Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T03:32:50.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunity to Hymenolepis diminuta: unresponsiveness of the athymic nude mouse to infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. W. Bland
P. W. Bland
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Male and female congenitally athymic nude (nu/nu) mice infected with a single cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta at 6 weeks of age retain the infection for at least 33 days. In the males of their phenotypically normal litter-mates, however, a single cysticercoid infection establishes and grows but is expelled between days 11 and 17. The unresponsiveness of the nude mouse to single H. diminuta infection is evidence that the immune rejection from normal mice is thymus-dependent.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 93 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Befus, A. D. (1975). Secondary infections of Hymenolepis diminuta in mice: effects of varying worm burdens in primary and secondary infections. Parasitology 71, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Befus, A. D. & Featherston, D. W. (1974). Delayed rejection of single Hymenolepis diminuta in primary infections of young mice. Parasitology 69, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972 a). The development of Hymenolepis diminuta in primary and secondary infections in mice. Parasitology 64, 401–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972 b). The effect of immunosuppressants on the development of Hymenolepis diminuta in mice. Parasitology 65, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, R. H. & Reed, N. D. (1974 a). The immune response of congenitally athymic (nude) mice to the intestinal nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 147, 667–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, R. H. & Reed, N. D. (1974 b). The thymus dependency of resistance to pinworm infection in mice. The Journal of Parasitology 60, 976–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kindred, B. & Loor, F. (1974). Activity of host-derived T cells which differentiate in nude mice grafted with co-isogenic or allogeneic thymuses. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 139, 1215–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loor, F. & Kindred, B. (1973). Differentiation of T-cell precursors in nude mice demonstrated by immunofluorescence of T-cell membrane markers. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 138, 1044–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, N. D., Manning, J. K., Baker, P. J. & Ulrich, J. T. (1974). Analysis of ‘thymusindependent’ immune responses using nude mice. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Nude Mice (ed. Rygaard, J.), pp. 95–103. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ruitenberg, E. J. & Steerenberg, P. A. (1974). Intestinal phase of Trichinella spiralis in congenitally athymic (nude) mice. The Journal of Parasitology 60, 1056–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Targett, G. A. T. (1973). Thymus dependency and chronic antigenic stimulation: immunity to parasitic protozoans and helminths. In Contemporary Topics in Immunobiology, vol. 2 (ed. Davies, A. J. S. and Carter, R. L.), pp. 217–35. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortis, H. H. (1971). Immunological responses of ‘nude’ mice. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 8. 305–17.Google ScholarPubMed