 37(1): 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebel, Sarah. 2020. “Moving Beyond Co-Management: Opportunities and Limitations for Enabling Transitions to Polycentric Governance in Chile’s Territorial User Rights in Fisheries Policy.” International Journal of the Commons 14(1): 278–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 2013. “Two Views of the City: Republicanism and Law.” In Republican Democracy. Liberty, Law and Politics, ed. Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp, 128–154. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fortnam, Matt, Evans, Louisa, Ayu Amira Mas, L. Bastian, Chaigneau, Tomas, Lota Alcantara Creencia, H.C. Goh, Gonzales, Benjamin Jareta, Madarcos, Karen Gabalez, Maharja, Carya, Noor Mohd Iqbal, T. Ngoc Le, Praptiwi, R.A., Sugardjito, J., Van Nguyen, Q. and Syazana, W.M.A. Wan Nur. 2022. “Polycentricity in Practice. Marine Governance Transitions in Southeast Asia.” Environmental Science and Policy 137:87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2001. “Social Capital, Civil Society and Development.” Third World Quarterly 22(1): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuna, Marco. 2013. “The Tension Between Law and Politics in the Modern Republican Tradition.” In Republican Democracy. Liberty, Law and Politics, ed. Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp, 5–41. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex. 2020. “Solidarity and Civic Virtue: Labour Republicanism and the Politics of Emancipation in Nineteenth-Century America.” In Radical Republicanism. Recovering the Tradition’s Popular Heritage, ed. Leipold, Bruno, Nabulsi, Karma, and White, Stuart, 149–171. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, Iseult. 2002. Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc. and Stolle, Dietlind. 2003. Generating Social Capital. Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Humphries, Andrew. 2020. “Tocquevillian Education for Self-Governance.” In Exploring the Social and Political Economy of Alexis de Tocqueville, ed. Boettke, Peter and Martin, Adam, 157–188. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDEA. 2022. “Global Democracy Weakens in 2022.” Retrieved on June 26, 2024 (https://www.idea.int/news-media/news/global-democracy-weakens-2022).Google Scholar
Ingham, Sean, and Lovett, Frank. 2019. “Republican Freedom, Popular Control, and Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science 63(4): 774–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimpell, Jessica Johnson. 2009. “Neo-Republicanism: Machivelli’s Solutions for Tocqueville’s Republic”. European Political Science Review 1(3): 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimpell, Jessica Johnson. 2015. “Republican Civic Virtue, Enlightened Self-interest and Tocqueville”. European Journal of Political Theory 14(3): 346–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimpell, Jessica Johnson. 2023. “What About Ethos? Republican Institutions, Oligarchic Democracy, and Norms of Political Equality.” In Wealth and Power. Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Bennett, M., Brouwer, H., and Claassen, R., 25–47. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas. 2019. “Cooperation in Polycentric Governance Systems.” In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William. and Garrick, Dustin, 115–132. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2010. “Exit, Collective Action and Polycentric Political Systems.” Public Choice 143(3/4): 339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, Cecile. 2010. “Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch.” European Journal of Political Theory 9(1): 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Books.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, Joseph, and Streich, Gregory. 2007. “Democratizing Social Capital: In Pursuit of Liberal Egalitarianism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 38(4): 588–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency. The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Edward. 2021. “Individual Sovereignty and Coproduction of Knowledge Governance.” In Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons, ed. Dekker, Erwin and Kuchar, Pavel, 89–112. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank. 2001. “Domination.” Monist 84(1): 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank. 2015. “Civic Virtue.” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, ed. Gibbons, Michael T.. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lovett, Frank. 2019. “Republicanism and Democracy Revisited.” In Republicanism and the Future of Democracy, ed. Elazar, Yiftah and Rousseliere, Genevieve, 117–129. New York Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank. 2022. The Well-Ordered Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. 2009. “Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1996. Discourses on Livy. Trans. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Tarcov, Nathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marti, Jose Luis, and Pettit, Philip. 2010. A Political Philosophy in Public Life. Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maynor, John. 2003. Republicanism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, Michael, and Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. “Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, Public Administration, and Polycentricity.” Public Administration Review 72(1): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Cristopher. 2005. “The Indeterminacy of Republican Policy.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 33(1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Fergus. 2002. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Tiffany, Bodin, Örjan, Graeme, Cumming, Lubell, Mark, Seppelt, Ralf, Seppelt, Tim, and Weible, Cristopher. 2023. “Building Blocks of Polycentric Governance.” Policy Studies Journal 51:475–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, Per. 2003. “What’s the Civil in Civil Society? Robert Putnam, Italy and the Republican Tradition.” Political Studies 51:650–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, Henrik. 2017. Politics in the Roman Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Kenneth. 2001. “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy.” International Political Science Review 22(1): 201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1994. “Constituting Social Capital and Collective Action.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(4): 527–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 92(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. “Social Capital: A Fad or a Fundamental Concept?” In Social Capital. A Multifaceted Perspective, ed. Dasgupta, Partha and Sergeldin, Ismail, 172–214. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-ecological Systems.” Science 325(5939): 419–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” American Economic Review 100(3): 641–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, and Ahn, T.K.. 2009. “The Meaning of Social Capital and Its Link to Collective Action.” In Handbook of Social Capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics, ed. Svendsen, G.T. and Svendsen, G.N.H., 17–36. