Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T15:27:19.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. Evidence that the mechanisms which mediate resistance during early patent infections may lack immunological specificity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. A. Harrison ,
Q. Bickle  and
M. J. Doenhoff
R. A. Harrison
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans, AL4 0XQ
Q. Bickle
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans, AL4 0XQ
M. J. Doenhoff
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans, AL4 0XQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mice infected with 25 to 35 unsexed Schistosoma mansoni cercariae became resistant to homologous challenge by 8 weeks, and the degree of resistance that was acquired correlated with the size of the worm burden and the tissue egg burden. Mice given 100 male or 100 female cercariae alone failed to become resistant even after 30–40 weeks of infection. When a super-infection of 100 male or 100–300 female cercariae was given to mice with 25 unsexed cercariae, the degree of resistance that was acquired was generally lower than in mice given 25 unsexed cercariae alone. In the super-infected mice there was no correlation between the size of the worm burden (mainly unpaired male or female worms) and the degree of acquired resistance. In mice super-infected with male worms there was an inverse correlation between the number of male worms and the number of eggs deposited in the liver and intestine by each mature worm pair. A positive correlation was, however, still found between the degree of acquired resistance and total tissue egg counts in mice super-infected with single sex cercariae. Mice injected intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with intact S. mansoni eggs failed to become resistant to S. mansoni challenge. Transfer of lymphoid cells or serum, separately or together, from heavily infected and demonstrably resistant donor mice to naive normal or T-cell deprived recipients failed to render the recipients resistant to S. mansoni challenge. The results indicate that resistance to re-infection in mice with recently patent S. mansoni infections is dependent on the number of S. mansoni eggs entrapped in the tissues, and that excessive numbers of unpaired S. mansoni male or female worms can inhibit the fecundity of established worm pairs. The apparent acquired resistance to S. mansoni that has been observed in this model system may be largely a consequence of non-specific factors interfering with normal patterns of challenge worm migration and maturation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 93 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bickle, Q., Bain, J., McGregor, A. & Doenhoff, M. (1979). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. III. The failure of primary infections with cercariae of one sex to induce resistance to reinfection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 73, 37–41.Google Scholar
Bickle, Q., Long, E., James, E., Doenhoff, M. & Festing, M. (1980). Schistosoma mansoni: Influence of the mouse host's sex, age, and strain on resistance to reinfection. Experimental Parasitology 50, 222–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bout, D., Dupas, H., Carlier, Y., Afchain, D. & Capron, A. (1977). High resistance induced by young live Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice. Annales d'Immunologie (Institut Pasteur) 128C, 811–16.Google Scholar
Cheever, A. W. (1968). Conditions affecting the accuracy of potassium hydroxide digestion techniques for counting Schistosoma mansoni eggs in tissue. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 39, 328–31.Google Scholar
Coker, C. M. & von Lichtenberg, F. (1956). A revised method for isolation of Schistosoma mansoni eggs for biological experimentation. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 92, 780–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, D. A., Bukowski, M. A. & Clark, S. S. (1981). Attempts to transfer the resistance of Schistosoma mansoni – infected and irradiated cercaria – immunized mice by means of parabiosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 30, 113–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, D. A., Minard, P., Murrell, K. D. & Vannier, W. E. (1978 a). Resistance of mice to secondary infection with Schistosoma mansoni. II. Evidence for a correlation between egg deposition and worm elimination. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 27, 957–67.Google Scholar
Dean, D. A., Minard, P., Stirewalt, M. A., Vannier, W. E. & Murrell, K. D. (1978 b). Resistance of mice to secondary infection with Schistosoma mansoni. I. Comparison of bisexual and unisexual infections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 27, 951–6.Google Scholar
Doenhoff, M., Bickle, Q., Bain, J., Webbe, G. & Nelson, G. (1980). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. V. Reduction in the degree of resistance to reinfection after chemotherapeutic elimination of recently patent primary infections. Journal of Helminthology 54, 7–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doenhoff, M., Bickle, Q., Long, E., Bain, J. & McGregor, A. (1978). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in mice. I. Demonstration of resistance to reinfection using a model system that involves perfusion of mice within three weeks of challenge. Journal of Helminthology 52, 173–86.Google Scholar
Doenhoff, M. & Long, E. (1979). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. IV. The inability of T-cell -deprived mice to resist re-infection, and other in vivo studies on the mechanisms of resistance. Parasitology 78, 171–83.Google Scholar
Doenhoff, M. J., Pearson, S., Dunne, D. W., Bickle, Q., Lucas, S., Bain, J. & Hassounah, O. (1981). Immunological control of hepatotoxicity and parasite egg excretion in Schistosoma mansoni infections: Stage specificity of the reactivity of immune sera in T-cell deprived mice. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75, 41–53.Google Scholar
Gysin, J. & Le Corroller, Y. (1976). The effect of inflammatory reaction of the mouse on experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 62, 697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtenberg, F. Von, Sadun, E. H. & Bruce, J. I. (1963). Host response to eggs of Schistosoma mansoni. III. The role of eggs in resistance. Journal of Infectious Diseases 113, 113–22.Google Scholar
Long, E., Doenhoff, M. & Bain, J. (1978). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse; 2. The time at which resistance to reinfection develops. Journal of Helminthology 52, 187–91.Google Scholar
Long, E., Harrison, R., Bickle, Q., Bain, J., Nelson, G. & Doenhoff, M. (1980). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. The effect of varying the route and the number of primary infections, and the correlation between the size of the primary infection and the degree of resistance that is acquired. Parasitology 81, 355–71.Google Scholar
Long, E., Lwin, M., Targett, G. & Doenhoff, M. (1981). Factors affecting the acquisition of resistance against Schistosoma mansoni in the mouse. VIII. Failure of concurrent infections with Plasmodium chabaudi to affect resistance to reinfection with S. mansoni. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 75, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, S. E., Chandler, F. W., McDougal, J. S., Slemenda, S. B. & Kagan, I. G. (1978). Schistosoma mansoni infection in intact and B cell deficient mice: The effect of pretreatment with BCG in these experimental models. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 27, 966–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. V., Crandall, R. B. & Hunter, G. W. (1963). Studies on schistosomiasis. XX. Further studies on the immunogenic significance of Schistosoma mansoni eggs in albino mice when subjected to homologous challenge. Journal of Parasitology 49, 117–20.Google Scholar
Olds, G. H., Chedid, L., Lederer, E. & Mahmoud, A. A. F. (1980). Induction of resistance to Schistosoma mansoni by natural cord factor and synthetic lower analogues. Journal of Infectious Diseases 141, 473–8.Google Scholar
Olivier, L. J. (1966). Infectivity of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 15, 882–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, S. M., Reid, W. A., Bruce, J. I., Hedlund, K., Colvin, R. G., Campbell, R., Diggs, C. L. & Sadun, E. H. (1975). The cellular and humoral immune response to Schistosoma mansoni infections in inbred rats. I. Mechanisms during initial exposure. Cellular Immunology 19, 99–116.Google Scholar
Phillips, S. M., Reid, W. A., Doughty, B. & Khoury, P. B. (1978). The cellular and humoral immune response to Schistosoma mansoni infections in inbred rats. III. Development of optimal protective immunity following natural infections and artificial immunizations. Cellular Immunology 38, 225–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Smithers, S. R. & Mackenzie, P. (1975). Passive transfer of acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in mice. Parasitology 70, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, A., Smithers, S. R., Mackenzie, P. & Broomfield, K. (1977). Schistosoma mansoni: Immunoglobulins involved in passive immunizations of laboratory mice. Experimental Parasitology 40, 160–6.Google Scholar
Smith, M. A., Clegg, J. A., Kusel, J. R. & Webbe, G. (1975). Lung inflammation in immunity to Schistosoma mansoni. Experientia 31, 595–6.Google Scholar
Smithers, S. R. (1960). The isolation of viable schistosome eggs by a digestion technique. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 54, 68–70.Google Scholar
Smithers, S. R. (1962). Stimulation of acquired resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in monkeys: Role of eggs and worms. Experimental Parasitology 12, 263–73.Google Scholar
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965). The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of adult worms. Parasitology 55, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M. G., Amin, M. B. A. & Nelson, G. S. (1969). ‘Parthenogenesis’ in Schistosoma mattheei. Journal of Helminthology 43, 197–206.Google Scholar