Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-11T04:22:56.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermoelectric Power Changes of Low Strength Steel Induced by Hydrogen Embrittlement Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

N. Mohamed-Noriega ,
E. López Cuéllar  and
A. Martinez de la Cruz
N. Mohamed-Noriega
Affiliation:
FIME, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza, México.
E. López Cuéllar
Affiliation:
FIME, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza, México.
A. Martinez de la Cruz
Affiliation:
FIME, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza, México.
Get access

Abstract

This work reports the thermoelectric characterization of a hydrogen embrittlement (HE) of low strength steel. Two sets of tests are performed in an electrochemical cell of H2SO4, with and without applied stress, lasting from 2 to 94 hours. Thermoelectric power (TEP) measurements are matched with ductility measurements (%RA and %EL) of samples tested in tension, as well as with microhardness measurements. Results indicate that TEP is sensitive to HE of low strength steels; the maximum variation of TEP is of ∼80nV/°C for samples tested without stress.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1243: Symposium 5 – Advanced Structural Materials , 2009 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Leborgne, J. M., PhD Thesis (No. 96ISLA0134), INSA-Lyon, 1996.Google Scholar
2. Kawaguchi, Y. y Yamanaka, S. J. of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 336, p. 301–314, 2002.Google Scholar
3. López Cuéllar, E. et al., J. of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 467, p. 572–577, 2009.Google Scholar
4. Caballero, F.G. et al., Scripta Materialia, Vol. 50, p. 1061–1066, 2004.Google Scholar
5. Benamati, G. et al., J. of Nuclear Materials Vol. 212–215, p. 1401–1405, 1994.Google Scholar
6. Gojic, M., Kosecb, L. and Matkovic, P. Eng. Failure Analysis Vol. 10, p. 93–102, 2003.Google Scholar
7. Lacombe, P. et al., HE and SCC, ASM, pp. 79–102, 1984.Google Scholar
8. Bernstein, M. et al., HE and Stress Corrosion Cracking, ASM, pp. 135–152, 1984.Google Scholar
9. Lopez Cuellar, E., Guenin, G. and Morin, M. Mat. Sci. Eng. Vol. A358, p. 350–355, 2003.Google Scholar
10. Borrelly, R. and Benkirat, D. Acta Metall Vol. 33 No. 5, p. 855–866, 1985.Google Scholar
11. Benkirat, D., Merle, P. and Borrelly, R. Acta Metall Vol. 36 No. 3, p. 613–620, 1988.Google Scholar
12. Lewis, F.A., Pure & Appl. Chem., Vol. 62, Issue 11, p. 2091–2096, 1990.Google Scholar
13. Robertson, I. M., Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 68, p. 671–692, 2001.Google Scholar
14. Dean, F. W. H. and Powell, S. W., NACE International, No. 04472, pp. 1–14, 2004.Google Scholar