Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-nmpfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-15T04:40:50.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Philip Hardie
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Other
Information
New Surveys in the Classics , Volume 28: Virgil , 1998 , pp. iii - iv
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 For a good essay on the movements in twentieth-century Virgil criticism see S. J. Harrison’s ‘Introduction’ to Harrison (1990). The appearance of an English translation of Richard Heinze’s Virgih epische Technik, nearly a hundred years after its first publication, has also provided the occasion to reflect on continuity and discontinuity in the practices of Virgilian criticism: see Hardie, P. R., ‘Virgil’s epic techniques: Heinze ninety years on’, CP 90 (1995), 267–76 Google Scholar.