Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T17:50:06.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physico-chemical characterization of a spent UO2 fuel with respect to its stability under final disposal conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2014

Ernesto González-Robles ,
Detlef H. Wegen ,
Elke Bohnert ,
Dimitrios Papaioannou ,
Nikolaus Müller ,
Ramil Nasyrow ,
Bernhard Kienzler  and
Volker Metz
Ernesto González-Robles
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE), Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Detlef H. Wegen
Affiliation:
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, P.O. Box 2340, D-76125 Karlsruhe, Germany
Elke Bohnert
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE), Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Dimitrios Papaioannou
Affiliation:
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, P.O. Box 2340, D-76125 Karlsruhe, Germany
Nikolaus Müller
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE), Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Ramil Nasyrow
Affiliation:
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, P.O. Box 2340, D-76125 Karlsruhe, Germany
Bernhard Kienzler
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE), Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Volker Metz
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE), Hermann-von-Helmholtz Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Two adjacent fuel rod segments were irradiated in a pressurized water reactor achieving an average burn-up of 50.4 GWd/tHM. A physico-chemical characterisation of the high burn-up fuel rod segments was performed, to determine properties relevant to the stability of the spent nuclear fuel under final disposal conditions. No damage of the cladding was observed by means of visual examination and γ-scanning. The maximal oxide layer thickness was 45 µm. The relative fission gas release was determined to be (8.35 ± 0.66) %. Finally, a rim thickness of 83.7 µm and a rim porosity of about 20% were derived from characterisation of the cladded pellets.

Keywords

nuclear materialsUgeologic

Information

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1665: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXVII , 2014 , pp. 283 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Olander, D.R.. Technical Report TID-26711-P1, California University (1976).Google Scholar
Matzke, Hj, Blank, H., Coquerelle, M., Lassmann, K., Ray, I. L. F., Ronchi, C., Walker, C. T.. J. Nucl. Mat. 166, 165–178 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, D., Nasyrow, R., De Weerd, W., Bottomley, D., Rondinella, V. V.. Non-destructive examinations of irradiated fuel rods at the ITU hot cells, 2012 Hotlab conference, 24th-27th September 2012, Marcoule, France (2012).Google Scholar
Kleykamp, H.. Technical Report KfK-3394 (1983).Google Scholar
Wegen, D.H., Papaioannou, D., Gretter, R., Nasyrow, R., Rondinella, V. V., Glatz, J.-P.. KIT scientific report 7639, p.193–199 (2013).Google Scholar
Sakugari, T., Tanabe, H., Hirose, E., Skashita, A., Nishimura, T.. Proc. 15th Intl. Conf. Envir. Remed. Rad. Waste Manag., September 2013, Brussels, Belgium (2013).Google Scholar
Garzarolli, F., Garzarolli, M., ed. Rudling, P.. High Burnup Fuel Design Isssue and Cosequences (Advanced Nuclear Technology International, Mölnlycke, Sweden, 2012) p. 41.Google Scholar
KORIGEN code. http://www.nucleonica.net/Application/Korigen.aspx Google Scholar
Metz, V., et al. ,. Deliverable No: 1.2, pp. 85 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., Günther-Leopold, I., Kobler Waldis, J., Linder, H.P., Low, J., Cui, D., Ekeroth, E., Spahiu, K., Evins, L.Z.. J. Nucl. Mat. 420 54–62 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., Ferry, C., Poinssot, C., Lovera, P. J. Nucl. Mat., 346, 56–65. (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Y.-H., Lee, B.-H., Cheon, J.-S., Sohn, D.-S.. J. Nucl. Mat. 295, 213–220 (2001).10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00535-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar