Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Schaefer, Didier G.
and
Zrÿd, Jean-Pierre
2001.
The Moss Physcomitrella patens, Now and Then.
Plant Physiology,
Vol. 127,
Issue. 4,
p.
1430.
Champagne, Connie E. M.
and
Ashton, Neil W.
2001.
Ancestry of KNOX genes revealed by bryophyte (Physcomitrella patens) homologs.
New Phytologist,
Vol. 150,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Allen, Bruce
Buck, William R.
Pursell, Ronald A.
and
Thiers, Barbara M.
2001.
Recent Literature on Bryophytes—104(1).
The Bryologist,
Vol. 104,
Issue. 1,
p.
170.
Ng, Medard
and
Yanofsky, Martin F.
2001.
Function and evolution of the plant MADS-box gene family.
Nature Reviews Genetics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3,
p.
186.
Theißen, Günter
Münster, Thomas
and
Henschel, Katrin
2001.
Why don’t mosses flower?.
New Phytologist,
Vol. 150,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Hiwatashi, Yuji
Nishiyama, Tomoaki
Fujita, Tomomichi
and
Hasebe, Mitsuyasu
2001.
Establishment of gene‐trap and enhancer‐trap systems in the moss Physcomitrella patens.
The Plant Journal,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
105.
Henschel, Katrin
Kofuji, Rumiko
Hasebe, Mitsuyasu
Saedler, Heinz
Münster, Thomas
and
Theißen, Günter
2002.
Two Ancient Classes of MIKC-type MADS-box Genes are Present in the Moss Physcomitrella patens.
Molecular Biology and Evolution,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 6,
p.
801.
Münster, T.
Faigl, W.
Saedler, H.
and
Theiβen, G.
2002.
Evolutionary Aspects of MADS‐box Genes in the Eusporangiate Fern Ophioglossum.
Plant Biology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 4,
p.
474.
Cooke, Todd J.
Poli, DorothyBelle
Sztein, A. Ester
and
Cohen, Jerry D.
2002.
Auxin Molecular Biology.
p.
319.
Hohe, A.
Rensing, S. A.
Mildner, M.
Lang, D.
and
Reski, R.
2002.
Day Length and Temperature Strongly Influence Sexual Reproduction and Expression of a Novel MADS‐Box Gene in the MossPhyscomitrella patens.
Plant Biology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 5,
p.
595.
Markmann-Mulisch, Ulrich
Hadi, Masood Z.
Koepchen, Kerstin
Alonso, Juan C.
Russo, Vincenzo E. A.
Schell, Jeff
and
Reiss, Bernd
2002.
The organization of
Physcomitrella patens
RAD51
genes is unique among eukaryotic organisms
.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 99,
Issue. 5,
p.
2959.
Cooke, Todd J.
Poli, DorothyBelle
Sztein, A. Ester
and
Cohen, Jerry D.
2002.
Evolutionary patterns in auxin action.
Plant Molecular Biology,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
319.
Schaefer, Didier G.
2002.
A NEWMOSSGENETICS: Targeted Mutagenesis inPhyscomitrella patens.
Annual Review of Plant Biology,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 1,
p.
477.
Riechmann, José Luis
2002.
Transcriptional Regulation: a Genomic Overview.
The Arabidopsis Book,
Vol. 1,
Issue. ,
p.
e0085.
Shepard, Kristen A
and
Purugganan, Michael D
2002.
The genetics of plant morphological evolution.
Current Opinion in Plant Biology,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
49.
Svensson, Mats E.
and
Engström, Peter
2002.
Closely related MADS‐box genes in club moss (Lycopodium) show broad expression patterns and are structurally similar to, but phylogenetically distinct from, typical seed plant MADS‐box genes.
New Phytologist,
Vol. 154,
Issue. 2,
p.
439.
Laurie, David A.
and
Devos, Katrien M.
2002.
Trends in comparative genetics and their potential impacts on wheat and barley research.
Plant Molecular Biology,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
729.
Johansen, Bo
Pedersen, Louise B.
Skipper, Martin
and
Frederiksen, Signe
2002.
MADS-box gene evolution—structure and transcription patterns.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
458.
Irish, Vivian F.
2003.
The evolution of floral homeotic gene function.
BioEssays,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 7,
p.
637.
Litt, Amy
and
Irish, Vivian F
2003.
Duplication and Diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL Floral Homeotic Gene Lineage: Implications for the Evolution of Floral Development.
Genetics,
Vol. 165,
Issue. 2,
p.
821.