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, and Ostrom, Vincent. 2004. “The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63(1): 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Walker, James, and Gardner, Roy. 1992. “Covenants With and Without a Sword: Self-governance Is Possible.” American Political Science Review 86(2): 404–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1991. The Meaning of American Federalism. Constituting a Self-Governing Society. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1997. The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies. A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, Tiebout, Charles, and Warren, Robert. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review 55(4): 831–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. 2009. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes.” Global Environmental Change 19:354–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, Roger, Baker, Paula, Kisser, Larry, Oakerson, Ronald, Ostrom, Elinor, Ostrom, Vincent, Percy, Stephen, Vandivot, Martha, Whitaker, Gordon, and Wilson, Rick. 1981. “Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations.” Policy Studies Journal 9(7): 1001–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Andrew. 2011. Civic Republicanism and Civic Education. The Education of Citizens. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2000. ”Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” In Designing Democratic Institutions, ed. Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen, 105–144. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2006. “The Determinacy of Republican Policy: A Reply to McMahon.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 34(3): 275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2001. A Theory of Freedom. From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2013. “Two Republican Traditions.” In Republican Democracy. Liberty, Law and Politics, ed. Niederberger, Andreas and Schink, Philipp, 169–205. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pierre, Jon, and Røiseland, Asbjørn. 2016. “Exit and Voice in Local Government Reconsidered: A ‘Choice Revolution’?” Public Administration 94(3): 738–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polski, Margaret, and Ostrom, Elinor. 2017. “An Institutional Framework for Policy Analysis and Design.” In Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy . Volume 3 : A Framework for Policy Analysis, ed. Cole, Daniel and McGinnis, Michael, 13–47. New York: Lexington Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon& Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert; Leonardi, Robert, and Nonetti, Raffaella. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rayner, Tim, and Jordan, Andrew. 2013. “The European Union: The Polycentric Climate Policy Leader?” WIREs Climate Change 4(2): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Robert, and Jackson, Elton. 2001. “Is Trust in Others Declining in America? An Age-Period Cohort Analysis.” Social Science Research 30(1): 117–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostboll, Christian. 2015. “Non-Domination and Democratic Legitimacy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18(4): 424–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, Alex. 2014. “Political Rights, Republican Freedom, and Temporary Workers.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17(2): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1990. “The Republican Ideal of Liberty.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio, 293–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2006. “A Third Concept of Liberty.” In The Liberty Reader, ed. Miller, David, 243–255. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Snir, Itay, and Eylon, Yval. 2017. “Civic Republicanism and Education: Democracy and Social Justice in School.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 36(5): 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Mark, Marshall, Graham, and McGinnis, Michael. 2019. “An Introduction to Polycentricity and Governance.” In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin, 21–44. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarko, Vlad. 2017. Elinor Ostrom. An Intellectual Biography. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Tarko, Vlad. 2022. “Polycentricity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, ed. Melenovsky, C.M., 186–200. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarko, Vlad, Schlager, Edella, and Lutter, Mark. 2019. “The Faustian Bargain: Power-sharing, Constitutions, and the Practice of Polycentricity in Governance.” In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin, 219–236. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin. 2019. “Introduction”. In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin, 1–19. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, Andreas, and Moser, Christine. 2019. “Foundational Aspects of Polycentric Governance: Overarching Rules, Social-Problem Characteristics, and Heterogeneity.” In Governing Complexity. Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity, ed. Thiel, Andreas, Blomquist, William, and Garrick, Dustin, 65–90. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. “Democracy and Republicanism. A Difficult Partnership”. In Republicanism and the Future of Democracy, ed. Elazar, Yiftah and Rousseliere, Genevieve, 152–169. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, Eric. 1999. “Democracy and Social Capital.” In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren, Mark, 121–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, Eric. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard. 2005. “Self-Governance, Polycentrism, and Federalism: Recurring Themes in Vincent Ostrom’s Scholarly Oeuvre.” Journal of Economic Behavior& Organization 57:173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Richard, and Yokoyama, Akira. 2014. “Polycentrism, Federalism, and Liberty: A Comparative Systems Perspective/” George Mason University Working Paper no. 14-10, Retrieved June 26, 2024 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2435537).Google Scholar
Wallis, Allan; Crocker, Jarle, and Schechter, Bill. 1998. “Social Capital and Community Building: Part One.” National Civic Review 87(3): 253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Mildred. 2001. “Building Social Capital: The Role of Local Government.” Journal of Socio-Economics 30:187–92.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2011. “Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 105(4): 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan; Ostrom, Elinor, and Cox, Michael. 2013. “Generalizing the Core Design Principles for the Efficacy of Groups.” Journal of Economic Behavior& Organization 905: S21–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Patricia. 1997. “Building Social Capital: A Learning Agenda for the Twenty-First Century.” Urban Studies 34(5-6): 745–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar