Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T00:24:16.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost Comparisons of Alternative Methods for Processing Recycled Waste Newspapers into Farm-Animal Bedding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

James G. Beierlein ,
William C. McSweeny  and
Barbara A. Woodruff
James G. Beierlein
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University
William C. McSweeny
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University
Barbara A. Woodruff
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Abstract

The United States is facing a seemingly overwhelming problem of how to dispose of its solid waste. For disposal solutions to be viable, they must be environmentally sound and economically viable. Processing waste newspapers for farm-animal bedding offers a successful partial solution that meets both criteria. Centralized newspaper chopping is found to cost less than on-farm chopping. Both chopped and unchopped waste newspapers can be economically transported considerable distances. The use of waste newspapers for animal bedding is economically attractive at the farm level and can provide a partial solution to the solid-waste disposal problem.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , October 1991 , pp. 208 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdalla, C. W., Stotler, N. L., and Panichella, A. L. “Municipal Solid Waste Management in Pennsylvania.” Extension Circular 371. The Pennsylvania State University, College of Agriculture, August 1989.Google Scholar
Beck, M. “Buried Alive.” Newsweek, 27 November 1989, 66–76.Google Scholar
Beierlein, J. G., Woodruff, B. A., and McSweeny, W. T. “The Financial Feasibility of Using Newspapers for Farm Animal Bedding: A Partial Solution for Solid Waste Disposal.” Extension Circular 383. The Pennsylvania State University, College of Agriculture, March 1990.Google Scholar
Comerford, J. “The Feasibility of Using Newspapers as a Bedding Material for Farm Animals.” Semiannual report to the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Contract no. ME 449226. July 1990.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. (owner-operator of Fisher's Implements, Lewistown, PA). Personal communications with the authors. December 1989.Google Scholar
Franklin Associates, Limited. “Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States, 1960–2000.” Report PB87-17823. Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 25 July 1986.Google Scholar
Gingrich, N. (instructor in Farm Management, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University). Personal communications with the authors. October 1990.Google Scholar
Karakash, J. T. (project director, Northern Pennsylvania Energy Center, Montrose, PA). Personal communications with the authors. December 1989.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. E. “Garbage Rate Hike is Likely.” Centre Daily Times, 18 October 1990, B-J.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. Bureau of Waste Management. “Recyclable Materials Market Development Study.” 1988.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. Bureau of Waste Management. “The Status of Existing and Proposed Facilities for the Processing and Disposal of Municipal Solid Waste in Pennsylvania.” May 1988.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. Bureau of Waste Management. “Municipal Waste Generation Estimates by County.” 1 December 1988.Google Scholar
“Recycling Market Strategy Focuses on Increasing Demand, Creating New Products.” Pennsylvania Township News, August 1989.Google Scholar
Shaw, L. K., and Park, W. M. “The Economic Feasibility of Rural Recycling: Three Case Studies.” Research Report 89–15. University of Tennessee, Agricultural Experiment Station, August 1989.Google Scholar
Shipp, R. F., and Temple, G. H. “Newspapers: Market Glut Equals Farmer Opportunity.” Agronomy Gleanings 25:1. The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agronomy, 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Marketing Service. “Fruit and Vegetable Truck Report.” December 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “The Solid Waste Dilemma: An Agenda for Action.” Final report of the Municipal Solid Waste Task Force, Office of Solid Waste. February 1989.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Decision-makers’ Guide to Solid Waste Management.” Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OS-305), EPA/530-SW-89–072. November 1989.Google Scholar